Asymptotic entanglement in 1D quantum walks with a time-dependent coined

International Journal of Modern Physics B

Volumn 26, Issue 20, 2012, Pages

  Salimi, S ^a   Yosefjani, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KURDISTAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

entanglement; Quantum walk; time dependent coined

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863840337     PISSN: 02179792     EISSN: 17936578     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0217979212501123     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. S. P. Meyn and R. L. Tweedie, Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability, 1st edn., (Cambridge University Press, UK, 2005).
2. Y. Aharonov, L. Davidovich and N. Zagury, Phys. Rev. A 48, 1687 (1993).
3. A. Ambainis et al., One dimensional quantum walk, in Proc. 33rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Heraklion, Greece (ACM Press, New York, 2001), pp. 37-49.
4. A. Nayak and A. Vishwanath, DIMACS Technical Report, (No. 2000), 2001.
5. E. Farhi and S. Gutmann, Phys. Rev. A 58, 915 (1998).
6. J. Watrous, J. of Comput. Syst. Sci. 62, 376 (2001).
7. A. Ambainis, J. Kempe and A. Rivosh, Coins make quantum walks faster, in Proc. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), (MC Press, New York, 2005), p. 1099.
8. A. M. Childs, Communi. Math. Phys. 294, 581 (2010).
9. A. M. Childs and J. Goldstone, Phys. Rev. A 70, 022314 (2004).
10. A. Ambainis, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 1 507 (2003).
11. F. Magniez, M. Santha and M. Szegedy, Quantum algorithms for the triangle problem, in Proc. 16th ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, (2005), p. 1109.
12. F. Magniez et al., Search via quantum walk, in Proc. 39th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, (2007), p. 575.
13. A. Ambainis, SIAM J. Comput. 37, 210 (2007).
14. A. M. Childs et al., Exponential algorithms speedup by quantum walk, in Proc. 35th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, (ACM Press, New York, 2003), p. 59.
15. C. M. Chandrashekar and R. Laflamme, Phys. Rev. A 78, 022314 (2008).
16. M. Mohseni et al., J. Chem. Phys. 129, 174106 (2008).
17. R. D. Somma et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 130504 (2008).
18. T. Oka et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 100602 (2005).
19. W. Dur et al., Phys. Rev. A 66, 052319 (2002).
20. B. C. Travaglione and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032310 (2002).
21. J. M. Grossman et al., The 35th Meeting of the Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, DAMOP04 (Tuscon, AZ, 2004).
22. J. Du et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 042316 (2003).
23. C. A. Ryan et al., Phys. Rev. A 72, 062317 (2005).
24. C. M. Chandrashekar, Phys. Rev. A 74, 032307 (2006).
25. R. Horodecki et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865942 (2009).
26. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
27. C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992).
28. A. Barenco et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4083 (1983).
29. A. K. Ekert Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
30. V. Kendon and O. Maloyer, Theor. Comput. Sci. 394, 187 (2008).
31. A Ambainis et al., Quantum walk on graph, in Proc. 33rd Annual ACM STOC, Heraklion, Greece (ACM, NewYork, 2001), pp. 50-59.
32. A. Nayak, and A. Vishwanath, quant-ph/0010117 (2000).
33. O. Maloyer and V. Kendon, New J. Phys. 9, 87 (2007).
34. N. C. Lambert and T. Brandes, Phys. Rev. Lett 92, 073602 (2004).
35. V. Vedral, New. J. Phys. 6, 102 (2004).
36. W. Dur et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 097203 (2005).
37. W. Zurek, Phys. Today 44, 36 (1991).
38. S. Anders et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 107206 (2006).
39. F. Verstraete, D. Porras and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 227205 (2004)
40. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003).
41. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004).
42. J. Kempe, Contemp. Phys. 44, 307327 (2003).
43. I. Carneiro et al., New J. Phys. 7, 156 (2005).
44. I. Carneiro et al., New J. Phys. 7, 156 (2005).
45. S. E. Venegas-Andraca, S. Bose, preprint, arXiv: 0901.3946, (2009).
46. G. Abal et al., Phys. Rev. A 73, 042302 (2006).
47. M. Annabestani, M. R. Abolhasani and G. Abal, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43, 075301 (2010).
48. S. K. Goyal and C. M. Chandrashekar, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43, 235303 (2010).
49. N. Konno, Quantum Inf. Proc. 8, 387 (2009).
50. M. Santha, in 5th Theory and Applications of Models of Computation (TAMC08), Xian, April 2008 LNCS 4978 (2000), p. 31.
51. N. Linden, J. Sharam, Phys. Rev. A 80, 052327 (2009).
52. T. Machida et al., (eds.), IWNC 2009, Limit theorem for a time-dependent coined quantum walk on the line, in Proc. Information and Communications Technology, Vol. 2, (Himeji, Japan, 2010), p. 226.
53. M. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, (Cambridge University Press, UK, 2000).
54. G. Abal, R. Siri, A. Romanelli and R. Donangelo, Phys. Rev. A 73, 042302 (2006).
55. N. Inui et al., Phys. Rev. E 72, 056112 (2005).
56. A. Boggess and F. J. Narcowich, A First Course in Wavelets with Fourier Analysis (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., US, 2009).
57. Y. Shikano and H. Katsura, Phys. Rev. E 82, 031122 (2010).
58. Y. Shikano and H. Katsura, AIP Conf. Proc. 1363, 151 (2011).
59. S. Aubry and G. Andre, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc. 3, 133 (1980).