The sex specificity of hip-joint muscles offers an explanation for better results in men after total hip arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1143-1148

  Preininger, Bernd ^a   Schmorl, Kathrin ^a   Von Roth, Philipp ^a   Winkler, Tobias ^a   Matziolis, Georg ^a   Perka, Carsten ^a   Tohtz, Stephan ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; BODY WEIGHT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLUTEUS MAXIMUS MUSCLE; GLUTEUS MEDIUS MUSCLE; HIP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEN'S HEALTH; MUSCLE MASS; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TENSOR FACIAE LATAE MUSCLE; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; TISSUE STRUCTURE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84863777381     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1411-7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Muller M et al (2011) Age-related appearance of muscle trauma in primary total hip arthroplasty and the benefit of a minimally invasive approach for patients older than 70 years. Int Orthop 35(2):165-171
2. Muller M et al (2011) Muscle trauma in primary total hip arthroplasty depending on age, BMI, and surgical approach: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach. Orthopade 40(3):217-223
3. Muller M et al (2010) Evidence of reduced muscle trauma through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach by means of MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(12):3192-3200
4. Preininger B et al (2011) Earlier postoperative mobilization with minimally invasive hip hemiarthroplasty.Unfallchirurg 114(4):333-339
5. Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB (2011) Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Int Orthop 35(2):173-184
6. Cheng T et al (2009) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 33(6):1473-1481
7. Singh JA, Lewallen DG (2010) Predictors of activity limitation and dependence on walking aids after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(12):2387-2393
8. Kennedy DM et al (2006) Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(4):559-566 (Pubitemid 43866399)
9. Cushnaghan J et al (2007) Long-term outcome following total hip arthroplasty: a controlled longitudinal study. Arthritis Rheum 57 (8):1375-1380 (Pubitemid 350308833)
10. Busato A et al (2008) Influence of high BMI on functional outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Obes Surg 18(5):595-600
11. Santaguida PL et al (2008) Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Can J Surg 51(6):428-436
12. Lavernia CJ et al (2011) Ethnic and racial factors influencing well-being, perceived pain, and physical function after primary total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(7):1838-1845
13. Ethgen O et al (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(5):963-974 (Pubitemid 38619796)
14. Nakahara I et al (2011) Gender differences in 3D morphology and bony impingement of human hips. J Orthop Res 29(3):333-339
15. Tamari K et al (2006) Ethnic-, gender-, and age-related differences in femorotibial angle, femoral antetorsion, and tibiofibular torsion: cross-sectional study among healthy Japanese and Australian Caucasians. Clin Anat 19(1):59-67 (Pubitemid 43172802)
16. Tohtz SW et al (2010) CT evaluation of native acetabular orientation and localization: sex-specific data comparison on 336 hip joints. Technol Health Care 18(2):129-136
17. Unnanuntana A et al (2010) Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry using digital photographs. J Orthop Res 28(11):1399-1404
18. Preininger B et al (2011) A formula to predict patients' gluteus medius muscle volume from hip joint geometr. Man Ther 16 (5):447-451
19. Grimaldi A et al (2009) The association between degenerative hip joint pathology and size of the gluteus maximus and tensor fascia lata muscles. Man Ther 14(6):611-617
20. Grimaldi A et al (2009) The association between degenerative hip joint pathology and size of the gluteus medius, gluteus minimus and piriformis muscles. Man Ther 14(6):605-610
21. Akagi R et al (2009) Muscle volume compared to cross-sectional area is more appropriate for evaluating muscle strength in young and elderly individuals. Age Ageing 38(5):564-569
22. Akagi R et al (2009) Relationships between muscle strength and indices of muscle cross-sectional area determined during maximal voluntary contraction in middle-aged and elderly individuals. J Strength Cond Res 23(4):1258-1262
23. Morrey BF et al (1997) Difficult complications after hip joint replacement. Dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:179-187 (Pubitemid 27490648)
24. Ali Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds IS (1981) Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63-B (2):214-218 (Pubitemid 11098768)
25. Quintana JM et al (2009) Predictors of health-related quality-of-life change after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 (11):2886-2894
26. Singh JA, Sloan JA (2008) Health-related quality of life in veterans with prevalent total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Rheumatology 47(12):1826-1831