Grounded theory on factors involved in the decision-making processes of patients treated with implant therapy

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 270-278

  Narby, Birger ^a   Hallberg, Ulrika ^b   Bagewitz, Ingrid Collin ^c   Söderfeldt, Björn ^d  

^a Public Dental Health Service   (Sweden)

^b NORDIC SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Sweden)

^c Public Dental Service   (Sweden)

^d MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COST; DECISION MAKING; DENTAL ANXIETY; DENTURE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ECONOMICS; FACE PAIN; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TRUST;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DENTAL ANXIETY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTIST-PATIENT RELATIONS; DENTURES; FACIAL PAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; TRUST;

EID: 84863856517     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gagliardi DI, Slade GD, Sanders AE. Impact of dental care on oral health-related quality of life and treatment goals among elderly adults. Aust Dent J 2008; 53: 26-33.
2. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 417-424.
3. Narby B, Kronström M, Söderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Changes in attitudes toward desire for implant treatment: A longitudinal study of a middle-aged and older Swedish population. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 481-485.
4. Müller F, Wahl G, Fuhr K. Age-related satisfaction with complete dentures, desire for improvement and attitudes to implant treatment. Gerodontology 1994; 11: 7-12.
5. Narby B, Kronström M, Söderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Prosthodontics and the patient: What is oral rehabilitation need? Conceptual analysis of need and demand for prosthodontic treatmen. Part 1: A conceptual analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 75-79.
6. Narby B, Kronström M, Söderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Prosthodontics and the patien. Part 2: Need becoming demand, demand becoming utilization. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 183-189.
7. Glantz PO, Nilner K, Jendresen MD, Sundberg H. Quality of fixed prosthodontics after twenty-two years. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 213-218.
8. Ellis JS, Burawi G, Walls A, Thomason JM. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 1293-1298.
9. Trulsson U, Engstrand P, Berggren U, Nannmark U, Brånemark PI. Edentulousness and oral rehabilitation: Experiences from the patients’ perspective. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 417-424.
10. Ellis JS, Levine A, Bedos C, et al. Refusal of implant supported mandibular overdentures by elderly patients. Gerodontology 2011; 28: 62-68.
11. Hyland R, Ellis J, Thomason M, El-Fehy A, Moynihan P. A qualitative study on patients perspectives of how conventional and implant-supported dentures affect eating. J Dent 2009; 37: 718-723.
12. Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Quality Research. Mill Valley, California: Soci ology Press, 1967.
13. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Quality Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage, 1990.
14. Charmaz K. Grounded theory. Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed 2. Thousands Oaks, California: Sage, 2000: 509-535.
15. Mead G.H. On Social Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
16. Glaser B. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press, 1978.
17. Hall WA, Callery P. Enhancing the rigour of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexitivety and relationality. Qual Health Res 2001; 11: 257-272.
18. Zarb G, Albrektsson T, et al (eds). Osseointegration: On Continuing Synergies in Surgery, Prosthodontics, and Bio materials. Chicago: Quintessence, 2009.
19. Malterud K. Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001; 358: 483-488.
20. Abrahamsson KH, Wennström JL, Hallberg U. Patients’ views on periodontal disease; attitudes to oral health and expectancy of periodontal treatment: A qualitative interview study. Oral Health Prev Dent 2008; 3: 209-216.
21. Arnbjerg D, Söderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Factors determing satisfaction with dental care. Community Dent Health 1992; 9: 295-300.
22. Lahti S, Tuutti H, Hausen H, Kääriänen R. Patients’expectations of an ideal dentist and their views concerning the dentist they visited: Do the views conform to the expectations and what determines how well they conform?. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24: 240-244.
23. Sondell K. Verbal communuication in prosthetic dentistry. Input-process-outcome. Swed Dent J Suppl 2001;(146): 1-113.
24. Graham R, Mihaylov S, Jepson N, Allen PF, Bond S. Determing "need" for a removable partial denture: A qualitative study of factors that influence dentist provision and patient use. Brit Dent J 2006; 200: 155-158.
25. Bergendahl B. The relative importance of tooth loss and denture wearing in Swedish adults. Community Dental Health 1989; 6: 103-111.
26. Mericske-Stern R. Prosthetic considerations. Aust Dent J 2008; 53(suppl 1): S49-S59.
27. Hugoson A, Koch G, Göthberg C, et al. Oral health of individuals aged 3-80 years in Jönköping, Sweden during 30 years (1973-2003). II. Review of clinical and radiographic findings. Swed Dent J 2005; 29: 139-155.
28. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020?. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 5-8.