The debate about paraphilic coercive disorder is mostly ideological and going nowhere

Archives of Sexual Behavior

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 535-536

  Balon, Richard ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMAN; MALE; NOTE; RAPE; SEXUAL DEVIATION;

DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; PARAPHILIAS; RAPE;

EID: 84864050917     PISSN: 00040002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-011-9892-4     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Blanchard, R. (2011). A brief history of field trials of the DSM diagnostic criteria forparaphilias. [Letter-To-The-Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 861-862.
2. Brotto, L. A. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for Sexual Aversion Disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 271-277.
3. Stern, P. (2010). Paraphilic coercivedisorder inthe DSM: Theright diagnosis for the right reasons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1443-1447.
4. Stern, P. (2011). Wollert (2011) demonstrates again how ideology taints scientific debate. [Letter-To-The-Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1099-1100.
5. Wollert, R. (2011). Paraphilic Coercive Disorder does not belong in DSM-5 for statistical, historical, conceptual, and practical reasons [Letter-Tothe-Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1097-1098.