Improving access to maternity services: An overview of cash transfer and voucher schemes in South Asia

Reproductive Health Matters

Volumn 20, Issue 39, 2012, Pages 142-154

  Jehan, Kate ^a   Sidney, Kristi ^b   Smith, Helen ^a   de Costa, Ayesha ^c  

^a LIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c RD Gardi Medical College   (India)

Author keywords

Cash transfer; Demand side financing; Health care financing; Maternal health care; South Asia; Voucher

Indexed keywords

AAMA PROGRAMME; ARTICLE; CASH TRANSFER ELEMENT; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FUNDING; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MATERNAL CARE; MATERNAL HEALTH VOUCHER SCHEME; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFE MOTHERHOOD SCHEME; SCHEME FOR LONG LIFE; SEHAT VOUCHER SCHEME; SOUTH ASIA;

ASIA, WESTERN; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MEDICAL ASSISTANCE; PREGNANCY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84863848982     PISSN: 09688080     EISSN: 14609576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39609-2     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Schmidt J, Ensor T, Hossain A, et al. Vouchers as demand side financing instruments for health care: a review of the Bangladesh maternal voucher scheme. Health Policy 2010, 96:98-107.
2. Agha S Impact of a maternal health voucher scheme on institutional delivery among low income women in Pakistan. Reproductive Health 2011, 8:10.
3. Ensor T, Clapham S, Prasai DP What drives health policy formulation: insights from the Nepal maternity incentive scheme?. Health Policy 2009, 90:247-253.
4. Anwar I, Sami M, Akhtar N, et al. Inequity in maternal health-care services: evidence from homebased skilled-birth-attendant programmes in Bangladesh. Bulletin of World Health Organization 2008, 86(4):252-259.
5. Kesterton A, Cleland J, Sloggett A, et al. Institutional delivery in rural India: the relative importance of accessibility and economic status. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2010, 10(30):1-9.
6. Pathak PK, Singh A, Subramanian SV Economic inequalities in maternal health care: prenatal care and skilled birth attendance in India, 1992-2006. PLoS One 2010, 5(10):1-17.
7. Lagarde M, Haines A, Palmer N The impact of conditional cash transfers on health outcomes and use of health services in low and middle income countries (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4 At:, Accessed 15 October 2011. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008137/pdf.
8. Ahmed S, Khan M Is demand-side financing equity enhancing? Lessons from a maternal health voucher scheme in Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine 2011, 72(10):1704-1710.
9. Anderson I, Axelson H, Tan B-K The other crisis: the economics and financing of maternal, newborn and child health in Asia. Health Policy and Planning 2011, 26:288-297.
10. Global Health Observatory Data Repository 2011 World Health Organization, At:, Accessed 28 October 2011. http://apps.who.int/ghodata/.
11. Hussein J, Bell J, Dar lang M, et al. An appraisal of the maternal mortality decline in Nepal. PLoS ONE 6(5): e19898. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0019898.
12. Powell-Jackson T, Morrison J, Tiwari S, et al. The experiences of districts in implementing a national incentive programme to promote safe delivery in Nepal. BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:97.
13. Witter S, Khadka S, Nath H, et al. The national free delivery policy in Nepal: early evidence of its effects on health facilities. Health Policy and Planning 2011, 26:ii84-ii91.
14. Lim S, Dandona L, Hoisington J, et al. India's Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet 2010, 375:2009-2023.
15. Chatterjee P India's government aims to improve rural health. Lancet 2006, 28;368(9546):1483-1484.
16. Bhate-Deosthali P, Khatri R, Wagle S Poor standards of care in small, private hospitals in Maharashtra, India: implications for public-private partnerships for maternity care. Reproductive Health Matters 2011, 19(37):32-41.
17. International Institute for Population Sciences: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-1), 1992-93: India 1995, IIPS, Mumbai, At:, Accessed 25 January 2012. http://www.nfhsindia.org/.
18. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-6: India 2007, International Institute for Population Sciences, IIPS, Mumbai, At:, Accessed 25 January 2012. http://www.nfhsindia.org/.
19. Hogan M, Foreman K, Naghavi M, et al. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980-2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet 2010, 375(9726):1609-1623.
20. National Institute of Population Studies Pakistan, and Macro International. Demographic & Health Survey 2006-07. Islamabad: NIPS and Macro International. At: Accessed 27 January 2012. http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FR200/FR200.pdf.
21. National Institute of Population Studies, Pakistan and IRD/Macro International Inc. Demographic & Health Survey 1990-1991. Islamabad: NIPS and IRD/Macro International. At: Accessed 27 January 2012. http://measuredhs.com/publications/publication-fr29-dhs-final-reports.cfm.
22. United Nations Statistics Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs, At:, Accessed 26 January 2012. http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Data.aspx.
23. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2008 World Health Organization, At:, Accessed 4 February 2012. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/9789241500265/en/index.html.
24. McNamee P, Ternant L, Hussein J Barriers in accessing maternal health care: evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 2009, 9(1):41-48.
25. Ensor T, Cooper S Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy and Planning 2004, 19(2):69-79.
26. Thaddeus S, Maine D Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Social Science and Medicine 1994, 38(8):1091-1110.
27. Borghi J, Ensor T, Neupane BD, et al. Financial implications of skilled attendance at delivery in Nepal. Tropical Medicine & International Health 2006, 11(2):228-237.
28. Rob U, Rahman M, Bellows B Evaluation of the impact of the voucher and accreditation approach on improving reproductive behaviours and RH status: Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 2010, 11:257.
29. Ahmed S, Khan M A maternal health voucher scheme: what have we learned from the demand-side financing scheme in Bangladesh?. Health Policy and Planning 2011, 26:25-32.
30. Paul VK India: conditional cash transfers for in-facility deliveries. Lancet 2010, 375(9730):1943-1944.
31. Lawn JE, Kerber K, Enweronu-Larya C, et al. Newborn survival in low resource settings - are we delivering?. BJOG 2009, 116(Suppl. 1):49-59.
32. George A Persistence of high maternal mortality in Koppal District, Karnataka, India: observed service delivery constraints. Reproductive Health Matters 2007, 15(30):91-102.
33. Rath A, Basnett I, Cole C, et al. Improving emergency obstetric care in a context of very high maternal mortality: the Nepal Safer Motherhood Project 1997-2004. Reproductive Health Matters 2007, 15(30):72-80.
34. Barker C, Bird C, Pradhan A Support to the Safe Motherhood Programme in Nepal: an integrated approach. Reproductive Health Matters 2007, 15(30):81-90.
35. Bhusal C, Singh S, BC R, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of Aama Surakshya Karyakram in terms of barriers in accessing maternal health services in Nepal. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council 2011, 9(19):129-137.
36. Powell-Jackson T, Neupane BD, Tiwari S, et al. Evaluation of the Safe Delivery Incentive Programme: Final Report of the Evaluation. 2008 At:, Accessed 29 October 2011. http://www.safemotherhood.org.np/pdf/106Final_SDIP_Evaluation_Report.pdf.
37. Powell-Jackson T, Neupane BD, Tiwari S, et al. The impact of Nepal's national incentive programme to promote safe delivery in the district of Makwanpur. Innovations in Health System Finance in Developing and Transitional Economies (Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research) 2009, 21:221-249.
38. Support to Safe Motherhood Programme, Nepal: Bi-annual Report Government of Nepal, At:, Accessed 12 February 2012. http://www.safemotherhood.org.np/pdf/149Biannual%20report%20final%205%20March%2009.pdf.
39. Subha Sri B, Sarojini N, Khanna R An investigation of maternal deaths following public protests in a tribal district of Madhya Pradesh, central India. Reproductive Health Matters 2012, 20(39):11-20.
40. Concurrent assessment of Janani Suraksha Yojana scheme in selected states of India: Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh 2009, 1-59. UN Population Fund India, UNFPA India, New Delhi.
41. Janani Suraksha Yojana: features and frequently asked questions and answers. 2006 Government of India, At:, Accessed 11 October 2011. http://jknrhm.com/PDF/JSR.pdf.
42. Mavalankar D, Singh A, Patel SR, et al. Saving mothers and newborns through an innovative partnership with private sector obstetricians: Chiranjeevi scheme of Gujarat, India. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2009, 107(3):271-276.
43. Bhat R, Mavalankar D, Singh PV, et al. Maternal healthcare financing: Gujarat's Chiranjeevi Scheme and its beneficiaries. Journal of Health, Population & Nutrition 2009, 27(2):249-258.
44. Chiranjeevi Yojana: Operational Mechanisms of the Scheme. 2012 Government of Gujarat, At:, Accessed 10 February 2012. http://www.gujhealth.gov.in/operational-scheme.htm.
45. Singh A, Mavalankar D, Bhat R, et al. Providing skilled birth attendants and emergency obstetric care to the poor through partnership with private sector obstetricians in Gujarat, India. Bulletin of World Health Organization 2009, 87(12):960-964.
46. Vora K, Mavalankar D, Ramani K, et al. Maternal health situation in India: a case study. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 2009, 27(2):184-201.
47. Acharya A, McNamee P Assessing Gujarat's 'Chiranjeevi' Scheme. Economic & Political Weekly 2009, 44(48):13-15.
48. Nguyen H, et al. Encouraging maternal health service utilization: an evaluation of the Bangladesh voucher program. Social Science & Medicine 2012, 74:989-996.
49. Koehlmoos TLP, Ashraf A, Kabir H, et al. Rapid assessment of demand-side financing in Bangladesh, ICDDR,B Working Paper 170 2008, Dhaka.
50. Hamid B, Kazmi S, Eichler R, et al. Pay for Performance: Improving Maternal Health Services in Pakistan September 2009, Health Systems 20/20 project, Abt Associates Inc., Bethesda, MD.
51. Bellows N, Bellows B, Warren C The use of vouchers for reproductive health services in developing countries: systematic review. Journal of Tropical Medicine and International Health 2011, 16(1):84-96.
52. Austveg B Perpetuating power: some reasons why reproductive health has stalled. Reproductive Health Matters 2011, 19(38):26-34.