The impact of complex survey design on prevalence estimates of intakes of food groups in the Australian National Children's Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey

Public Health Nutrition

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1362-1372

  Burden, Sandy ^a   Probst, Yasmine ^a   Steel, David ^a   Tapsell, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Complex survey design; Design effects; Dietary intake

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BODY WEIGHT; CALORIC INTAKE; CHILD; CHILD NUTRITION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NUTRITION; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

ADOLESCENT; AUSTRALIA; BODY WEIGHT; CHILD; CHILD NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ENERGY INTAKE; FOOD HABITS; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NUTRITION SURVEYS;

EID: 84864034695     PISSN: 13689800     EISSN: 14752727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011003326     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing et al. (2009) The 2007 National Children's Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey [Computer file]. Canberra: Australian Social Science Data Archive, The Australian National University.
2. Clark R & Steel DG (2002) The effect of using household as a sampling unit. Int Stat Rev 70, 289-314.
3. Skinner CJ, Holt D & Smith TMF (1989) Analysis of Complex Surveys. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.
4. Chambers RL & Skinner CJ (2003) Analysis of Survey Data. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.
5. Pfeffermann D (1996) The use of sampling weights for survey data analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 5, 239-261. (Pubitemid 126559354)
6. National Center for Health Statistics (2010) Continuous NHANES Web Tutorial: Sample Design. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/tutorials/Nhanes/SurveyDesign/ SampleDesign/intro.htm (accessed August 2010).
7. National Center for Health Statistics (2005) Analytic and Reporting Guidelines for the National Health and NutritionExamination Survey. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/ nhanes-03-04/nhanes-analytic-guidelines- dec-2005.pdf (accessed August 2010).
8. Kish L (1965) Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
9. Kish L (1992) Weighting for unequal Pi. J Official Stat 8, 183-200.
10. Korn EL & Graubard BI (1999) Analysis of Health Surveys. New York: Wiley and Sons.
11. Gabler S, Haeder S & Lahiri P (1999) A model based justificationof Kish's formula for design effects for weighting and clustering. Surv Methodol 25, 105-106.
12. Spencer BD (2000) An approximate design effect for unequal weighting when measurements may correlated with selection probabilities. Surv Methodol 26, 137-138.
13. Gambino J (2009) Design effect caveats. Am Stat 63, 141-146.
14. Park I & Lee H (2004) Design effects for the weighted mean and total estimators under complex survey sampling. Surv Methodol 30, 183-193.
15. Curtin LR, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll M et al. (2006) Estimation and analytic issues for rare events in NHANES. In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association. http://www.amstat.org/ sections/srms/proceedings/y2006/Files/JSM2006-000845.pdf(accessed August 2010).