How to get your model results used: A guide to stakeholder engagement

Geological Society Special Publication

Volumn 364, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 39-48

  Hughes, A G ^a   Van Wonderen, J J ^b   Rees, J G ^a   Seymour, K J ^c   Manful, D ^d,e   Karl, H ^f,g  

^a Dinglesy Dunham Centre   (United Kingdom)

^b MOTT MACDONALD   (United Kingdom)

^c ENVIRONMENT AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^f MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^g ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY NEW ENGLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; MODELING; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM; WALES;

EID: 84863867317     PISSN: 03058719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1144/SP364.4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Burgess D. Groundwater Resource Management in Eastern England: a Quest for Environmentally Sustainable Development 2002, 193:53-62. Geological Society, London, Special Publications.
2. Cash D W, Borck J C, Patt A G. Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making comparative analysis of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Science, Technology & Human Values 2006, 31:465-494.
3. 2008, EU Switch, World Wide Web Address: www.switchurbanwater.eu (accessed 12 December 2008).
4. Gray D A. Ground-water Conditions of the Chalk of the Grimsby Area, Lincolnshire 1964, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Water Supply Papers of the Geological Survey of Great Britain. Research Report No. 1.
5. Hill M C, Tiedeman C R. Effective Groundwater Model Calibration: with Analysis of Data, Sensitivities, Predictions and Uncertainty 2007, Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons.
6. Hughes A G, Mansour M M, Robins N S, Cheeseman M. The use of groundwater models as arbiters: a case study from the UK. 2007, 198-203. Copenhagen, Pre-published proceedings of ModelCARE 2007 Conference: Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modelling - Credibility in Modelling.
7. Hulme P J, Jackson C R, Atkins J K, Hughes A G, Mansour M M, Seymour K J, Wilson K, Shepley M G, Whiteman M I, Hulme P J, Grout M W. A rapid model for estimating the depletion in river flows due to groundwater abstraction. Groundwater Resources Modelling: A Case Study from the UK 2012, 364:289-302. Geological Society, London, Special Publications.
8. Hutchinson M J, Ingram R G S, Grout M W, Hayes P J, Shepley M G, Whiteman M I, Hulme P J, Grout M W. A successful model: 30 years of the Lincolnshire Chalk Model. Groundwater Resources Modelling: A Case Study from the UK 2012, 364:173-191. Geological Society, London, Special Publications.
9. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K B, Tignor M, Miller H L. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 99. IPCC, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
10. Jackson C R, Meister R, Prudhomme C. Modelling the effects of climate change and its uncertainty on UK Chalk groundwater resources from an ensemble of global climate model projections. Journal of Hydrology 2010, 399:12-28.
11. Karl H A, Susskind L E, Wallace K H. A dialogue, not a diatribe, effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environment 2007, 49:20-34.
12. Kock B E, Moomaw R W, Susskind L E. Engaging non-governmental organizations in international environmental negotiations: institutional approaches to reforming state-NGO interactions. Papers on International Environmental Negotiation, Volume 15. Ensuring a Sustainable Future 2006, Boston, Harvard Program on Negotiation.
13. Mackay R, Last E. SWITCH city water balance: a scoping model for integrated urban water management. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 2010, 9:291-296.
14. Manful D, Kaule G, van de Giesen N, Schumann A, Pahlow M. Linking hydro-ecological simulation output to decision support. Reducing the Vulnerability of Societies to Water Related Risks at Basin Scale: Proceedings of 3rd IAHS Symposium on Integrated Water Resources Management 2007, 317. Wallingford, IAHS, IAHS Red Book Series.
15. McDonnell R A. Challenges for integrated water resources management: how do we provide the knowledge to support truly integrated thinking?. International Journal of Water Resources Development 2008, 24:131-143.
16. Mostert E. Conflict and co-operation in international freshwater management: a global review. Journal of River Basin Management 2003, 1:1-12.
17. Murphy A H. Hedging and the mode of expression of weather forecasts. Bulletin American Meteorological Society 1978, 59:371-373.
18. 2008, MUSIC, World Wide Web Address: web.mit.edu/dusp/epp/music/about/index.html (accessed 12 December 2008).
19. Oreskes N, Canham C D, Cole J J, Lauenroth W K. The role of quantitative models in science. Models in Ecosystem Science 2003, 13-31. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
20. 2008, Participatory Modelling, World Wide Web Address: www.citg.tudelft.nl/live/pagina.jsp?id=c89d22d0-b5b8-4859-bbb7-b6a7148b82c3&lang=en (accessed 12 December 2008).
21. Pielke Jr R A. Who decides? Forecasts and responsibilities in the 1997 Red River Flood. Applied Behavioral Science Review 1999, 7:83-101.
22. Pielke Jr R A. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics 2007, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
23. Pielke Jr R A, Sarewitz D, Byerly Jr R, Sarewitz D, Pielke Jr R A, Byerly Jr R. Decision making and the future of nature: understanding and using predictions. Prediction: Science, Decision Making and the Future of Nature 2000, 361-387. Washington, DC, Island Press.
24. Truly Useful ... Doing Climate Change Research that is Useful for Both Theory and Practice 2006, Tyndall Centre (ed.), Norwich, Tyndall Centre.
25. van Wonderen J J, Wilson C H, Whiteman M I. 5-Yearly Review of the Environment Agency's groundwater models. Environment Agency of England and Wales Report 223060/01/C 2006, World Wide Web Address: www.environment-agency.gov.uk.
26. Voinov A, Bousquet F. Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling and Software 2010, 25:1268-1281.
27. Voinov A, Gaddis E J B. Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: a perspective from modeling practitioners. Ecological Modelling 2008, 216:197-207.
28. Wallsten T S, Budescu D V, Rapoport A, Zwick R, Forsyth B H. Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986, 115:348-365.
29. Whitehead E, Lawrence A R. The Chalk Aquifer System of Lincolnshire 2006, (RR/06/003). Keyworth, British Geological Survey.
30. Whiteman M I, Seymour K J, Van Wonderen J J, Maginness C H, Hulme P J, Grout M W, Farrell R P, Shepley M G, Whiteman M I, Hulme P J, Grout M W. Start, development and status of the regulator-led national groundwater resources modelling programme in England and Wales. Groundwater Resources Modelling: A Case Study from the UK 2012a, 364:19-37. Geological Society, London, Special Publications.
31. Whiteman M I, Maginness C H, Farrell R P, Gijsbers P J A, Ververs M, Shepley M G, Whiteman M I, Hulme P J, Grout M W. The National Groundwater Modelling System: providing wider access to groundwater models. Groundwater Resources Modelling: A Case Study from the UK 2012b, 364:49-63. Geological Society, London, Special Publications.