General practitioners' preferences for the organisation of primary care: A discrete choice experiment

Health Policy

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 246-256

  Pedersen, Line Bjørnskov ^a   Kjær, Trine ^a   Kragstrup, Jakob ^a   Gyrd Hansen, Dorte ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Denmark; Discrete choice experiment; General practice; Organisation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DECISION MAKING; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INTERHOSPITAL COOPERATION; JOB SATISFACTION; PERSONNEL SHORTAGE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; WORK SCHEDULE;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DENMARK; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HUMANS; JOB SATISFACTION; PRACTICE MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84863784547     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: 18726054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Wordsworth S., Skåtun D., Scott A., French F. Preferences for general practice jobs: a survey of principals and sessional GPs. British Journal of General Practitioners 2004, 54:740-746.
2. Strandberg-Larsen M., Nielsen M., Vallgårda S., Krasnik A., Vrangbæk K. Denmark: health system review. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies 2007.
3. Laurant M., Reeves D., Hermens R., Braspenning J., Grol R., Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, (2):CD001271.
4. Richards A., Carley J., Jenkins-Clarke S., Richards D.A. Skill mix between nurses and doctors working in primary care-delegation or allocation: a review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2000, 37(3):185-197.
5. Charles-Jones H., Latimer J., May C. Transforming general practice: the redistribution of medical work in primary care. Sociology of Health and Illness 2003, 25(January (1)):71-92.
6. Danske Regioner Organisering af almen praksis. Underrapport: Almen praksis i fremtidens sundhedsvæsen 2007, Danske Regioner.
7. Praktiserende Lægers Organisation Medlemsundersøgelse marts 2008 2008, Praktiserende Lægers Organisation.
8. Praktiserende Lægers Organisation Faktaark om almen praksis 2010, p. 1-3, http://www.laeger.dk/portal/page/portal/LAEGERDK/Laegerdk/P_L_O/Om%20PLO/Tal%20og%20publikationer/Statistik%20om%20almen%20praksis, December 22, 2011.
9. Scott A. Eliciting GPs' preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. Journal of Health Economics 2001, 20(May (3)):329-347.
10. Gosden T., Bowler I., Sutton M. How do general practitioners choose their practice? Preferences for practice and job characteristics. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2000, 5:208-213.
11. Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL) General Practitioner & GP Registrar 2008, Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL)
12. French F., Andrew J., Awramenko M., Coutts H., Leighton-Beck L., Mollison J., et al. General practitioner non-principals benefit from flexible working. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2005, 19(1):5-15.
13. Scott A., Gravelle H., Simoens S., Bojke C., Sibbald B. Job satisfaction and quitting intentions: a structural model of British general practitioners. British Journal of Industrial Relations 2006, 44(3):519-540.
14. Simoens S., Scott A., Sibbald B. Job satisfaction, work-related stress and intentions to quit of Scottish GPS. Scottish Medical Journal 2002, 47(August (4)):80-86.
15. Jobe J. Cognitive psychology and self-reports: models and methods. Quality of Life Research 2003, 12(3):219-227.
16. Bateman I., Carson R., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., et al. Economic valuation with stated preferences techniques: a manual 2002, Edward Elgar Publishing.
17. Danske Bank Marts 2010. Middelkurser i København 2010, http://www.danskebank.dk/da-dk/Privat/Daglig-oekonomi/Valuta/Documents/Valutaoversigt2010/ValutaMarts2010.pdf, July 22, 2010.
18. Krasnik A., Goenewegen P., Pedersen P., Scholten P., Mooney G., Gottschau A., et al. Changing remuneration systems: effects on activity in general practice. British Medical Journal 1990, 300:1698-1701.
19. ChoiceMetrics Ngene 1.0 User manual & reference guide. The cutting edge in experimental design 2009.
20. Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press.
21. Bech M., Gyrd-Hansen D. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. Health Economics 2005, 14(10):1079-1083.
22. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Frontiers of econometrics 1974, 105-142. Academic Press, London. P. Zarembka (Ed.).
23. Hole A.R. A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. Health Economics 2007, 16(8):827-840.
24. Swait J., Louviere J. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. Journal of Marketing Research 1993, 30(3):305-314.
25. Praktiserende Lægers Organisation Lægepopulationen og lægepraksispopulationen 1977-2010 2010.
26. Kristensen T., Olsen K., Pedersen K. Stordriftsfordele og optimal størrelse i almen praksis: En empirisk undersøgelse af alment praktiserende læger i Danmark. Symposium i anvendt statistik 2009 2008, 122-135. P. Linde (Ed.).