Emotion in the turing test: A downward trend for machines in recent Loebner Prizes

Handbook of Research on Synthetic Emotions and Sociable Robotics: New Applications in Affective Computing and Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 325-349

  Shah, Huma ^a   Warwick, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863911506     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-354-8.ch017     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Block, N. (1981). Psychologism and Behaviourism. The Philosophical Review LXXXX, 1, 5-43.
2. Callejas, Z., & López-Cózar, R. (2008). Influence of contextual information in emotion annotation for spoken dialogue systems. Speech communication, 50, 416-433.
3. Carpenter, R. (2007). Jabberwacky: Communication, companionship, intelligence. Retrieved February 12, 2007, from http://www.jabberwacky.com/
4. Colby, K.M., Hilf, F.D., Weber, S., & Kraemer, H.C. (1972). Turing-like indistinguishability tests for the validation of a computer simulation of paranoid processes. Artificial Intelligence, 3, 199-221.
5. Damasio, A.R. (1996). Descartes' error - Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Papermac.
6. Derks, D., Fischer, A.H., & Bos, A.E.R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 766-785.
7. French, R (1990). Subcognition and the limits of the Turing Test. Mind, 99(393), 53-65.
8. Edmonds, B. (2008). The social embedding of intelligence: Towards a machine that could pass the turing test. In: R. Epstein, G. Roberts & G. Beber (Eds.), Parsing the Turing Test: Philosophical and methodological issues in the quest for the thinking computer. Springer Science.
9. Harnad, S. (2001a). What's wrong and right about searle's chinese room argument? In: M. Bishop & J. Preston (Eds.) Essays on Searle's Chinese room argument. Oxford University Press.
10. Hanard, S. (2001b). Minds, Machines and Turing: The indistinguishability of indistinguishable. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information - special issue on Alan Turing and Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved December 18, 2006, from http://www.wkap.nl/journalhome.htm/0925-8531.
11. Hanard, S. (1992). The Turing Test is not a trick: Turing indistinguishability is a scientific criterion. SIGART Bulletin 3(4), 9-10.
12. Levy, D. (2007). Love, Sex and Robots - the evolution of human-robot relationships. (uncorrected proof). London: Duckworth.
13. Loebner, H. (2008). Home page of the Loebner Prize in artificial intelligence. Retrieved February 12, 2007, from http://www.loebner.net/Prizef/loebner-prize.html.
14. Loebner Results (2003). University of Surrey. Retrieved February 9, 2008, from http://loebner03. hamill.co.uk/
15. Maria, K.A., & Zitar, R.A. (2007). Emotional agents: A modeling and an application. Information and Software Technology, 49, 695-716.
16. Mayer, J.D., Caruso, D., & Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267-298.
17. Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D.R. (2000). Models of emotional intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 396-420). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Minsky, M. (2007). Once more with feelings. In interview with Amanda Gefter. New Scientist, February, 48-49
19. Morrison, D., Wang, R., & Liyanage C. De Silva. (2007). Ensemble methods for spoken emotion recognition in call-centres. Speech Communication, 49, 98-112.
20. Pinker, S. (2008). Institute of Social Psychology 'Psychology as Social Science' public lecture, London School of Economics. Stuff of Thought: Language as a window into human nature. June 9, London, UK.
21. Saygin, A.P., & Cicekli, I. (2002). Pragmatics in human-computer conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 227-258.
22. Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (2008). Can a machine tell a joke? European conference on computing and philosophy. Montpellier, France, 16-18 June.
23. Shah, H., & Warwick, K. (in press) Constraining Random dialogue in a modern eliza. In C.T.A. Schmidt (Ed.), Essays on computers and philosophy: From man through to artefacts to man. AAAI/MIT
24. Shah, H. (2005). Alice: An Ace in Digitaland. Special issue of on-line journal TripleC: Cognition, Communication and Cooperation - selected papers from 2005 European Computing and Philosophy Conference, 4(2), 284-292. Retrieved from, http://triplec.uti.at/articles.php
25. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. London: Wiley.
26. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675-735.
27. Turing, A.M., Braithwaite, R., Jefferson, G., & Newman, M. (1952). Can automatic calculating machines be said to think? In J. Copeland (Ed.), The Essential Turing - the ideas that gave birth to the computer age (pp 487-506). Clarendon Press: Oxford.
28. Turing, A.M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236).
29. Wallace, R. (2007). A.L.I.C.E - artificial linguistic internet computer entity. Retrieved November 23, 2007, from http://www.alicebot.org
30. Yip, J.A., & Martin, R.A. (2006). Sense of humor, emotional intelligence, and social competence. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1202-1208.