Multi-view automatic target recognition using joint sparse representation

IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 2481-2497

  Zhang, Haichao ^a   Nasrabadi, Nasser M ^b   Zhang, Yanning ^c   Huang, Thomas S ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AZIMUTH ANGLES; LINEAR SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; MULTI-VIEWS; MULTIPLE JOINTS; MULTIPLE VIEWS; PUBLIC DATABASE; SPARSE REPRESENTATION; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS; STATIONARY TARGETS;

AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84863979867     PISSN: 00189251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2012.6237604     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bhanu, B., et al. Guest editorial introduction to the special issue on automatic target detection and recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6, 1 (Jan. 1997), 1-6.
2. Martone, A., Innocenti, R., and Ranney, K. Moving target indication for transparent urban structures. U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Technical Report, May 2009.
3. Novak, L. M., Owirka, G. J., and Brower, W. S. An efficient multi-target SAR ATR algorithm. In Proceedings of the 23rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 1998.
4. Schumacher, R. and Rosenbach, K. ATR of battlefield targets by SAR classification results using the public MSTAR dataset compared with a dataset by QinetiQ, UK. In RTO SET Symposium on Target Identification and Recognition Using RF Systems, 2004.
5. Jones, III, G. and Bhanu, B. Quasi-invariants for recognition of articulated and non-standard objects in SAR images. In IEEE Workshop on Computer Vision Beyond the Visible Spectrum: Methods and Applications, 1999.
6. Patnaik, R. and Casasent, D. SAR classification and confuser and clutter rejection tests on MSTAR ten-class data using MINACE filters. Optical Pattern Recognition, 6574 (2007), 657402.1-657402.15.
7. Patnaik, R. and Casasent, D. MINACE filter classification algorithms for ATR using MSTAR data. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5807, 2008, pp. 100-111. (Pubitemid 41545318)
8. Marinelli, A. M. P., Kaplan, L. M., and Nasrabadi, N. M. SAR ATR using learning vector quantization. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3647, 1999.
9. Principe, J. C., Xu, D., and Fisher, III, J. W. Pose estimation in SAR using an information theoretic criterion. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3370, 1998, pp. 218-229.
10. Zhao, Q., Xu, D., and Principe, J. C. Pose estimation for SAR automatic target recognition. In Proceedings of the Image Understanding Workshop, 1998, pp. 827-832.
11. Sun, Y., et al. Adaptive boosting for SAR automatic target recognition. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 43, 1 (2007), 112-125. (Pubitemid 46773709)
12. Vespe, M., Baker, C. J., and Griffiths, H. D. Radar target classification using multiple perspectives. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 1, 4 (2007), 300-307. (Pubitemid 47014330)
13. Liao, X., Runkle, P., and Carin, L. Identification of ground targets from sequential high-range-resolution radar signatures. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 38, 4 (Oct. 2002), 1230-1242.
14. Nishimoto, M., Liao, X., and Carin, L. Target identification from multi-aspect high range-resolution radar signatures using a hidden Markov model. IEICE Transactions on Electronics, E87-C, 10 (Oct. 2004), 1706-1714.
15. Ranney, K., Khatri, H., and Nguyen, L. H. SAR prescreener enhancement through multi-look processing. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5415, 2004.
16. Ranney, K. and Soumekh, M. Signal subspace change detection in averaged multilook SAR imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44, 1 (Jan. 2006), 201-213.
17. Xiao, J. and Shah, M. Automatic target recognition using multi-view morphing. In Proceedings of SPIE, Automatic Target Recognition XIV, vol. 5426, 2004, pp. 391-399.
18. Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York: Springer, 2006.
19. Cristianini, N. and Shawe-Taylor, J. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
20. Wright, J., et al. Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31, 2 (Feb 2009), 210-227.
21. Donoho, D. L. For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal l1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 59 (2004), 797-829.
22. Tropp, J. A. and Gilbert, A. C. Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53, 12 (2007), 4655-4666.
23. Dai, W. and Milenkovic, O. Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing: Closing the gap between performance and complexity. The Computing Research Repository, (2008).
