Dystocia as a cause of untimely cesarean section;Distocija kao uzrok nepravovremenog carskog reza

Vojnosanitetski Pregled

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 589-593

  Djurić, Janko ^a   Arsenijević, Slobodan ^a   Banković, Dragic ^b   Protrka, Zoran ^a   Sorak, Marija ^a   Dimitrijević, Aleksandra ^a   Tanasković, Irena ^c  

^a CLINICAL CENTRE KRAGUJEVAC   (Serbia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KRAGUJEVAC   (Serbia)

^c University of Krajevac   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Apgar score; Cesarean section; Dystocia; Infant newborn; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; ASPHYXIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NEWBORN; NEWBORN ASSESSMENT; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

APGAR SCORE; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84863795509     PISSN: 00428450     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2298/VSP110210005D     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Notzon FC, Cnattingius S, Bergsjø P, Cole S, Taffel S, Irgens L, et al. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170(2): 495-504.
2. Choudhury AP, Dawson AJ. Trends in indications for caesarean sections over 7 years in a Welsh district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 29(8): 714-7.
3. Stjemrnolm YV, Petersson K, Eneroth E. Changed indications for cesarean sections. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89(1): 49-53.
4. Bregar AT, Cerar VM, Slavec ZZ, Verdenik I. Indications fof cesarean delivery between 1955 and 2005. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2008; 120(23-24): 761-5.
5. Porreco RP, Thorp JA. The cesarean birth epidemic: trends, causes, and solutions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175(2): 369-74.
6. Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187(4): 824-8.
7. Festin MR, Laopaiboon M, Pattanittum P, Ewens MR, Henderson-Smart DJ, Crowther CA. Caesarean section in four South East Asian countries: reasons for, rates, associated care practices and health outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009; 9: 17.
8. Geidam AD, Audu BM, Kawuwa BM, Obed JY. Rising trend and indications of caesarean section at the university of Maiduguri teaching hospital, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2009; 8(2): 127-32.
9. Driul L, Londero AP, Salvador S, Fruscalzo A, Peris Bhat SA, Citossi A, et al. Retrospective analysis of one year of cesarean sections: indications and risk factors associated with intrapartum cesarean section. Minerva Ginecol 2010; 62(5): 403-14. (Italian)
10. Algovik M, Kivinen K, Peterson H, Westgren M, Kere J. Genetic evidence of multiple loci in dystocia-difficult labour. BMC Med Genet 2010; 11: 105.
11. Robson MS, Scudamore IW, Walsh SM. Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174(1 Pt 1): 199-205.
12. Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O'Herlihy C. Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98(6): 1027-31.
13. MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I, Annan B. Indications for caesarean section in a consultant obstetric unit over three decades. J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 23(3): 233-8.
14. Tan WC, Devendra K, Tan AS. Changing trends in indications for caesarean sections in a tertiary hospital. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2003; 32(3): 299-304.
15. Paul RH, Miller DA. Cesarean birth: how to reduce the rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172(6): 1903-7; discussion 1907-11.
16. Vejnović T, Momčilov P, Tabš D, Petrović D{stroke}. Caesarean section in Serbia today. Ginecol Perinatol 2004; 1(1-2): 5-13.
17. Malkin JD. Not as much as you think: toward a truer estimate of the difference in direct medical costs between vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Birth 2001; 28(3): 208-9.