Erratum: Comparing the in vivo sonodynamic effects of dual-and single-frequency ultrasound in breast adenocarcinoma (Journal of Medical Ultrasonics (2012) 39 (115-125) DOI 10.1007/s10396-012-0348-9);Comparing the in vivo sonodynamic effects of dual- and single-frequency ultrasound in breast adenocarcinoma

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 115-125

  Alamolhoda, Mahboobeh ^a   Mokhtari Dizaji, Manijhe ^a   Barati, Amir Hoshang ^b   Hasanzadeh, Hadi ^c  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b KURDISTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c SEMNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Dual frequency ultrasound; Hematoporphyrin; Inertial cavitation; Sonodynamic therapy (SDT)

Indexed keywords

HEMATOPORPHYRIN; WATER;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTINEOPLASTIC ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BREAST ADENOCARCINOMA; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER INHIBITION; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND; FEMALE; IN VIVO STUDY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SINGLE FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND; TUMOR VOLUME; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 84863873373     PISSN: 13464523     EISSN: 16132254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10396-012-0391-6     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. Liu Q, Li X, Xiao L, Wang P, Wang X, Tang W. Sonodynamically induced antitumor effect of hematoporphyrin on Hepatoma 22. Ultrason Sonochem. 2008;15:943-8.
2. Yumita N, Nishigaki R, Umemura S. Sonodynamically induced antitumor effect of Photofrin II on colon 26 carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2000;126:601-6.
3. Yumita N, Umemura S. Sonodynamic therapy with Photofrin II on AH130 solid tumor. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003;51: 174-8.
4. Tomankova K, Kolarova H, Kolar P, Kejlova K, Jirova D. Study of cytotoxic effect of photodynamically and sonodynamically activated sensitizers in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro. 2009;23:1465-71.
5. Bailey MR, Khokhlova VA, Sapozhnikov OA, Kargl SG, Crum LA. Physical mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of ultrasound: a review. Acoust Phys. 2003;49:369-88. (Pubitemid 37056472)
6. Umemura S, Yumita N, Nishigaki R, Umemura K. Mechanism of cell damage by ultrasound in combination with hematoporphyrin. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1990;81:962-6. (Pubitemid 20283767)
7. Barnett S. Cavitation - its nature, detection and measurement. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:S11-21. (Pubitemid 128713211)
8. Neppiras EA, Noltingk BE. Cavitation produced by ultrasonics: theoretical conditions for the onset of cavitation. Proc Phys Soc. 1951;12:1032-8.
9. Laborde JL, Bouyer C, Caltagirone JP, Gerard A. Acoustic cavitation field prediction at low and high frequency ultrasounds. Ultrasonics. 1998;36:581-7. (Pubitemid 128390704)
10. Liu HL, Hsieh CM. Single transducer dual frequency ultrasound generation to enhance acoustic cavitation. Ultrason Sonochem. 2009;16:431-8.
11. Barati AH, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Mozdarani H, Bathaie SZ, Hassan ZM. Effect of exposure parameters on cavitation induced by low level dual frequency ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem. 2007;14:783-9. (Pubitemid 46783677)
12. Brotchie A, Grieser F, Ashokkumar M. Sonochemistry and sonoluminescence under dual frequency ultrasound irradiation in the presence of water soluble solutes. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112: 10247-50.
13. Zheng H, Mukdadi O, Kim H, Hertzberg JR, Shandas R. Advantages in using multifrequency excitation of contrast microbubbles for enhancing echo particle image velocimetry techniques: initial numerical studies using rectangular and triangular waves. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:99-108. (Pubitemid 40093951)
14. Servant G, Laborde JL, Hita A, Caltagirone JP, Gerard A. On the interaction between ultrasound waves and bubble clouds in mono and dual frequency sonoreactors. Ultrason Sonochem. 2003;10:347-55. (Pubitemid 36970096)
