A lexical analysis of environmental sound categories

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 52-80

  Houix, Olivier ^a   Lemaitre, Guillaume ^a   Misdariis, Nicolas ^a   Susini, Patrick ^a   Urdapilleta, Isabel ^b  

^a Université Pierre et Marie Curie   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

Author keywords

Categorization; Classification task; Environmental sounds; Lexical analysis; Similarity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLASSIFICATION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SOUND;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOUND;

EID: 84863805683     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0026240     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abdi, H. (2007). The RV coefficient and the congruence coefficient. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (pp. 849-853). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Aglioti, S. M., & Pazzaglia, M. (2010). Representing actions through their sound. Experimental Brain Research, 14(3), 99-110. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2344-x
3. Aldrich, K. M., Hellier, E. J., & Edworthy, J. (2009). What determines auditory similarity? The effect of stimulus group and methodology. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 63-83. doi: 10.1080/17470210701814451
4. Ament, V. T. (2009). The Foley grail: The art of performing sound for film, games, and animation. Oxford, England: Focal Press.
5. Ballas, J. A., & Howard, J. H. (1987). Interpreting the language of environmental sounds. Environment & Behavior, 19(1), 91-114. doi: 10.1177/0013916587191005
6. Ballas, J. A., & Mullins, R. T. (1991). Effects of context on the identification of everyday sounds. Human Performance, 4, 199-219. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup0403_3
7. Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211-227. doi: 10.3758/BF03196968
8. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling. Theory and applications. New York, NY: Springer.
9. Cabe, P. A., & Pittenger, J. B. (2000). Human sensitivity to acoustic information from vessel filling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 313-324. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.313
10. Cano, P., Koppenberger, M., Herrera, P., & Celma, O. (2004). Sound effect taxonomy management in production environments. In Proceedings of 25th international AES conference (pp. T3-2). London, England: Audio Engineering Society.
11. Cano, P., Koppenberger, M., Le Groux, S., Ricard, J., Wack, N., & Herrera, P. (2004, May). Nearest-neighbor generic sound classification with a wordnet-based taxonomy. Paper presented at the Audio Engineering Society Convention 116, Berlin, Germany.
12. Carello, C., Anderson, K. L., & Kunkler-Peck, A. J. (1998). Perception of the length by sound. Psychological Science, 9, 211-214. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00040
13. Cummings, A., Èponienë, R., Koyama, A., Saygin, A. P., Townsend, J., & Dick, F. (2006). Auditory semantic networks for words and natural sounds. Brain Research, 1115, 92-107. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.050
14. Drioli, C., Polotti, P., Rocchesso, D., Delle Monache, S., Adiloglu, K., Robert, A., & Obermayer, K. (2009). Auditory representations as landmarks in the sound design space. In Sixth proceedings of sound and music computing conference (pp. 315-20). Porto, Portugal: SMC.
15. Dubois, D. (2000). Categories as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 35-68.
16. Fellbaum, C. (1998). Wordnet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://isbn.nu/9780262061971
17. Gaver, W. W. (1993a). How do we hear in the world ? Explorations in ecological acoustics. Ecological Psychology, 5, 285-313. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco0504_2
18. Gaver, W. W. (1993b). What is the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5, 1-29. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco0501_1
19. Giordano, B. L., & McAdams, S. (2006). Material identification of real impact sounds: Effects of size variation in steel, glass, wood, and plexiglass plates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1171-1881. doi: 10.1121/1.2149839
20. Giordano, B. L., McDonnell, J., & McAdams, S. (2010). Hearing living symbols and nonliving icons: Category specificities in the cognitive processing of environmental sounds. Brain and Cognition, 73, 7-19. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.01.005
21. Goldstone, R. L. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125-157. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90065-5
22. Grassi, M. (2005). Do we hear size or sound? Balls dropped on plates. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 274-284. doi: 10.3758/BF03206491
23. Gaver, W. W. (1993). What in the World Do We Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception, Copyright 1993 by Taylor & Francis Group, Inc., Ecological Psychology, 5, 15. http://www.informaworld.com
24. Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 887-892. doi: 10.1038/nrn1538
25. Guyot, F. (1996). Etude de la perception sonore en termes de reconnaissance et d'appréciation qualitative: Une approche par la catégorisation [A study of sound perception, in terms of recognition and qualitative appraisal]. Université du Maine, Le Mans.
26. Guyot, F., Castellengo, M., & Fabre, B. (1997). étude de la catégorisation d'un corpus de bruits domestiques [A study of the categorization of an everyday sound set]. Catégorisation et Cognition: De la Perception au Discours (pp. 41-58). Paris, France: éditions Kimé.
27. Gygi, B., Kidd, G. R., & Watson, C. S. (2004). Spectral-temporal factors in the identification of environmental sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 1252-1265. doi: 10.1121/1.1635840
28. Gygi, B., Kidd, G. R., & Watson, C. S. (2007). Similarity and categorization of environmental sounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 839-855. doi: 10.3758/BF03193921
29. Gygi, B., & Shafiro, V. (2007). General functions and specific applications of environmental sound research. Frontiers in Bioscience, 12, 3152-3166. doi: 10.2741/2303
30. Gygi, B., & Shafiro, V. (2010). Development of the database for environmental sound research and application (DESRA): Design, functionality, and retrieval considerations. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, 2010(Article ID 654914). doi: 10.1155/2010/654914
31. Hubert, L. J., Arabie, P., & Meulman, J. (2006). The structural representation of proximity matrices with MATLAB. ASA-SIAM Series on Statistics and Applied Probability. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, American Statistical Association.
32. Kim, N. G., Effken, J. A., & Shaw, R. E. (1995). Perceiving persistence under change and over structure. Ecological Psychology, 7, 217-256. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco0703_3
