Antibacterial efficacy of silver-impregnated polyelectrolyte multilayers immobilized on a biological dressing in a murine wound infection model

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 256, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 371-377

  Guthrie, Kathleen M ^a   Agarwal, Ankit ^b   Tackes, Dana S ^a   Johnson, Kevin W ^a   Abbott, Nicholas L ^b   Murphy, Christopher J ^a,d,e   Czuprynski, Charles J ^a   Kierski, Patricia R ^a   Schurr, Michael J ^c   McAnulty, Jonathan F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biobrane; biological dressing; chronic wound; infection; murine; polyelectrolyte multilayers; silver nanoparticles

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BIOBRANE; NANOCOATING; POLYELECTROLYTE; SILVER NANOPARTICLE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFICACY; IMMOBILIZATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SILVER IMPREGNATION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND INFECTION;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL DRESSINGS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MICE; OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS; POLYMERS; SILVER; TISSUE ENGINEERING; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84863853088     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256ff99     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:763-771.
2. American Burn Association. American Burn Association Fact Sheet. Chicago IL: American Burn Association; 2011.
3. Ehrenreich M, Ruszczak Z. Update on tissue-engineered biological dressings. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:2407-2424. (Pubitemid 46150659)
4. Greenwood J, Clausen J, Kavanagh S. Experience with biobrane: uses and caveats for success. Eplasty. 2009;9:e25.
5. Whitaker I, Prowse S, Potokar T. A critical evaluation of the use of Biobrane as a biologic skin substitute: a versatile tool for the plastic and reconstructive surgeon. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:333-337.
6. Barret J, Dziewulski P, Ramzy P, et al. Biobrane versus 1% silver sulfadiazine in second-degree pediatric burns. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:62-65. (Pubitemid 30027027)
7. Bishop J. Pediatric considerations in the use of Biobrane in burn wound management. J Burn Care Res. 1995;16:331-333; discussion 333-334.
8. Gerding R, Imbembo A, Fratianne R. Biosynthetic skin substitute vs. 1% silver sulfadiazine for treatment of inpatient partial-thickness thermal burns. J Trauma. 1988;28(8):1265-1269.
9. Nichols K, Moaveni Z, Mcewan C, et al. BA01 Audit of Waikato Regional Burns Centre: biobrane infection rates. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79:A7.
10. Maple PAC, Hamilton-Miller JMT, Brumfitt W. Comparison of the in-vitro activities of the topical antimicrobials azelaic acid, nitrofurazone, silver sulphadiazine and mupirocin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992;29:661-668.
11. Wright JB, Lam K, Hansen D, et al. Efficacy of topical silver against fungal burn wound pathogens. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27:344-350. (Pubitemid 29384063)
12. Furr JR, Russell AD, Turner TD, et al. Antibacterial activity of Actisorb Plus, Actisorb and silver nitrate. J Hosp Infect. 1994;27:201-208. (Pubitemid 24241398)
13. Balogh L, Swanson DR, Tomalia DA, et al. Dendrimer-silver complexes and nanocomposites as antimicrobial agents. Nano Lett. 2001;1:18-21. (Pubitemid 33672965)
14. Ip M, Lui SL, Poon VKM, et al. Antimicrobial activities of silver dressings: an in vitro comparison. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55:59-63. (Pubitemid 43031239)
15. Zachary L, Heggers J, Robson M, et al. The use of topical antimicrobials combined with Biobrane in burn wound infections. J Trauma. 1982;22:833-836. (Pubitemid 13250874)
16. Taylor PL, Ussher AL, Burrell RE. Impact of heat on nanocrystalline silver dressings: part I: chemical and biological properties. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7221-7229. (Pubitemid 41133574)
