OCL-based runtime monitoring of applications with protocol state machines

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7349 LNCS, Issue , 2012, Pages 384-399

  Hamann, Lars ^a   Hofrichter, Oliver ^a   Gogolla, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT MODELS; ADVANCED DYNAMICS; DYNAMIC PROPERTY; FORMAL VERIFICATIONS; JAVA VIRTUAL MACHINES; OBJECT-ORIENTED IMPLEMENTATION; RUNTIME MONITORING; STATE MACHINE; STATIC MODEL; VIRTUAL MACHINES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84864053359     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31491-9_29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Anand, S., Pǎsǎreanu, C.S., Visser, W.: JPF-SE: A Symbolic Execution Extension to Java PathFinder. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4424, pp. 134-138. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
2. Avila, C., Sarcar, A., Cheon, Y., Yeep, C.: Runtime Constraint Checking Approaches for OCL, A Critical Comparison. In: SEKE (2010)
3. Balasubramanian, D., Pasareanu, C.S., Whalen, M.W., Karsai, G., Lowry, M.R.: Polyglot: modeling and analysis for multiple Statechart formalisms. In: Dwyer, M.B., Tip, F. (eds.) ISSTA, pp. 45-55. ACM (2011)
4. Balz, M., Striewe, M., Goedicke, M.: Monitoring Model Specifications in Program Code Patterns. In: Proc. of the 5th Int. WS Models@run.time, pp. 60-71 (2010)
5. Bodden, E.: Stateful breakpoints: a practical approach to defining parameterized runtime monitors. In: ESEC/FSE 2011. ACM, New York (2011)
6. Bodden, E., Hendren, L.J., Lam, P., Lhoták, O., Naeem, N.A.: Collaborative Runtime Verification with Tracematches. J. Log. Comput. 20(3), 707-723 (2010)
7. Cabot, J., Teniente, E.: Incremental integrity checking of UML/OCL conceptual schemas. Journal of Systems and Software 82(9), 1459-1478 (2009)
8. Demuth, B., Wilke, C.: Model and object verification by using Dresden OCL. In: Proceedings of the Russian-German Workshop Innovation Information Technologies: Theory and Practice, Ufa, Russia, pp. 687-690 (2009)
9. Dzidek, W.J., Briand, L.C., Labiche, Y.: Lessons Learned from Developing a Dynamic OCL Constraint Enforcement Tool for Java. In: Bruel, J.-M. (ed.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3844, pp. 10-19. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
10. Froihofer, L., Glos, G., Osrael, J., Goeschka, K.M.: Overview and Evaluation of Constraint Validation Approaches in Java. In: Proc. of ICSE 2007, pp. 313-322. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2007)
11. Gogolla, M., Büttner, F., Richters, M.: USE: A UML-Based Specification Environment for Validating UML and OCL. Science of Computer Programming 69, 27-34 (2007)
12. Gogolla, M., Hamann, L., Xu, J., Zhang, J.: Exploring (Meta-)Model Snapshots by Combining Visual and Textual Techniques. In: Proc. 10th Int. Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques (GT-VMT 2011) (2011)
13. Gogolla, M., Kuhlmann, M., Hamann, L.: Consistency, Independence and Consequences in UML and OCL Models. In: Dubois, C. (ed.) TAP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5668, pp. 90-104. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
14. Gopinathan, M., Rajamani, S.K.: Runtime Monitoring of Object Invariants with Guarantee. In: Leucker, M. (ed.) RV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5289, pp. 158-172. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
15. Hamann, L., Gogolla, M., Kuhlmann, M.: OCL-Based Runtime Monitoring of JVM Hosted Applications. In: Proc. WS OCL and Textual Modelling. ECEASST (2011)
16. Hamann, L., Vidács, L., Gogolla, M., Kuhlmann, M.: Abstract Runtime Monitoring with USE. In: Proc. CSMR 2012, pp. 549-552 (2012)
17. Katoen, J.P., Baier, C.: Principles of Model Checking. MIT Press (2008)
18. Leavens, G.T., Cheon, Y., Clifton, C., Ruby, C., Cok, D.R.: How the design of JML accommodates both runtime assertion checking and formal verification. Sci. Comput. Program. 55(1-3), 185-208 (2005)
19. Moffett, Y., Beaulieu, A., Dingel, J.: Verifying UML-RT Protocol Conformance Using Model Checking. In: Whittle, J., Clark, T., Kühne, T. (eds.) MODELS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6981, pp. 410-424. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
20. UML Superstructure 2.2. Object Management Group (OMG) (February 2009), http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.2/Superstructure/PDF/
21. Object Constraint Language 2.2. Object Management Group (OMG) (February 2010), http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.2/
22. Oracle: Java™ Platform Debugger Architecture - Structure Overview (2011), http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/jpda/ architecture.html
23. Porres, I., Rauf, I.: From Nondeterministic UML Protocol Statemachines to Class Contracts. In: Int. Conf. on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation, pp. 107-116. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2010)
24. Shah, S.M.A., Anastasakis, K., Bordbar, B.: From UML to Alloy and Back Again. In: Ghosh, S. (ed.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 6002, pp. 158-171. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
25. Soeken, M., Wille, R., Drechsler, R.: Encoding OCL Data Types for SAT-Based Verification of UML/OCL Models. In: Gogolla, M., Wolff, B. (eds.) TAP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6706, pp. 152-170. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
26. Song, H., Huang, G., Chauvel, F., Sun, Y.: Applying MDE Tools at Runtime: Experiments upon Runtime Models. In: Models@run.time, pp. 25-36 (2010)
27. Visser, W., Havelund, K., Brat, G.P., Park, S., Lerda, F.: Model Checking Programs. Autom. Softw. Eng. 10(2), 203-232 (2003)
28. Warmer, J., Kleppe, A.: The Object Constraint Language: Precise Modeling with UML, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley (2003)