No beneficial effects evident for enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 in weaned pigs infected with salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium DT104

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 4816-4825

  Kreuzer, Susanne ^a   Janczyk, Pawel ^b   Aßmus, Jens ^a   Schmidt, Michael F G ^c   Brockmann, Gudrun A ^a   Nöckler, Karsten ^b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT   (Germany)

^c FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

B CELLS; BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; CYTOTOXIC; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FEED ADDITIVES; HUMORAL IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNE RESPONSE; LYMPH NODE; PEYER'S PATCHES; PROBIOTIC BACTERIA; PROBIOTICS; S. TYPHIMURIUM; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM; T CELLS; UNTREATED CONTROL;

BACILLI; CELLS; IMMUNOLOGY; SALMONELLA;

CYTOLOGY;

PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ABUNDANCE; BACTERIAL DISEASE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASE TREATMENT; FECAL COLIFORM; FECES; FEEDING; IMMUNE RESPONSE; PIG; PROBIOTICS; WEANING;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL SALMONELLOSIS; ARTICLE; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FECES; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IMMUNOLOGY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PALATINE TONSIL; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SWINE; SWINE DISEASE; WEANING;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FECES; PALATINE TONSIL; PROBIOTICS; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES; WEANING;

EUROPE;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SUBSP. ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SUIDAE;

EID: 84863758697     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00395-12     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Casey PG, et al. 2007. A five-strain probiotic combination reduces pathogen shedding and alleviates disease signs in pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:1858-1863.
2. Denyer MS, Wileman TE, Stirling CM, Zuber B, Takamatsu HH. 2006. Perforin expression can define CD8 positive lymphocyte subsets in pigs allowing phenotypic and functional analysis of natural killer, cytotoxic T, natural killer T and MHC unrestricted cytotoxic T-cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 110:279-292.
3. European Food Safety Authority. 2010. The community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses and zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008. EFSA J. 8:1496.
4. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2003. Additives for use in animal nutrition. Regulation (EC) no. 1831/2003. Offic. J. Eur. Parliament Council 203:L268/29.
5. FAO/WHO. 2001. Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. FAO/WHO, Rome, Italy.
6. Fedorka-Cray PJ, Whipp SC, Isaacson RE, Nord N, Lager K. 1994. Transmission of Salmonella Typhimurium to swine. Vet. Microbiol. 41: 333-344.
7. Forchielli ML, Walker WA. 2005. The role of gut-associated lymphoid tissues and mucosal defence. Br. J. Nutr. 93(Suppl.):S41-S48.
8. Gerner W, Kaser T, Saalmuller A. 2009. Porcine T lymphocytes and NK cells-an update. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 33:310-320.
9. Hallstrom K, McCormick BA. 2011. Salmonella interaction with and passage through the intestinal mucosa: through the lens of the organism. Front. Microbiol. 2:1-10.
10. Majowicz SE, et al. 2010. The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 50:882-889.
11. Männer KBK, Schneider D. 1991. Verbesserung der Gesundheit von Ferkeln und Sauen. Kraftfutter 5:227-231.
12. Martin L, et al. 2011. Influence of Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 on performance, small intestinal morphology, gene expression and brush border enzyme activity in piglets, p 55. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Probiotics and Prebiotics IPC2011. Pamida International, Kosice, Slovakia.
13. Pineiro C, et al. 2009. Pig-MAP and haptoglobin concentration reference values in swine from commercial farms. Vet. J. 179:78-84.
14. Pollmann M, Nordhoff M, Pospischil A, Tedin K, Wieler LH. 2005. Effects of a probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecium on the rate of natural chlamydia infection in swine. Infect. Immun. 73:4346-4353.
15. Romeo J, et al. 2010. Immunomodulatory effect of fibres, probiotics and synbiotics in different life-stages. Nutr. Hosp. 25:341-349.
16. Saxelin M, Tynkkynen S, Mattila-Sandholm T, de Vos WM. 2005. Probiotic and other functional microbes: from markets to mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16:204-211.
17. Segales J, et al. 2004. Haptoglobin and pig-major acute protein are increased in pigs with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS). Vet. Res. 35:275-282.
18. Sinkora M, Butler JE, Holtmeier W, Sinkorova J. 2005. Lymphocyte development in fetal piglets: facts and surprises. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 108:177-184.
19. Sinkora M, et al. 1998. Prenatal ontogeny of lymphocyte subpopulations in pigs. Immunology 95:595-603.
20. Soccol CR, et al. 2010. The potential of probiotics: a review. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 48:413-434.
21. Szabo I, et al. 2009. Influence of a probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecium on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 infection in a porcine animal infection model. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:2621-2628.
22. Taras D, Vahjen W, Macha M, Simon O. 2006. Performance, diarrhea incidence, and occurrence of Escherichia coli virulence genes during longterm administration of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain to sows and piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 84:608-617.
23. Yang H, Parkhouse RM. 1996. Phenotypic classification of porcine lymphocyte subpopulations in blood and lymphoid tissues. Immunology 89: 76-83.
24. Zeyner A, Boldt E. 2006. Effects of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain supplemented from birth to weaning on diarrhoea patterns and performance of piglets. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 90:25-31.