Nuclear actin depolymerisation in transcriptionally active avian and amphibian oocytes leads to collapse of intranuclear structures

Nucleus (United States)

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Maslova, Antonina ^a   Krasikova, Alla ^a  

^a ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Cell nucleus; Cytochalasin; Genome architecture; Germinal vesicle; Karyosphere; Lampbrush chromosomes; Latrunculin; Nuclear actin; Nuclear bodies; Oogenesis; Transcription

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; CYTOCHALASIN D; LATRUNCULIN A; PHALLOIDIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL STRUCTURE; CHICKEN; CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPOLYMERIZATION; FEMALE; INTRANUCLEAR SPACE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; QUAIL; XENOPUS;

AMPHIBIA; AVES; PHASIANIDAE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84863822101     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Jockusch BM, Schoenenberger CA, Stetefeld J, Aebi U. Tracking down the different forms of nuclear actin. Trends Cell Biol 2006; 16:391-6; PMID:16828286; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2006.06.006.
2. Hofmann WA, de Lanerolle P. Nuclear actin: to polymerize or not to polymerize. J Cell Biol 2006; 172:495-6; PMID:16476772; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200601095.
3. Gieni RS, Hendzel MJ. Actin dynamics and functions in the interphase nucleus: moving toward an understanding of nuclear polymeric actin. Biochem Cell Biol 2009; 87:283-306; PMID:19234542; http://dx.doi. org/10.1139/O08-133.
4. Percipalle P. Genetic connections of the actin cytoskeleton and beyond. Bioessays 2007; 29:407-11; PMID:17450545; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20570.
5. Visa N, Percipalle P. Nuclear functions of actin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2:620; PMID:20452941; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect. a000620.
6. Scheer U, Hinssen H, Franke WW, Jockusch BM. Microinjection of actin-binding proteins and actin antibodies demonstrates involvement of nuclear actin in transcription of lampbrush chromosomes. Cell 1984; 39:111-22; PMID:6386181; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0092-8674(84)90196-X.
7. Percipalle P, Visa N. Molecular functions of nuclear actin in transcription. J Cell Biol 2006; 172:967-71; PMID:16549500; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200512083.
8. Grummt I. Actin and myosin as transcription factors. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2006; 16:191-6; PMID:16495046; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gde.2006.02.001.
9. Farrants AK. Chromatin remodelling and actin organisation. FEBS Lett 2008; 582:2041-50; PMID:18442483; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.032.
10. Hofmann W, Reichart B, Ewald A, Müller E, Schmitt I, Stauber RH, et al. Cofactor requirements for nuclear export of Rev response element (RRE)-and constitutive transport element (CTE)-containing retroviral RNAs. An unexpected role for actin. J Cell Biol 2001; 152:895-910; PMID:11238447; http://dx.doi. org/10.1083/jcb.152.5.895.
11. Percipalle P, Raju CS, Fukuda N. Actin-associated hnRNP proteins as transacting factors in the control of mRNA transport and localization. RNA Biol 2009; 6:171-4; PMID:19276667; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.6.2.8195.
12. Dundr M, Ospina JK, Sung MH, John S, Upender M, Ried T, et al. Actin-dependent intranuclear repositioning of an active gene locus in vivo. J Cell Biol 2007; 179:1095-103; PMID:18070915; http://dx.doi. org/10.1083/jcb.200710058.
13. Chuang CH, Carpenter AE, Fuchsova B, Johnson T, de Lanerolle P, Belmont AS. Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr Biol 2006; 16:825-31; PMID:16631592; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.059.
14. Kumaran RI, Thakar R, Spector DL. Chromatin dynamics and gene positioning. Cell 2008; 132:929-34; PMID:18358806; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2008.03.004.
15. Clark TG, Merriam RW. Diffusible and bound actin in nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Cell 1977; 12:883-91; PMID:563771; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(77)90152-0.