17. Atiyeh BS, Costagliola M, Hayek SN, et al. Effect of silver on burn wound infection control and healing: Review of the literature. Burns. 2007;33:139-148. (Pubitemid 46188672)
18. Poon VKM, BurdA. In vitro cytotoxity of silver: implication for clinical wound care. Burns. 2004;30:140-147. (Pubitemid 38199863)
19. Agarwal A, Weis TL, Schurr MJ, et al. Surfaces modified with nanometer-thick silver-impregnated polymeric films that kill bacteria but support growth of mammalian cells. Biomaterials. 2010;31:680-690.
20. InnesME, Umraw N, Fish JS, et al. The use of silver coated dressings on donor sitewounds: a prospective, controlledmatched pair study. Burns. 2001;27:621-627. (Pubitemid 32755754)
21. Agarwal A, Guthrie KM, Czuprynski CJ, et al. Polymeric multilayers that contain silver nanoparticles can be stamped onto biological tissues to provide antibacterial activity. Adv Funct Mater. 2011;21:1863-1873.
22. Guthrie KM AA, Tackes DS, Johnson KW, et al. Antibacterial Efficacy of Silver-Impregnated Polyelectrolyte Multilayers Immobilized on Biobrane in a Murine Wound Infection Model. Dallas, TX: The Symposium on Advanced Wound Care and Wound Healing Society; 2011.
23. Podsiadlo P, Paternel S, Rouillard JM, et al. Layer-by-layer assembly of nacre-like nanostructured composites with antimicrobial properties. Langmuir. 2005;21:11915-11921. (Pubitemid 43011536)
24. Sambhy V, MacBride MM, Peterson BR, et al. Silver bromide nanoparticle/polymer composites: dual action tunable antimicrobial materials. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:9798-9808. (Pubitemid 44147964)
25. Yu DG, Lin WC, Yang MC. Surface modification of poly(L-lactic acid) membrane via layer-by-layer assembly of silver nanoparticle-embedded polyelectrolyte multilayer. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007;18:1521-1529.
26. Galiano R, Michaels V. Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2004;12:485-492. (Pubitemid 39007049)
27. Taylor G, Kibsey P, Kirkland T, et al. Predominance of staphylococcal organisms in infections occurring in a burns intensive care unit. Burns. 1992;18:332-335.
28. Adeniran A, Shakespeare P, Patrick S, et al. Influence of a changed care environment on bacterial colonization of burn wounds. Burns. 1995;21:521-525.
29. Lesseva M, Hadjiiski O. Staphylococcal infections in the Sofia Burn centre, Bulgaria. Burns. 1996;22:279-282. (Pubitemid 26164131)
30. Frank DN, Wysocki A, Specht Glick DD, et al. Microbial diversity in chronic open wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:163-172.
31. Giacometti A, Cirioni O, Schimizzi A, et al. Epidemiology and microbiology of surgical wound infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:918-922. (Pubitemid 30082713)
32. Lang E, Eiberg C, BrandisM, et al. Biobrane in the treatment of burn and scald injuries in children. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:485-489. (Pubitemid 41552082)
33. Fonder MA, Lazarus GS, Cowan DA, et al. Treating the chronic wound: A practical approach to the care of nonhealing wounds and wound care dressings. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:185-206.
34. Arnold M, Barbul A. Nutrition and wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:42S-58S. (Pubitemid 44317771)
35. O'Meara S,Nelson E,Golder S, et al. Systematic reviewof methods to diagnose infection in foot ulcers in diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23:341-347.
36. Robson M, Mannari R, Smith P, et al.Maintenance of wound bacterial balance. Am J Surg. 1999;178:399-402. (Pubitemid 30001521)
37. Lal S, Barrow R, Wolf S, et al. Biobrane (R) improves wound healing in burned children without increased risk of infection. Shock. 2000; 14:314-318; discussion 318-319.
38. Gonce S, Miskell P, Waymack J. A comparison of Biobrane vs. homograft for coverage of contaminated burn wounds. Burns Incl Therm Inj. 1988;14:409-412. (Pubitemid 18265941)
39. Greenhalgh D. Models of wound healing. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005;26(4):293-305. (Pubitemid 41074513)