24. Needell, D. and Tropp, J. A. CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 26, 3 (2009), 301-321.
25. Grosse, R., et al. Shift-invariant sparse coding for audio classification. In Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2007.
26. Potter, L. C., Schniter, P., and Ziniel, J. Sparse reconstruction for RADAR. In Edmund G. Zelnio and Frederick D. Garber (Eds.), Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery XIV, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 6970, 2008, pp. 697003-697003-15.
27. Elad, M., Figueiredo, M. A. T., and Ma, Y. On the role of sparse and redundant representations in image processing. Proceedings of the IEEE-Special Issue on Applications of Sparse Representation & Compressive Sensing, 98, 6 (2010), 972-982.
28. Wright, J., et al. Sparse representation for computer vision and pattern recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE-Special Issue on Applications of Sparse Representation & Compressive Sensing, 98, 6 (2010), 1031-1044.
29. Lee, H., et al. Efficient sparse coding algorithms. In Proceedings of the Advanced Neural Information Processing Systems, 2007, pp. 801-808.
30. Donoho, D. L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52, 4 (Apr. 2006), 1289-1306.
31. Duarte, M. F., Cevher, V., and Baraniuk, R. G. Model-based compressive sensing for signal ensembles. In Proceedings of the Allerton Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing, 2009.
32. Huang, K. and Aviyente, S. Sparse representation for signal classification. In Proceedings of the Advanced Neural Information Processing Systems, 2006.
33. Majumdar, A. and Ward, R. K. Classification via group sparsity promoting regularization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2009.
34. Chen, Y., Nasrabadi, N. M., and Tran, T. D. Sparse representation for target detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 5, 3 (2011), 629-640.
35. Pillai, J. K., Patel, V. M., and Chellappa, R. Sparsity inspired selection and recognition of IRIS images. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Biometrics, Technology and Systems, 2009, pp. 1-6.
36. Patel, V. M., Nasrabadi, N. M., and Chellappa, R. Sparsity-motivated automatic target recognition. Applied Optics, 50, 10 (2011), 1425-1433.
37. Estabridis, K. Automatic target recognition via sparse representations. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7696, 2010.
38. Thiagarajan, J. J., et al. Sparse representations for automatic target classification in SAR images. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing, 2010.
39. Roweis, S. T. and Saul, L. K. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 290, 5500 (2000), 2323-2326. (Pubitemid 32041578)
40. Yu, K., Zhang, T., and Gong, Y. Nolinear learning using local coordinate coding. In Proceedings of the Advanced Neural Information Processing Systems, 2009. Haichao Zhang (S'10) received the B.Eng. degree in computer science from Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China, in 2007, where he is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree. His research interests include the sparse representation and its applications in pattern recognition and signal processing.
41. Tropp, J. A., Gilbert, A. C., and Strauss, M. J. Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, (2006), 589-602.
42. Chen, J. and Huo, X. Theoretical results on sparse representations of multiple-measurement vectors. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54 (Dec. 2006), 4634-4643. (Pubitemid 46405606)
43. Engan, K., et al. Sparse solutions to linear inverse problems with multiple measurement vectors. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53, 7 (July 2005), 2477-2488. (Pubitemid 41174440)
44. Rakotomamonjy, A. Surveying and comparing simultaneous sparse approximation (or group lasso) algorithms. University of Rouen, France, Technical Report, 2010.
45. Yuan, M. and Lin, Y. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 2006.
46. Mossing, J. C. and Ross, T. D. An evaluation of SAR ATR algorithm performance sensitivity to MSTAR extended operating conditions. In E. G. Zelnio (Ed.), Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery V, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3370, 1998, pp. 554-565.
47. Yang, A. Y., et al. Feature selection in face recognition: A sparse representation perspective. University of California Berkeley, Technical Report UCB/EECS-2007-99, 2007.
48. Chang, C-C. and Lin, C-J. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. 2001. Available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm.
49. Jones, III, G. and Bhanu, B. Recognition of articulated and occluded objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21, 7 (July 1999), 603-613.