Applying Bioethical Principles to Place-Based Communities and Cultural Group Protections: The Case of Biomonitoring Results Communication

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 348-358

  Quigley, Dianne ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; BENEFICENCE; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; DECISION MAKING; DUTY TO RECONTACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; BENEFICENCE; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; DECISION MAKING; DUTY TO RECONTACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMANS; PRINCIPLE-BASED ETHICS; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 84864001372     PISSN: 10731105     EISSN: 1748720X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00668.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. S. M. Hays, R. A. Becker, H. W. Leung, L. L. Aylward, and D. W. Pyatt, "Biomonitoring Equivalents: A Screening Approach for Interpreting Biomonitoring Results from a Public Health Perspective, " Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 47, no. 1 (2007): 96-101.
2. Center for Disease Control (CDC), Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, CDC National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, Georgia, 2005.
3. W. G. Foster and J. Agzarian, "Reporting Results of Biomonitoring Studies, " Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 387, no. 1 (January 2007): 137-140.
4. J. G. Brody, R. Morello-Frosch, P. Brown, R. A. Rudel, R. G. Altman, M. Frye, C. A. Osimo, C. Perez, and L. M. Seryak, "Is It Safe?- New Ethics for Reporting Personal Exposures to Environmental Chemicals, " in P. Brown, ed., Perspectives in Medical Sociology, 4th ed. ( Illinois : Waveland Press, Inc. 2008).
5. R. Morello-Frosch, J. G. Brody, P. Brown, R. G. Altman, R. A. Rudel, and C. Perez, "Toxic Ignorance and the Right-to-Know: Ethical and Scientific Dilemmas of Reporting Data in Body Burden Research, " Environmental Health 8, no. 6 (2009): 1-13, available at <> (last visited March 23, 2012).
6. S. Morgen, Into Our Own Hands: The Women's Health Movement in the Unites States, 1969-1990 ( New Jersey : Rutgers University Press, 2002): at chap. 4;.H. Rodriguez-Trias, "Sterilization Abuse, "Women and Health 3, no. 3 (1978): 10-15.
7. J. Lawrence, "The Indian Health Service and the Sterilization of Native American Women, " American Indian Quarterly 24, no. 3 (Summer 2000): 400-419 (December 2011) and T. W. Volscho, "Sterilization Racism and Pan-Ethnic Disparities of the Past Decade: The Continued Encroachment on Reproductive Rights, "Wicazo Sa Review 25, no. 1 (Spring 2010): 17-33.
8. C. Gilligan, In a Different Voice ( Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 1982).
9. T. Pettersen, Comprehending Care ( United Kingdom : Lexington Books, 2008).
10. T. Beauchamp and J. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics (Oxford University Press, 2001).
11. Council for the International Organization of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in Collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), International Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies, Geneva, 2009.
12. M. W. Foster, R. Sharp, W. Freeman, M. Chino, D. Bernsten, and T. Carter, "The Role of Community Review in Evaluating the Risks of Human Genetic Variation Research, " American Journal of Human Genetics 64, no. 6 (1999): 1719-1727
13. H. A. Taylor, R. R. Faden, and N. E. Kass, "The Ethics of Public Health Research: Moral Obligations to Communities, "International Encyclopedia of Public Health (August 2008): 498-503
14. C. Weijer and E. J. Emanuel, "Protecting Communities in Biomedical Research, "Science 289, no. 5482 (August 18, 2000): 1142-1122
15. E. Wallwork, "Ethical Analysis of Research Partnerships with Communities, "Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18, no. 1 (March 2008): 57-85.
16. Id. (Wallwork), at 64.
17. D. Paustenbach and D. Galbraith, "Biomonitoring: Is Body Burden Relevant to Public Health?" Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 44, no. 3 (April 2006): 249-261, at 254.
18. J. S. LaKind, R. Brent, M. J. Dourson, S. Kacew, G. Koren, B. Sonawane, A. Tarzian, and K. Uhl, "Human Milk Biomonitoring Data: Interpretation and Risk Assessment Issues, " Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 68, no. 20, Part A (2005): 1713-1769.