15. Iernetti G, Ciuti P, Dezhkunov NV, Reali M, Francescutto A, Johri GK. Enhancement of high frequency acoustic cavitation effects by a low frequency stimulation. Ultrason Sonochem. 1997;4:263-8.
16. Tachibana K, Feril LB Jr, Ikeda-Dantsuji Y. Sonodynamic therapy. Ultrasonics. 2008;48:253-9.
17. Rosenthal I, Sostaric JZ, Riesz P. Sonodynamic therapy: a review of the synergistic effects of drugs and ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem. 2004;11:349-63. (Pubitemid 39070478)
18. Kessel D, Jeffers R, Fowlkes JB, Cain C. Porphyrin-induced enhancement of ultrasound cytotoxicity. Int J Radiat Biol. 1994;66:221-8. (Pubitemid 24285387)
19. Warthington AE, Thompson J, Lalonde R, Patterson M, Rauth AM, Hunt JW. Mechanism of ultrasound enhanced porphyrin cytotoxcity: free radical and hematoporphyrin effect. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23:1095-105. (Pubitemid 27387848)
20. Yumita N, Okuyama N, Sasaki K, Umemura S. Sonodynamic therapy on chemically induced mammary tumor: pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution and sonodynamically induced antitumor effect of porfimer sodium. Cancer Sci. 2004;95:765-9. (Pubitemid 39335098)
21. Tochner Z, Mitchell JB, Harrington FS, Smith P, Russo DT, Russo A. Treatment of murine intraperitoneal ovarian ascitic tumor with hematoporphyrin derivative and laser light. Cancer Res. 1985;45:2983-7. (Pubitemid 15007161)
22. Chekulayeva LV, Chekulayev VA, Shevchuk IN. Active oxygen intermediates in the degradation of hematoporphyrin derivative in tumor cells subjected to photodynamic therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2008;93:94-107.
23. Huang J, Feng R, Zhu C, Chen Z. Low-MHz frequency effect on a sonochemical reaction determined by an electrical method. Ultrason Sonochem. 1995;2:93-7.
24. Barati AH, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Mozdarani H, Bathaie SZ, Hassan ZM. Treatment of murine tumors using dual frequency ultrasound in an experimental in vivo model. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:756-63.
25. Teicher BA. Tumor model in cancer research. Totawa: Human Press; 2002. p. 407-49.
26. Barati AH, Mokhtari-Dizaji M. Ultrasound dose fractionation in sonodynamic therapy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:880-7.
27. Austerlitz C, de Souza VLB, Campos DMT, Kurachi C, Bagnato C, Sibata C. Enhanced response of the Fricke solution doped with hematoporphyrin under X-rays irradiation. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2008;51:271-9. (Pubitemid 351960943)
28. Bloom-Richardson Grade for Breast Cancer, Cancer Reporting in California: Abstracting and Coding Procedures for Hospitals (California Cancer Reporting System Standards, vol. I). 2007;3-8.
29. Suslick KS, Flannigan DJ. Inside a collapsing bubble: sonoluminescence and the conditions during cavitation. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2008;59:659-83. (Pubitemid 351703400)
30. Wang S, Huang B, Wang Y, Liao L. Comparison of enhancement of pentachlorophenol sonolysis at 20 kHz by dual frequency sonication. Ultrason Sonochem. 2006;13:506-10. (Pubitemid 44051965)
31. Ciuti P, Dezhkunov NV, Francescutto A, Kulak AL, Iernetti G. Cavitation activity stimulation by low frequency field pulses. Ultrason Sonochem. 2000;7:213-6.
32. Tang HW, Blankschtein D, Langer R. An investigation of the role of cavitation in low frequency ultrasound mediated transdermal drug transport. Pharm Res. 2002;19:1160-9. (Pubitemid 34985000)
33. Kanthale PM, Brotchie A, Ashokkumar M, Grieser F. Experimental and theoretical investigations on sonoluminescence under dual frequency conditions. Ultrason Sonochem. 2008;15:629-35. (Pubitemid 351726280)
34. Hasanzadeh H, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Bathaie SZ, Hassan ZM. Evaluation of correlation between chemical dosimetry and subharmonic spectrum analysis to examine the acoustic cavitation. Ultrason Sonochem. 2010;17:863-9.
35. Hasanzadeh H, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Bathaie SZ, Hassan ZM, Nilchiani V, Goudarzi H. Enhancement and control of acoustic cavitation yield by low level dual frequency sonication: a subharmonic analysis. Ultrason Sonochem. 2011;18:394-400.