Writing and Reviewing Manuscripts in the Multidimensional World of Qualitative Research

Journal of Marriage and Family

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 643-659

  Larossa, Ralph ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Qualitative research; Social context; Theory construction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863876670     PISSN: 00222445     EISSN: 17413737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00978.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of "theory." Sociological Theory, 26, 173-199. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00324.x.
2. Aldous, J. (1970). Strategies for developing family theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 250-257. DOI: 10.2307/350131.
3. Ambert, A.-M., Adler, P. A., Adler, P., & Detzner, D. F. (1995). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 879-893. DOI: 10.2307/353409.
4. Becker, H. W. (1958). Problems of inference and proof in participation observation. American Sociological Review, 23, 652-660. DOI: 10.2307/2089053.
5. Bengtson, V., Acock, A., Allen, K., Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Klein, D. (Eds.). (2005a). Sourcebook of family theory and research: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Bengtson, V., Acock, A., Allen, K., Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Klein, D. (2005b). Theories and theorizing in family research: Puzzle building and puzzle solving. In V. Bengtson, A. Acock, K. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research: An interactive approach (pp. 3-33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Boss, P. (1999). Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Boss, P. (2004). Ambiguous loss research, theory, and practice: Reflections after 9/11. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 551-566. DOI: 10.1111/j. 0022-2445.2004.00037.x.
9. Boss, P., Doherty, W. J., LaRossa, R., Schumm, W. R., & Steinmetz, S. K. (Eds.). (1993). Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach. New York: Plenum Press.
10. Brekhus, W., Galliher, J. F., & Gubrium, J. F. (2005). The need for thin description. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 1-19. DOI: 10.1177/1077800405280663.
11. Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., & Reiss, I. L. (Eds.). (1979). Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1). New York: Free Press.
12. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
13. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Using codes and code manuals: A template organizing style of interpretation. In B. F. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Cresswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Cutcliffe, J. R. (2005). Adapt or adopt: Developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51, 421-428. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005. 03514.x.
17. Daly, K. (1997). Re-placing theory in ethnography: A postmodern view. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 343-365. DOI: 10.1177/107780049700300306.
18. Daly, K. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies and human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Daniels, A. K. (1987). Invisible work. Social Problems, 34, 403-415. DOI: 10.1525/sp.1987.34.5. 03a00020.
20. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005a). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005b). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. DiMaggio, P. J. (1995). Comments on "What theory is not." Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 391-397. DOI: 10.2307/2393790.
23. Doherty, W. J., Boss, P. G., LaRossa, R., Schumm, W. R., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1993). Family theories and methods: A contextual approach. In P. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 3-30). New York: Plenum Press.
24. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Frieze, I. H. (2008). Publishing qualitative research in Sex Roles. Sex Roles, 58, 1-2. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-007-9376-0.
26. Gilgun, J. F. (1999). Methodological pluralism and qualitative family research. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 219-261). New York: Plenum Press.
27. Gilgun, J. F. (2005). Qualitative research and family psychology. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 40-50. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.40.
28. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
29. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1965). Awareness of dying. Chicago: Aldine.
30. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
31. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
32. Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483-496. DOI: 10.2307/2092933.
33. Goodwin, J., & Horowitz, R. (2002). The methodological strengths and dilemmas of qualitative sociology. Qualitative Sociology, 25, 33-47. DOI: 10. 1023/A:1014300123105.
34. Guetzkow, J., Lamont, M., & Mallard, G. (2004). What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences? American Sociological Review, 69, 190-212. DOI: 10.1177/000312240406900203.
35. Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551-575. DOI: 10.1086/227049.
36. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). Constructing the life course (2nd ed.). Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
37. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38. LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 837-857. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00179.x.
39. LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135-163). New York: Plenum Press.
40. LaRossa, R., & Wolf, J. H. (1985). On qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 531-541. DOI: 10.2307/352256.
41. Lofland, J., Snow, D., Anderson, L., & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
42. Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14, 227-249. DOI: 10. 1093/pan/mpj017.
43. Matthews, S. H. (2005). Crafting qualitative research articles on marriages and families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 799-808. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00176.x.
44. Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 475-482. DOI: 10.1177/1077800410364740.
45. Mullaney, J. L. (2007). Telling it like a man: Masculinities and battering men's accounts of their violence. Men and Masculinities, 10, 222-247. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X06287758.
46. Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently... and why. New York: Free Press.
47. Orbuch, T. L. (1997). People's accounts count: The sociology of accounts. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 455-478. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc. 23.1.455.
48. Prus, R. (1987). Generic social processes: Maximizing conceptual development in ethnographic research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16, 250-293. DOI: 10.1177/0891241687163002.
49. Puddephatt, A. J., Shaffir, W., & Kleinknecht, S. W. (Eds.). (2009). Ethnographies revisited: Constructing theory in the field. London: Routledge.
50. Ragin, C. C., Nagel, J., & White, P. (2004). Workshop on scientific foundations of qualitative research. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
51. Reed, I. A. (2011). Interpretation and social knowledge: On the use of theory in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 334-340. DOI: 10.1002/1098-240X (200008)23:4 <334:: AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.
53. Sandelowski, M. (2010). What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing and Health, 33, 77-84. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20362.
54. Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62. DOI: 10. 2307/2092239.
55. Signs: Journal of Women and Culture. (2011). Statement of policy. Retrieved from.
56. S.M.G. to Angelo Patri, 13 February 1933, Box 24, Angelo Patri Papers, Library of Congress, Washington, DC.
57. Snow, D. A. (2004). Thoughts on alternative pathways to theoretical development: Theory generation, extension, and refinement. In C. C. Ragin, J. Nagel, & P. White (Eds.), Workshop on scientific foundations of qualitative research (pp. 133-136). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
58. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371-384. DOI: 10.2307/2393788.
62. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Wade, N. (2010, December 10). Anthropology a science? The experts disagree. The New York Times, p. A14.
64. Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 385-390. DOI: 10.2307/2393789.
65. White, J. M., & Klein, D. M. (2008). Family theories (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Zerubavel, E. (1997). Social mindscapes: An invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Zerubavel, E. (2007). Generally speaking: The logic and mechanics of social pattern analysis. Sociological Forum, 22, 131-145. doi:10.1111/j. 1573-7861.2007.00010.x.