Learning from the future of component repositories

CBSE'12 - Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Component Based Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 51-60

  Abate, Pietro ^a   Di Cosmo, Roberto ^a   Treinen, Ralf ^a   Zacchiroli, Stefano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Component repository; Quality assurance; Speculative analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT REPOSITORY; DEBIAN DISTRIBUTION; EXPERIENCE REPORT; FINITE SET; LARGE COMPONENTS; POSSIBLE FUTURES; SPECULATIVE ANALYSIS;

METADATA; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

QUALITY ASSURANCE;

EID: 84864054133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2304736.2304747     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. P. Abate, J. Boender, R. Di Cosmo, and S. Zacchiroli. Strong dependencies between software components. In International Symposium on Empirical Sofware Engineering and Measurement, pages 89-99. IEEE, 2009.
2. P. Abate and R. Di Cosmo. Predicting upgrade failures using dependency analysis. In HotSWup'11, 2011.
3. Y. Brun, R. Holmes, M. D. Ernst, and D. Notkin. Speculative analysis: exploring future development states of software. In FoSER Workshop on Future of Software Engineering Research at FSE 2010, pages 59-64. ACM, 2010.
4. M. Danelutto and R. Di Cosmo. A "minimal disruption" skeleton experiment: seamless map & reduce embedding in OCaml. Procedia CS, 2012. To appear.
5. J. Gonzalez-Barahona, G. Robles, M. Michlmayr, J. Amor, and D. German. Macro-level software evolution: a case study of a large software compilation. Empirical Software Engineering, 14(3):262-285, 2009.
6. T. L. Graves, A. F. Karr, J. S. Marron, and H. Siy. Predicting fault incidence using software change history. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 26(7):653-661, 2000.
7. R. A. Hanneman and M. Riddle. Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside, 2005.
8. H. H. Kagdi, M. L. Collard, and J. I. Maletic. A survey and taxonomy of approaches for mining software repositories in the context of software evolution. Journal of Software Maintenance, 19(2):77-131, 2007. (Pubitemid 46752051)
9. K.-K. Lau and Z. Wang. Software component models. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 33(10):709-724, 2007. (Pubitemid 47455981)
10. M. M. Lehman and L. A. Belady, editors. Program evolution: processes of software change. Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, 1985.
11. F. Mancinelli, J. Boender, R. Di Cosmo, J. Vouillon, B. Durak, X. Leroy, and R. Treinen. Managing the complexity of large free and open source package-based software distributions. In ASE, pages 199-208, 2006. (Pubitemid 47159347)
12. N. Nagappan and T. Ball. Using software dependencies and churn metrics to predict field failures: An empirical case study. In ESEM, pages 364-373, 2007.
13. S. Neuhaus, T. Zimmermann, C. Holler, and A. Zeller. Predicting vulnerable software components. In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 529-540, 2007.
14. C. Szyperski. Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison Wesley Professional, 1997.
15. R. Treinen and S. Zacchiroli. Solving package dependencies: from EDOS to Mancoosi. In DebConf 8: proceedings of the 9th conference of the Debian project, 2008.
16. J. Whitehead and T. Zimmermann, editors. 7th International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, MSR 2010. IEEE, 2010.
17. T. Zimmermann and N. Nagappan. Predicting defects using network analysis on dependency graphs. In ICSE'08, pages 531-540. ACM, 2008.