Subchondral bone density distribution in the human femoral head

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 677-683

  Wright, David A ^a   Meguid, Michael ^a   Lubovsky, Omri ^a   Whyne, Cari M ^a  

^a Canada   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bone density distribution; Computed tomography; Femoral head; Subchondral bone

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL MECHANICAL AXIS; FEMUR HEAD; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; POSTERIOR CONDYLAR AXIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SUBCHONDRAL BONE;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HUMANS; MALE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84863983074     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: 14322161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1270-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Wolff J. The law of bone remodeling. New York: Berlin Heidelberg; 1986.
2. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34(7):859-71. (Pubitemid 32530054)
3. Radin EL, Rose RM. Role of subchondral bone in the initiation and progression of cartilage damage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;213:34-40. 213.
4. Grynpas MD, Alpert B, Katz I, Lieberman I, Pritzker KP. Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991;49 (1):20-6.
5. Pastoureau PC, Chomel AC, Bonnet J. Evidence of early subchondral bone changes in the meniscectomized guinea pig. A densitometric study using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry subregional analysis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 1999;7(5):466-73. (Pubitemid 29468741)
6. Hofstaetter JG, Roschger P, Klaushofer K, Kim HK. Increased matrix mineralization in the immature femoral head following ischemic osteonecrosis. Bone. 2010;46(2):379-85.
7. Johnston JD, McLennan CE, Hunter DJ, Wilson DR. In vivo precision of a depth-specific topographic mapping technique in the CT analysis of osteoarthritic and normal proximal tibial subchondral bone density. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(8):1057-64.
8. Lubovsky O, Wright D, Hardisty M, Kiss A, Kreder HJ, Whyne C. Importance of the dome and posterior wall as evidenced by bone density mapping in the acetabulum. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26(3):262-6.
9. Dalstra M, Huiskes R. Load transfer across the pelvic bone. J Biomech. 1995;28(6):715-24.
10. Dewire P, Simkin PA. Subchondral plate thickness reflects tensile stress in the primate acetabulum. J Orthop Res. 1996;14(5):838-41. (Pubitemid 26376532)
11. Harada Y, Wevers HW, Cooke TD. Distribution of bone strength in the proximal tibia. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3(2):167-75.
12. Johnston JD, Masri BA, Wilson DR. Computed tomography topographic mapping of subchondral density (CT-TOMASD) in osteoarthritic and normal knees: methodological development and preliminary findings. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(10):1319-26.
13. Wright D, Whyne C, Hardisty M, Kreder HJ, Lubovsky O. Functional and anatomic orientation of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1754-1.
14. Elke RP, Cheal EJ, Simmons C, Poss R. Three-dimensional anatomy of the cancellous structures within the proximal femur from computed tomography data. J Orthop Res. 1995;13(4):513-23.
15. Stiehl JB, Jacobson D, Carrera G. Morphological analysis of the proximal femur using quantitative computed tomography. Int Orthop. 2007;31(3):287-92. (Pubitemid 46800757)
16. Brown TD, Shaw DT. In vitro contact stress distributions in the natural human hip. J Biomech. 1983;16(6):373-84. (Pubitemid 13014398)