How you think about your intelligence influences how adjusted you are: Implicit theories and adjustment outcomes

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 705-709

  King, Ronnel B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Adjustment; Entity; Filipino; Implicit theories of intelligence; Incremental; Well being

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863775255     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.031     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aronson J., Fried C., Good C. Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2002, 38:113-125.
2. Bernardo A.B.I. Talking about good and bad learners. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 2012, 10:195-212.
3. Bernardo A.B.I., Posecion O.T., Reganit A.R., Rodriguez-Rivera E. Adapting the Social Axioms Survey for Philippine research: Validating Filipino and English versions. Philippine Journal of Psychology 2005, 38(2):77-100.
4. Blackwell L.S., Trzesniewski K., Dweck C.S. Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development 2007, 78:246-263.
5. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming 2010, Routledge, New York. 2nd ed.
6. Crocker J., Karpinski A., Quinn D.M., Chase S.K. When grades determine self-worth: Consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85(3):507-516.
7. Dweck C.S. Self-Theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development 1999, Taylor and Francis/Psychology Press, Philadelphia.
8. Dweck C.S., Grant H. Self-theories, goals, and meaning (pp. 405-416). The handbook of motivational science 2008, Guilford, New York. J. Shah, W. Gardner (Eds.).
9. Dweck C.S., Leggett E.L. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review 1988, 95:256-273.
10. Dweck C.S., Molden D.C. Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. The handbook of competence and motivation 2005, Guilford, New York. A. Elliot, C.S. Dweck (Eds.).
11. Dweck C.S. Self-Theories. Handbook of theories in social psychology 2011, 43-61. Sage, London. P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, E.T. Higgins (Eds.).
12. Eccles J.S., Roeser R.W. Schools as developmental contexts. Blackwell handbook of adolescence 2003, 129-148. Blackwell, Malden, MA. G. Adams, M.D. Berzonsky (Eds.).
13. Ganotice F.A., Bernardo A. Validating the factors of the English and Filipino versions of Sense of Self Scale. Philippine Journal of Psychology 2010, 43:81-99.
14. Ganotice, F. A., Bernardo, A. B. I., & King, R. B. (2012). Testing the factorial invariance of the English and Filipino versions of the Inventory of School Motivation with bilingual students in the Philippines. Published Online First 4 April 2012. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. doi:10.1177/0734282911435459.
15. Good C., Aronson J., Inzlicht M. Improving adolescents' standardized test performance. An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2003, 24:645-662.
16. Grant H., Dweck C.S. Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85:541-553.
17. Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioural science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2010, 33:111-135.
18. Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 2010, 466:29.
19. Hong Y.Y., Chiu C., Dweck C.S., Lin D., Wan W. Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:588-599.
20. Jones D. A WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists' studies. Science 2010, 328:1627.
21. Kwan V.S.Y., Bond M.H., Singelis T.M. Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73:1038-1051.
22. Luhtanen R., Crocker J. A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1992, 18:302-318.
23. Mackinnon A., Jorm A.F., Christensen H., Korten A.E., Jacomb P.A., Rodgers B. A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences 1999, 27:405-416.
24. Molden D.C., Dweck C.S. Finding "meaning" in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist 2006, 61:192-203.
25. Robins R.W., Pals J.L. Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity 2002, 1:313-316.
26. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image 1965, Princeton University Press, Princeton, HJ.
27. Skinner E.A., Kindermann T.J., Furrer C.J. A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2009, 69:493-525.
28. Stewart S.M., Byrne B.M., Lee P.W.H., Ho L.M., Kennard B.D., Hughes C., et al. Personal versus interpersonal contributions to depressive symptoms among Hong Kong adolescents. International Journal of Psychology 2003, 38:160-169.