16. Gounon P, Karsenti E. Involvement of contractile proteins in the changes in consistency of oocyte nucleoplasm of the newt Pleurodeles waltlii. J Cell Biol 1981; 88:410-21; PMID:6894149; http://dx.doi. org/10.1083/jcb.88.2.410.
17. Gard DL. Confocal microscopy and 3-D reconstruction of the cytoskeleton of Xenopus oocytes. Microsc Res Tech 1999; 44:388-414; PMID:10211674; h t t p://d x. d o i. o r g/1 0. 1 0 0 2/(S I C I) 1 0 9 7-0029(19990315)44:6<388::AID-JEMT2>3.0. CO;2-L.
18. Stüven T, Hartmann E, Görlich D. Exportin 6: a novel nuclear export receptor that is specific for profilin-actin complexes. EMBO J 2003; 22:5928-40; PMID:14592989; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg565.
19. Bohnsack MT, Stüven T, Kuhn C, Cordes VC, Görlich D. A selective block of nuclear actin export stabilizes the giant nuclei of Xenopus oocytes. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:257-63; PMID:16489345; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/ncb1357.
20. Parfenov VN, Davis DS, Pochukalina GN, Sample CE, Bugaeva EA, Murti KG. Nuclear actin filaments and their topological changes in frog oocytes. Exp Cell Res 1995; 217:385-94; PMID:7698240; http://dx.doi. org/10.1006/excr.1995.1101.
21. Gruzova MN, Parfenov VN. Karyosphere in oogenesis and intranuclear morphogenesis. Int Rev Cytol 1993; 144:1-52; PMID:7686538; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61512-0.
22. Batalova FM, Bogoliubov DS, Parfenov VN. Karyosphere and extrachromosomal nuclear bodies in oocytes of the scorpionfly, Panorpa communis. Tsitologiia 2005; 47:847-59; PMID:16711383.
23. Gruzova MN, Tsvetkov AG, Pochukalina GN, Parfenov VN. The formation of the karyosphere in the oogenesis of insects and amphibians. Tsitologiia 1995; 37:744-69; PMID:8669127.
24. Bogolyubov D, Parfenov V. Immunogold localization of RNA polymerase II and pre-mRNA splicing factors in Tenebrio molitor oocyte nuclei with special emphasis on karyosphere development. Tissue Cell 2001; 33:549-61; PMID:11827099; http://dx.doi. org/10.1054/tice.2001.0210.
25. Rübsam R, Büning J. F-actin is a component of the karyosome in neuropteran oocyte nuclei. Arthropod Struct Dev 2001; 30:125-33; PMID:18088950; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1467-8039(01)00026-3.
26. Callan HG. Lampbrush Chromosomes. Molecular biology Biochemistry and Biophysics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 1986; 1-252.
27. Morgan GT. Lampbrush chromosomes and associated bodies: new insights into principles of nuclear structure and function. Chromosome Res 2002; 10:177-200; PMID:12067208; http://dx.doi. org/10.1023/A:1015227020652.
28. Gaginskaya E, Kulikova T, Krasikova A. Avian lampbrush chromosomes: a powerful tool for exploration of genome expression. Cytogenet Genome Res 2009; 124:251-67; PMID:19556778; http://dx.doi. org/10.1159/000218130.
29. Maslova AV, Krasikova AV. Spatial arrangement of macro-, midi-and microchromosomes in transcriptionally active nuclei of growing oocytes in birds of the order galliformes. Tsitologiia 2011; 53:116-28; PMID:21516818.
30. Krasikova AV, Vasilevskaya EV, Khodyuchenko TA, Maslova AV. Three dimensional organization of avian oocyte nucleus 2012; In Press.
31. Mais C, McStay B, Scheer U. On the formation of amplified nucleoli during early Xenopus oogenesis. J Struct Biol 2002; 140:214-26; PMID:12490169; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8477(02)00526-9.
32. Greenfield ML. The oocyte of the domestic chicken shortly after hatching, studied by electron microscopy. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1966; 15:297-316; PMID:6007184.
33. Ch'in Suang Hao, Gaginskaia ER, Kalinina EI. Characteristics of oogenesis in the chick. I. The extrafollicular period in the development of the oocytes. Ontogenez 1979; 10:340-9; PMID:481849.
34. Hutchison N. Lampbrush chromosomes of the chicken, Gallus domesticus. J Cell Biol 1987; 105:1493-500; PMID:3667689; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.105.4.1493.
