Contact lens-related dry eye and ocular surface changes with mapping technique in long-term soft silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 22, Issue SUPPLEMENT N. 7, 2012, Pages

  Sengor, Tomris ^a   Kurna, Sevda Aydin ^a   Ozbay, Nurver ^a   Ertek, Semahat ^a   Aki, Suat ^a   Altun, Ahmet ^a  

^a Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Training Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Contact lens side effects; Dry eye; Impression cytology; Ocular surface

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRY EYE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY; MALE; METAPLASIA; OCULAR SURFACE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHIRMER TEST; SILICONE HYDROGEL CONTACT LENS; SOFT CONTACT LENS; TEAR FILM; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; CONJUNCTIVA DISEASE; FLUOROPHOTOMETRY; HYDROGEL; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; LACRIMAL FLUID; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

COLORING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DYE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; SILICONE DERIVATIVE; SILICONE POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL COPOLYMER;

ADULT; COLORING AGENTS; CONJUNCTIVAL DISEASES; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; DRY EYE SYNDROMES; FEMALE; FLUOROPHOTOMETRY; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; LISSAMINE GREEN DYES; MALE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SILICONES; TEARS;

EID: 84863761796     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000079     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Connor CG, Campbell JB, Steel SA. The effects of disposable daily wear contact lenses on goblet cell count. CLAO J 1997; 23: 37-9.
2. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patientrelated factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1319-28.
3. Lievens CW, Connor CG, Murphy H. Comparing goblet cell densities in patients wearing disposable hydrogel contact lenses versus silicone hydrogel contact lenses in an extended-wear modality. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: 241-4.
4. Fonn D, Pritchard N, Dumbleton K, et al. Factors affecting the success of silicone hydrogels. In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000: 214-34.
5. Egbert PR, Lauber S, Maurice DM. A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol 1977; 84: 798-801.
6. Nelson JD, Havener VR, Cameron JD. Cellulose acetate impressions of the ocular surface: dry eye states. Arch Ophthalmol 1983; 101: 1869-72.
7. Tseng SC. Staging of conjunctival squamous metaplasia by impression cytology. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 728-33.
8. Simon P, Jaison SG, Chopra SK, Jacob S. Conjunctival impression cytology in contact lens wearers. Indian J Ophthalmol 2002; 50: 301-6.
9. Knop E, Brewitt H. Induction of epithelial conjunctival epithelial alteration by contact lens wearing: a prospective study. Ger J Ophthalmol 1992; 1: 125-34.
10. Knop E, Brewitt H. Conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic wearers of soft contact lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1992; 230: 340-7.
11. Grene RB, Lankston P. Cartography of impression cytology. Cornea 1990; 9: 275-8.
12. Sengör T, Gürdal C, Kirimlioglu H, Irkeç M, Aydin S. Colourcoded mapping technique in impression cytology: findings in soft contact lens wearers and patients with other external eye diseases. Ophthalmologica 2002; 216: 155-8.
13. Sall K, Stevenson OD, Mundorf TK, Reis BL. Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease: CsA Phase 3 Study Group. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 631-9.
14. Walt JG, Rowe MM, Stern KL. Evaluating the functional impact of dry eye: the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Drug Inf J 1997; 31: 1436.
15. Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute /Industry Workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J 1995; 21: 222-32.
16. Nichols JJ, Ziegler C, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK. Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 1911-4.
17. Farris RL. The dry eye: its mechanisms and therapy, with Disease Index evidence that contact lens is a cause. CLAO J 1986; 12: 234-46.
18. Efron N, Brennan NA. A survey of wearers of low water content hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 1988; 71: 86-90.
19. Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Doane MG. Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 194-204.
20. Little SA, Bruce AS. Postlens tear film morphology, lens movement and symptoms in hydrogel lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994: 14: 65-9.
21. Brennan NA, Jaworski A, Shuley V, et al. Studies of the postlens tear film. Optom Vis Sci 2001: 78: 51.
22. Young G, Efron N. Characteristics of the pre-lens tear film during hydrogel contact lens wear. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1991: 11: 53-8.
23. Korb DR. Tear film-contact lens interactions. Adv Exp Med Biol 1994; 350: 403-10.
24. Pritchard N, Fonn D. Dehydration, lens movement and dryness ratings of hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995; 15: 281-6.
25. Aragona P, Ferreri G, Micali A, et al. Morphological changes of the conjunctival epithelium in contact lens wearers evaluated by impression cytology. Eye 1998; 12: 461-6.
26. Çakmak SS, Ünlü K, Karaca C, Nergiz Y, Ipek S. Effects of soft contact lenses on conjunctival surface. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: 230-3.
27. Pisella PJ, Malet F, Lejeune S, et al. Ocular surface changes induced by contact lens wear. Cornea 2001; 20: 820-2.
28. Tomatir DK, Erda N, Gürlü VP. Effects of different contact lens materials and contact lens-wearing periods on conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens 2008; 34: 166-8.
29. Adar S, Kanpolat A, Surucu S, et al. Conjunctival impression cytology in patients wearing contact lenses. Cornea 1997; 16: 289-94.
30. Keay L, Edwards K, Stapleton F. An early assessment of silicone hydrogel safety: pearls and pitfalls, and current status. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 358-63.
31. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacopsen G, et al. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 456.
32. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 40-6.
33. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Chalmers R, Begley C. The performance of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens-related dry eye. Cornea 2002; 21: 469-75.
34. Anshu, Munshi MM, Sathe V, Ganar A. Conjunctival impression cytology in contact lens wearers. Cytopathology 2001; 12: 314-20.