Evaluating socio-economic equity of REDD+ in a rights-based approach: Rapid equity appraisal matrix

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 22, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-12

  Jaung, Wanggi ^a   Bae, Jae Soo ^a,b  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

^b Korea Forest Research Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Co benefits; Equity; Indonesia; Rapid equity appraisal matrix; REDD+

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION INDICATOR; ARTICLE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; INDONESIA; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAPID EQUITY APPRAISAL MATRIX; SOCIOECONOMICS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 84863836915     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson P. Free, Prior, and Informed Consent in REDD+: Principles and Approaches for Policy and Project Development 2011, RECOFTC and GIZ, Bangkok.
2. Angelsen A. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009, CIFOR, Bogor.
3. Angelsen A., Wertz-Kanounnikoff S. What are the key design issues for REDD and the criteria for assessing options?. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications 2008, 11-22. CIFOR, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
4. Bardach E. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving 2005, CQ Press, Washington, DC. 2nd ed.
5. Börner J., Wunder S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff S., Tito M.R., Pereira L., Nascimento N. Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: scope and equity implications. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1272-1282.
6. Briner R.B., Rousseau D.M. Evidence-based I-O psychology: not there yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011, 4:3-22.
7. Brown D., Seymour F., Peskett L. How do we achieve REDD co-benefits and avoid doing harm?. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications 2008, 107-118. CIFOR, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
8. Cattaneo A., Lubowski R., Busch J., Creed A., Strassburg B., Boltz F., et al. On international equity in reducing emissions from deforestation. Environmental Science & Policy 2010, 13:742-753.
9. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) REDD+ Project Sites in Indonesia 2010, Retrieved from: http://www.forestsclimatechange.org/redd+project-sites-in-indonesia.html.
10. Cerbu G.A., Swallow B.M., Thompson D.Y. Locating REDD: a global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science & Policy 2011, 14:168-180.
11. Colfer C.J. The Complex Forest: Communities, Uncertainty, and Adaptive Collaborative Management 2005, RFF and CIFOR, Washington, DC, and Bogor.
12. Colfer C.J. The Equitable Forest: Diversity, Community, and Resource Management 2005, RFF and CIFOR, Washington, DC, and Bogor.
13. Dooley K., Griffiths T., Leake H., Ozinga S. Cutting Corners: World Bank's Forest and Carbon Fund Fails Forests and Peoples 2008, FERN and Forest Peoples Programme, Brussels and Moreton-in-Marsh.
14. Dooley K., Griffiths T., Martone F., Ozinga S. Smoke and Mirrors: A Critical Assessment of the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility 2011, FERN and Forest Peoples Programme, Brussels and Moreton-in-Marsh.
15. Grainger A., Boucher D.H., Frumhoff P.C., Laurance W.F., Lovejoy T., McNeely J., et al. Biodiversity and REDD at Copenhagen. Current Biology 2009, 19(21):1-3.
16. Griffiths T. Seeing " REDD" ? Forests, Climate Change Mitigation and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities 2009, Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-March.
17. Herold M., Skutsch M.M. Measurement, reporting and verification for REDD+: objectives, capacities and institutions. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009, 85-100. CIFOR, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
18. Karsenty A., Ongolo S. Can " fragile states" decide to reduce their deforestation? The inappropriate use of the theory of incentives with respect to the REDD mechanism. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.05.006.
19. Kuhfeld W.F. Conjoint Analysis 2010, SAS Institute, Inc, North Carolina.
20. Larson A.M. Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: lessons for REDD+. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21:540-549.
21. Lawlor K., Huberman D. Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) and human rights. Rights-based Approaches: Exploring Issues and Opportunities for Conservation 2009, 269-285. CIFOR, Bogor. J. Campese, T.C.H. Sunderland, T. Greiber, G. Oviedo (Eds.).
22. Madeira E.M., Sills E., Brockhaus M., Verchot L., Kanninen M. What is a REDD+ Pilot? A Preliminary Typology based on Early Actions in Indonesia 2010, CIFOR, Bogor.
23. Merger E., Dutschke M., Verchot L. Options for REDD+ voluntary certification to ensure net GHG benefits, poverty alleviation, sustainable management of forests and biodiversity conservation. Forests 2011, 2:550-577.
24. Ministry of Forestry (MoF) A Guide to the Concession Licensing and Management of Ecosystem Restoration 2008, MoF, Jakarta.
25. Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), 2010. Real-Time Evaluation of Norway's International Climate and Forest Initiative: Contributions to National REDD+ Processes 2007-2010. Country Report: Indonesia. Norad, Oslo.
26. Okereke C., Dooley K. Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation: towards a post-Kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20:82-95.
27. Orme B. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research 2010, Research Publishers LLC, Madison. 2nd ed.
28. Prabhu R., Colfer C.J.P., Dudley R.G. Guidelines for Developing, Testing and Selecting Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: A C&I Developer's Reference 1999, CIFOR, Bogor.
29. Richards M., Panfil S., Hayward J., Calderwood N. Pro-Poor REDD - How will we Know? Social Impact Assessment of Land-based Carbon Activities 2010, The Katoomba Group, Washington, DC.
30. Richards M., Panfil S.N. Towards cost-effective social impact assessment of REDD+ projects: meeting the challenge of multiple benefit standards. International Forestry Review 2011, 12:1-12.
31. Sunderlin W.D., Hatcher J., Liddle M. From Exclusion to Ownership? Challenges and Opportunities in Advancing Forest Tenure Reform 2008, Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, DC.
32. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2010. Decision 1/CP.16, The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action Under the Convention (FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1) Retrieved from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf%23page=2.
33. van Noordwijk M., Purnomo H., Peskett L., Setiono B. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) in Indonesia: options and challenges for fair and efficient payment distribution mechanisms 2008, World Agroforestry Centre, Bogor, (No. 81).
34. Wollenberg E., Springate-Baginski O. Incentives +: How Can REDD Improve Well-Being in Forest Communities? 2009, CIFOR, Bogor, (No. 21).