35. Wulf E, Deboben A, Bautz FA, Faulstich H, Wieland T. Fluorescent phallotoxin, a tool for the visualization of cellular actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1979; 76:4498-502; PMID:291981; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.9.4498.
36. Gonsior SM, Platz S, Buchmeier S, Scheer U, Jockusch BM, Hinssen H. Conformational difference between nuclear and cytoplasmic actin as detected by a monoclonal antibody. J Cell Sci 1999; 112:797-809; PMID:10036230.
37. Cooper JA. Effects of cytochalasin and phalloidin on actin. J Cell Biol 1987; 105:1473-8; PMID:3312229; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.105.4.1473.
38. Miyamoto K, Gurdon JB. Nuclear actin and transcriptional activation. Commun Integr Biol 2011; 4:582-3; PMID:22046469.
39. Kiseleva E, Drummond SP, Goldberg MW, Rutherford SA, Allen TD, Wilson KL. Actin-and protein-4.1-containing filaments link nuclear pore complexes to subnuclear organelles in Xenopus oocyte nuclei. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:2481-90; PMID:15128868; http://dx.doi. org/10.1242/jcs.01098.
40. Miyamoto K, Pasque V, Jullien J, Gurdon JB. Nuclear actin polymerization is required for transcriptional reprogramming of Oct4 by oocytes. Genes Dev 2011; 25:946-58; PMID:21536734; http://dx.doi. org/10.1101/gad.615211.
41. Clark TG, Rosenbaum JL. An actin filament matrix in hand-isolated nuclei of X. laevis oocytes. Cell 1979; 18:1101-8; PMID:574804; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0092-8674(79)90223-X.
42. Gall JG. Exporting actin. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:205-7; PMID:16508670; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb0306-205.
43. Paine PL, Johnson ME, Lau YT, Tluczek LJ, Miller DS. The oocyte nucleus isolated in oil retains in vivo structure and functions. Biotechniques 1992; 13:238-46; PMID:1382465.
44. Flanagan MD, Lin S. Cytochalasins block actin filament elongation by binding to high affinity sites associated with F-actin. J Biol Chem 1980; 255:835-8; PMID:7356663.
45. Morton WM, Ayscough KR, McLaughlin PJ. Latrunculin alters the actin-monomer subunit interface to prevent polymerization. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2:376-8; PMID:10854330; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/35014075.
46. Morozova KN, Kiseleva EV. Changes in Xenopus oocyte nuclear and cytoplasmic organization after actin filaments depolymerization by latrunculin. Tsitologiia 2008; 50:394-405; PMID:18683585.
47. Cullen CF, Brittle AL, Ito T, Ohkura H. The conserved kinase NHK-1 is essential for mitotic progression and unifying acentrosomal meiotic spindles in Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol 2005; 171:593-602; PMID:16301329; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200508127.
48. Mori M, Monnier N, Daigle N, Bathe M, Ellenberg J, Lénárt P. Intracellular transport by an anchored homogeneously contracting F-actin meshwork. Curr Biol 2011; 21:606-11; PMID:21439825; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.002.
49. Garber JC, Wayne Barbee R, Bielitzki JT, Clayton LA, Donovan JC, Hendriksen CFM, et al. Guide for Care and Use of the Laboratory Animals. The National Academic Press, Washington DC 8:220.
50. Wallace RA, Jared DW, Dumont JN, Sega MW. Protein incorporation by isolated amphibian oocytes. 3. Optimum incubation conditions. J Exp Zool 1973; 184:321-33; PMID:4708138; http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/jez.1401840305.
51. Solovei I, Gaginskaya E, Hutchison N, Macgregor H. Avian sex chromosomes in the lampbrush form: the ZW lampbrush bivalents from six species of bird. Chromosome Res 1993; 1:153-66; PMID:8156154; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00710769.
52. Morgan GT. Working with oocyte nuclei: cytological preparations of active chromatin and nuclear bodies from amphibian germinal vesicles. Methods Mol Biol 2008; 463:55-66; PMID:18951160; http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/978-1-59745-406-3_4.
53. Lessard JL. Two monoclonal antibodies to actin: one muscle selective and one generally reactive. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1988; 10:349-62; PMID:2460261; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cm.970100302.