19. M. Harrison, "Applying Bioethical Principles to Human Biomonitoring, " Environmental Health 7, Supp. 1 (2008): S1-8.
20. C. L. Soskolne, "Ethical, Social and Legal Issues Surrounding Studies of Susceptible Populations and Individuals, " Environmental Health Perspectives 105, Supp. 4 (1997): 837-841.
21. See Harrison, supra note 20, at 4.
22. The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects or the "Common Rule" was published in 1991 and codified in separate regulations by 15 Federal departments and agencies. The Health and Human Services regulations, 45 CFR part 46, include four subparts: subpart A, also known as the Federal Policy or the "Common Rule"; subpart B, additional protections for pregnant women, human fetuses, and neonates; subpart C, additional protections for prisoners; and subpart D, additional protections for children. The Common Rule outlines the basic provisions for Institutional Review Boards, human subjects protections based mostly on the Belmont Principles (beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice) and Assurances of Compliance. Most federal agencies and all academic institutions that hold federal funding must abide by the Common Rule.
23. See Harrison, supra note 20, at 4.
24. See Foster et al., supra note 3.
25. See Foster et al., supra note 3, at 139.
26. C. V. Fernandez, E. Kodish, and C. Weijer, "Informing Study Participants of Research Results: An Ethical Imperative, " IRB 25, no. 3 (2003): 12-19.
27. R. Jackson, P. Locke, J. Pirkle, F. Thompson, and D. Sussman, "Will Biomonitoring Change the Way We Regulate Toxic Chemicals?" Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30, no. 3 (2002): 177-183.
28. B. Panikkar, E. Yazzie, and D. Brugge, "The Ethical Issues in Uranium Mining Research in the Navajo Nation, " Accountability in Research 14, no. 2 (2007): 121-153.
29. D. Quigley, A. Lowman, and S. Wing, Tortured Science: Health Studies, Ethics and Nuclear Weapons in the United States ( New York : Baywood Publications, 2011).
30. R. W. Durant, A. T. Legedza, E. R. Marcantonio, M. B. Freeman, and B. E. Landon, "Different Types of Distrust in Clinical Research among Whites and African-Americans, "Journal of National Medical Association 103, no. 2 (February 2011): 123-130
31. L. Crawley, D. Ahn, and M. Winknleby, "Perceived Medical Discrimination and Cancer Screening Behaviors of Racial and Ethnic Minority Adults, "Cancer Epidemiological Biomarkers Prevention 17, no. 8 (August 2008): 1937-1944.
32. J. Betancourt, A. Green, and J. E. Carrillo, "The Challenges of Cross-Cultural Health Care-Diversity, Ethics and the Medical Encounter, "Bioethics Forum 3, no. 16 (2000): 27-32.
33. National Bioethics Advisory Committee (NBAC), Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, 2001, at 5, available through <> (last visited March 2012).
34. S. Gbadegesian and D. Wendler, "Protecting Communities in Health Research from Exploitation, " Bioethics 20, no. 5 (2006): 248-253.
35. D. R. Barnbaum and M. Byron, Research Ethics: Text and Readings ( New Jersey : Prentice Hall Press, 2001): at 147.
36. B. Dumez, K. Van Damme, and L. Casteleyn, "Research on Ethics in Two Human Large Biomonitoring Projects, ECNIS and New Generis: A Bottom Up Approach, " Environmental Health 7, Supp. 1 (2008): S1-7.
37. R. Altman, R. Morello-Frosch, J. Brody, R. Rudel, P. Brown, and M. Averick, "Pollution Comes Home and Gets Personal: Women's Experience of Household Toxic Exposure, "Journal of Health and Social Behavior 49, no. 4 (2008): 417-435
38. J. G. Brody, R. Morello-Frosch, A. Zota, P. Brown, C. Perez, and R. Rudel, "Linking Exposure Assessment Science with Policy Objectives for Environmental Justice and Breast Cancer Advocacy: The Northern California Exposure Study, "American Journal of Public Health 99
39. A precautionary benefit derives from the "precautionary principle, " described in C. Raffensberger and J. Tickner, ed., Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1999). Raffensberger and Tickner describe the precautionary principle which proposes that we take preventive action in the face of uncertain harmful effects from toxic exposures; those who create these risks should have the responsibility to study and prevent these risks; alternatives to these toxic exposures should be developed; and public participation and increasing transparency should be part of the decision-making around these risks.