Talker-specific perceptual adaptation during online speech perception

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 27, Issue 7-8, 2012, Pages 979-1001

  Trude, Alison M ^a   Brown Schmidt, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Accent; Eye tracking; Perceptual learning; Talker specific

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOWEL;

EID: 84863847351     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.597153     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S. and Tanenhaus, M. K. 1998. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38: 419-439.
2. Brainard, D. H. 1997. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10: 433-436.
3. Brennan, S. E. and Hanna, J. E. 2009. Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1: 274-291.
4. Brown-Schmidt, S. 2009. Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog. Journal of Memory and Language, 61: 171-190.
5. Brown-Schmidt, S. and Tanenhaus, M. K. 2008. Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science, 32: 643-684.
6. Creel, S. C., Aslin, R. N. and Tanenhaus, M. K. 2008. Heeding the voice of experience: The role of talker variation in lexical access. Cognition, 106: 633-664.
7. Dahan, D. 2010. The time course of interpretation in speech comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19: 121-126.
8. Dahan, D., Drucker, S. J. and Scarborough, R. A. 2008. Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations?. Cognition, 108: 710-718.
9. Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K. and Hogan, E. M. 2001. Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16: 507-534.
10. Dahan, D. and Tanenhaus, M. K. 2004. Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30: 498-513.
11. Evans, B. G. and Iverson, P. 2003. Vowel normalization for accent: An investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115: 352-361.
12. Goldinger, S. D. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105: 251-279.
13. Gordon, P. C. 1988. Induction of rate-dependent processing by coarse-grained aspects of speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 43: 137-146.
14. Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K. and Trueswell, J. C. 2003. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49: 43-61.
15. Johnson, K. 1990. The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88: 642-654.
16. Johnson, K., Strand, E. A. and D'Imperio, M. 1999. Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 27: 359-384.
17. Keysar, B., Lin, S. and Barr, D. J. 2003. Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89: 25-41.
18. Kraljic, T. and Samuel, A. G. 2006. Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13: 262-268.
19. Kraljic, T. and Samuel, A. G. 2007. Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 56: 1-15.
20. Ladefoged, P. and Broadbent, D. E. 1957. Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society, 29: 98-104.
21. Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P. and Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1967. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74: 431-461.
23. Magnuson, J. S. and Nusbaum, H. C. 2007. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33: 391-409.
24. Martin, C. S., Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B. and Summers, W. V. 1989. Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory, and Cognition, 15: 676-684.
25. McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264: 746-748.
26. McMurray, B., Aslin, R., Tanenhaus, M., Spivey, M. and Subik, D. 2008. Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in speech: Implications for categorical perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34: 1609-1631.
27. Metzing, C. and Brennan, S. E. 2003. When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49: 201-213.
28. Mitterer, H. and McQueen, J. M. 2009. Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35: 244-263.
29. Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B. and Martin, C. S. 1989. Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85: 365-378.
30. Nearey, T. M. 1989. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85: 2088-2113.
31. Newman, R. S. and Sawusch, J. R. 2009. Perceptual normalization for speaking rate III: Effects of the rate of one voice on perception of another. Journal of Phonetics, 37: 46-65.
32. Nusbaum, H. C. and Morin, T. M. 1992. "Paying attention to differences among talkers". In Speech perception, speech production, and linguistic structure, Edited by: Tohkura, Y., Sagisaka, Y. and Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. 113-134. Tokyo: OHM.
33. Peterson, G. E. and Barney, H. L. 1952. Control methods used in a study of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24: 175-184.
34. Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D. and McQueen, J. M. 2003. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90: 51-89.
35. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M. and Sedivy, J. C. 1995. Integration of visual and lingustic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268: 1632-1634.
36. Trueswell, J. C. and Tanenhaus, M. K. 1994. "Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution". In Perspectives on sentence processing, Edited by: Clifton, C., Frazier, L. and Rayner, K. 155-179. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.