33. Kunkler-Peck, A. J., & Turvey, M. T. (2000). Hearing shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 279-294. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.279
34. Lakatos, S., McAdams, S., & Caussé, R. (1997). The representation of auditory source characteristics: Simple geometric form. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1180-1190. doi: 10.3758/BF03214206
35. Lebrun, N., Clochon, P., Etevenon, P., Lambert, J., Baron, J. C., & Eustache, F. (2001). An ERD mapping study of the neurocognitive processes involved in the perceptual and semantic analysis of environmental sounds and words. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 235-248. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00078-1
36. Lemaitre, G., Houix, O., Misdariis, N., & Susini, P. (2010). Listener expertise and sound identification influence the categorization of environmental sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 16-32. doi: 10.1037/a0018762
37. Lewis, J. W. (2004). Human brain regions involved in recognizing environmental sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1008-1021. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh061
38. Li, X., Logan, R. J., & Pastore, R. E. (1991). Perception of acoustic source characteristics: Walking sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 3036-3049. doi: 10.1121/1.401778
39. Lutfi, R. A. (2001). Auditory detection of hollowness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1010-1019. doi: 10.1121/1.1385903
40. Lutfi, R. A. (2008). Human sound source identification. In W. A. Yost, A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Eds.), Auditory perception of sound sources, Springer handbook of auditory research (pp. 13-42). New York, NY: Springer.
41. Lutfi, R. A., & Oh, E. (1997). Auditory discrimination of material changes in a struck-clamped bar. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3647-3656. doi: 10.1121/1.420151
42. Marcell, M. M., Borella, D., Greene, M., Kerr, E., & Rogers, S. (2000). Confrontation naming of environmental sounds. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 830-864. doi: 10.1076/jcen.22.6.830.949
43. McAdams, S. (1993). Recognition of sound sources and events. In S. McAdams & E. Bigand (Eds.), Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition (pp. 146-198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44. McAdams, S., Roussarie, V., Chaigne, A., & Giordano, B. L. (2010). The psychomechanics of simulated sound sources: Material properties of impacted thin plates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 1401-1413. doi: 10.1121/1.3466867
45. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.254
46. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
47. Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
48. Misdariis, N., Minard, A., Susini, P., Lemaitre, G., McAdams, S., & Parizet, E. (2010). Environmental sound perception: Metadescription and modeling based on independent primary studies. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, 2010(Article ID 362013). doi: 10.1155/2010/362013
49. Misdariis, N., Smith, B., Pressnitzer, D., Susini, P., & McAdams, S. (1998). Validation of a multidimensional distance model for perceptual dissimilarities among musical timbres. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 3005. doi: 10.1121/1.421751
50. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39
51. Peeters, G., & Deruty, E. (2010). Sound indexing using morphological description. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 18, 675-687. doi: 10.1109/TASL.2009.2038809
52. Pittenger, J., & Shaw, R. (1975). Aging faces as viscal-elastic events: Implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 374-382. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.1.4.374
53. Pizzamiglio, L., Aprile, T., Spitoni, G., Pitzalis, S., Bates, E., D'Amico, S., & Di Russo, F. (2005). Separate neural systems for processing action-or non-action-related sounds. NeuroImage, 24, 852-861. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.025
54. Reinert, M. (1986). Un logiciel d'analyse lexicale: ALCESTE [Software for lexical analysis: ALCESTE]. Les Cahiers de l'Analyse des Données, 11, 471-484.
55. Repp, B. H. (1987). The sound of two hands clapping: An exploratory study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 1100-1109. doi: 10.1121/1.394630
56. Rips, L. J., & Collins, A. (1993). Categories and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 468-486. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.4.468
57. Roma, G., Janer, J., Kersten, S., Schirosa, M., Herrera, P., & Serra, X. (2010). Ecological acoustics perspective for content-based retrieval of environmental sounds. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, 2010, 1-11. doi: 10.1155/2010/960863
58. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erl-baum.
59. Ross, B. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1999). Food for thought: Cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 495-553. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0712
60. Sauvageot, F., Urdapilleta, I., & Peyron, D. (2006). Within and between variations of texts elicited from nine wine experts. Food Quality and Preference, 17, 429-444. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.05.007
61. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and under-standing: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Shakespeare, W. (1992). The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark (B.A. Mowat & P. Werstine, Eds.). New York: Washington Square-Pocket.
63. Shaw, R., Flascher, O., & Mace, W. (1996). Dimensions of event percep-tion. Handbook of Perception and Action, 1, 345-395. doi: 10.1016/S1874-5822(96)80013-2
64. Sloutsky, V. M. (2003). The role of similarity in the development of categorization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 246-251. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00109-8
65. Susini, P., Houix, O., Misdariis, N., Smith, B., & Langlois, S. (2009). Instruction's effect on semantic scale ratings of interior car sounds. Applied Acoustics, 70, 389-403. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.06.008
66. Truax, B. (2001). Acoustic communication (2nd ed). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing Corp.
67. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organisation of memory (pp. 381-402). London, England: Academic Press.
68. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
69. Vanderveer, N. J. (1979). Ecological acoustics: Human perception of environmental sounds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
70. Warren, W. H., & Verbrugge, R. R. (1984). Auditory perception of breaking and boucing events: A case study in ecological acoustics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor-mance, 10, 704-712. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.704
71. Wold, E., Blum, T., Keislar, D., & Wheaten, J. (2002). Content-based classification, search, and retrieval of audio. Multimedia IEEE, 3, 27-36. doi: 10.1109/93.556537