The effects of laser microtexturing of the dental implant collar on crestal bone levels and peri-implant health

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 492-498

  Botos, Spyros ^a   Yousef, Hoda ^a   Zweig, Barry ^a   Flinton, Robert ^a   Weiner, Saul ^a  

^a RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biologic width; Crestal bone; Implant collar; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LASER; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIODONTICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PLAQUE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PLAQUE INDEX; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LASERS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84863902016     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Albrektsson T. On long term maintenance of the osseointegrated response. Aust Prosthodont J 1993; 75: 15-24.
2. Brånemark PI. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985.
3. Herman JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, et al. Biological width around titanium implants. A physiologically formed and stable dimension overtime. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 1-9.
4. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the peri-implant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23: 971-973.
5. Hansson S. The implant neck: Smooth or provided with retention elements. A biochemical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 394-405.
6. Ricci JL, Charvet J, Frenkel S, et al. Bone response to laser microtextured surfaces. In: Davies JE (ed). Bone Engineering. Toronto: Em2, 2000:282-294.
7. Alexander H, Ricci JL, Hrico GJ. Mechanical basis for bone retention around dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 23: 200-210.
8. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schuerch E Jr, Lang NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987; 2: 145-151.
9. Brunette DM. The effect of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 3: 231-246.
10. Dolby MJ, Childs S, Riehle MO, Johnstone HJH, Affrossman S, Curtis ASG. Fibroblast reaction to island topography:Changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 927-935.
11. Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the boneimplant interface. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 2311-2321.
12. Inoue T, Cox JE, Pilliar RM, Melcher AH. Effect of the surface geometry of smooth and porous-coated titanium alloy on the orientation of fibroblasts in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21: 107-126.
13. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, Geis-Gertorfer J. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4087-4103.
14. Meyer U, Joos U, Mythill J, et al. Ultrastructural characterization of the implant/bone interface of immediately loaded dental implants. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1959-1967.
15. Weiner S, Simon J, Ehrenberg D, Zweig B, Ricce J. The effects of laser microtextured collar upon crestal bone levels of dental implants. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 217-228.
16. Callan DP, O’Makory AB, Cobb CM. Loss of crestal bone around dental implants: A retrospective study. Implant Dent 1998; 7: 258-266.
17. Ettinger RL, Jakoben J. Caries: A problem in an overdenture population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1990; 18: 42-45.
18. Pecora GE, Ceccarelli R, Bonelli M, Alexander H, Ricce JL. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bony attachment to dental implants. Implant Dent 2009; 18: 57-66.
19. Taylor RC, McGlumphy EA, Tatakis DN, Beck FM. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of single tooth Biolok implants: A 5-year study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 849-854.
20. Schwartz F, Herten M, Bieling K, Becker J. Crestal bone changes at nonsubmerged implants (Camlog) with different machined collar lengths: A histomorphometric pilot study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 335-342.
21. Al-Sayyed A, Deports DA, Pilliar RM, Watson PA, Berhane K, Carter S. Predictable crestal bone remodelling around two porous-coated titanium alloy dental implant designs. A radiographic study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Re s 1994; 5: 131-141.
22. Hammerle CHF, Bragger G, Burgin W, Lang MR. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implant Res 1996; 7: 111-119.
23. Ichikawa T, Kanitani H, Wigianto R, Kawamoto N, Matsumoto N. Influence of bone quality on the stress distribution: An in vitro experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:18-22
24. Hansson S, Norton M. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech 1999; 32: 829-836.
25. Listgarten MA, Lang NP, Schroeder HE, Schroeder A. Periodontal tissues and their counterparts around endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991; 2: 1-19.
26. Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 186-198.
27. Johansson CB, Hansson HA, Albrektsson T. Qualitative interfacial study between bone and tantalum, niobium or commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials 1990; 11: 277-280.
28. Bae HEK, Chung M-K, Cha I-H, Han D-H. Marginal tissue response to different implant neck design. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2008; 46: 602-609.
29. Nevins M, Nevins ML, Camelo M, Boyesen J, Kim D. Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 111-121.
30. Small PN, Tarnow DP. Gingival recession around implants: A 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 527-532.
31. Chiapasco M, Abati S, Romeo E, Vogel G. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Brånemark System MK II implants: A prospective comparative study between delayed and immediate loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 6: 537-546.
32. Chiapasco M, Gatti C. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: A 3- to 8-year prospective study on 328 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 29-38.
33. Cooper L, Scurria M, Lang L, Guckes A, Moriarty J, Felton D. Treatment of edentulism using Astra Tech implants and ball abutments to retain mandibular overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 646-653.
34. Van Kampen F, Cune M, Van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and post-insertion maintenance of bar clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment:An in vivo comparison after 3 months in function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 720-726.