Postpolitical correctness?

Planning Theory

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 319-327

  Bylund, Jonas ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

academic dynamics; conceptual binaries; planning studies; political correctness; postpolitics; proper political

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; LEGISLATION; PLANNING PROCESS; POLITICAL CHANGE;

EID: 84863770638     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095211434628     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allmendinger P,Haughton G.Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2010;28:803-818.
2. Beck URisk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE Publications; 1992.
3. Biermann F,Betsill MM,Gupta J,Kanie N,Lebel L,Liverman D, et alEarth System Governance Report 1, IHDP Report 20. Bonn: IHDP/The Earth System Governance Project; 2009.
4. Braun BA Companion to Cultural Geography. Duncan JSJohnson NCSchein RH, ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2004:151-179.
5. Cloke P,Johnston RSpaces of Geographical Thought: Deconstructing Human Geography's Binaries. Cloke PJohnston R, ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2005:1-20.
6. Participation: The New Tyranny?. Cooke BKothari U, ed. London: Zed Books; 2001.
7. Davy B.Plan it without a condom!.Planning Theory. 2008;7 (3): 301-317.
8. Dikeç M.Space, politics, and the political.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2005;23:171-188.
9. Dombrowski K.Filling the gap? An analysis of non-governmental organizations' responses to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance.International Environmental Agreements. 2010;10 (4): 397-416.
10. Fainstein SS.New directions in planning theory.Urban Affairs Review. 2000;35 (4): 451-478.
11. Gunder M.Fake until you make it, and then.Planning Theory. 2011;10 (3): 201-212.
12. Habermas JThe Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2001.
13. Harman GPrince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne: re.press; 2009.
14. Heclo HThe New American Political System. King A, ed. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research; 1978:87-124.
15. Held DDemocracy's Edges. Shapiro IHacker-Cordon C, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:84-111.
16. Hillier J.Agon'izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be 'real.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (1): 37-59.
17. Honig BPolitical Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1993.
18. Isin EF.Engaging, being, political.Political Geography. 2005;24:373-387.
19. Latour BThe Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1988.
20. Latour BMaking Things Public - Atmospheres of Democracy. Latour BWeibel P, ed. Karlsruhe: Engelhardt & Bauer; 2005a:4-31.
21. Latour BReassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005b.
22. Law JAfter Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Oxon: Routledge; 2004.
23. LawJ (2009) The Greer-Bush Test: On Politics in STS (version of 23 December 2009). Available at: http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2009TheGreer-BushTest.pdf (accessed 10 August 2010).
24. Lukes SPower: A Radical View. London: MacMillan; 1974ssss.
25. MarresNS (2005) No issue, no public: Democratic deficits after the displacement of politics. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
26. Marres NPolitical Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life. Braun BWhatmore SJ, ed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 2010:177-210.
27. Massey D.Editorial: Time to think.Transactions of the Insitute of British Geographers. 2002;27:259-261.
28. Melville HBartleby, The Scrivener. Hoboken, NJ: Melville House Publishing; 2004.
29. Mouffe COn the Political: Thinking in Action. London: Routledge; 2005.
30. Olsson G.Palimpsest.Cartographica. 2009;44 (2): 101-109.
31. Oosterlynck S,Swyngedouw E.Noise reduction: The postpolitical quandary of night flights at Brussels Airport.Environment and Planning A. 2010;42:1577-1594.
32. Pløger J.Strife: Urban planning and agonism.Planning Theory. 2004;3 (1): 71-92.
33. Rancière JDisagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1999.
34. SaundersF (2011) The politics of people: Not just mangroves and monkeys. PhD thesis, School of Life Science, Huddinge, Södertörn University, Sweden.
35. Schattschneider EEThe Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; 1960.
36. Demokratiutredningens betänkande, SOU 2000:1. Stockholm: Statens offentliga utredningar; 2000.
37. Stengers IMaking Things Public - Atmospheres of Democracy. Latour BWeibel P, ed. Karlsruhe: Engelhardt & Bauer; 2005:994-1003.
38. Stengers IPolitical Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life. Braun BWhatmore SJ, ed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 2010:3-34.
39. Swyngedouw E.The antinomies of the postpolitical city: in search of a democratic politics of environmental production.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2009;33 (3): 601-620.
40. Swyngedouw E.Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian politicial spaces.Political Geography. 2011;30 (7): 370-380.
41. Wildavsky A.If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing.Policy Sciences. 1973;4:127-153.
42. Winner L.Do artifacts have politics?.Daedalus. 1980;109:121-136.
43. Woolgar S.After word? - On some dynamics of duality interrogation. Or: why bonfires are not enough.Theory, Culture & Society. 2002;19 (5/6): 261-270.
44. Žižek SNew York: Verso; 1999.