This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of 'open science'

BioSocieties

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 140-168

  Kelty, Christopher M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

genetics; intellectual property; moral economy; newsletters; open science; synthetic biology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863744651     PISSN: 17458552     EISSN: 17458560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/biosoc.2012.8     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Ankeny, R.A. (1997) The Conqueror Worm: An Historical and Philosophical Examination of the Use of the Nematode C. elegans as a Model Organism. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
2. Ankeny, R.A. (2000) Fashioning descriptive models in biology: Of worms and wiring diagrams. Philosophy of Science 67(Supplement): S260-S272.
3. Ankeny, R.A. (2001) The natural history of Caenorhabditis elegans research. Nature Reviews Genetics 2(6): 474-479. (Pubitemid 33673414)
4. Ankeny, R.A. (2007)Wormy logic: Model organisms as case-based reasoning. In: A.N.H. Creager, E. Lunbeck and M. N. Wise (eds.) Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives. Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press.
5. Ankeny, R.A. and Leonelli, S. (2011) What's so special about model organisms? Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42(2): 313-323.
6. Barry, A. (2005) Pharmaceutical matters: The invention of informed materials. Theory, Culture & Society 22(1): 51-69.
7. Benkler, Y. (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8. Bennett, G. (2010) What is a part? BioFab Human Practices Report 1.0, http://www.biofab.org/sites/default/files/HPIP-DraftReport-Parts-1.0.pdf, accessed 1 February 2012.
9. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2009a) Biomimetic chemistry and synthetic biology: A two-way traffic across the borders. Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 15(1): 31-46.
10. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2009b) Synthetic biology as a replica of synthetic chemistry? Uses and misuses of history. Biological Theory 4(4): 314-318.
11. Bernstein, L. (1992) Opting out of the legal system: Extralegal contractual relations in the diamond industry. The Journal of Legal Studies 21(1): 115-157.
12. Bernstein, L. (1996) Merchant law in a merchant court: Rethinking the code's search for immanent business norms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144(5): 1765-1821.
13. Bernstein, L. (2001) Private commercial law in the cotton industry: Creating cooperation through rules, norms, and institutions. Michigan Law Review 99(7): 1724-1790. (Pubitemid 33648907)
14. Biagioli, M. (2003) Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. New York and London: Routledge.
15. Blok, A. and Downey, G. (eds.) (2004) Uncovering Labour in Information Revolutions, 1750-2000. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Bowker, G.C. and Star, S.L. (2000) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
17. Boyle, J. (2008) The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Calvert, J. (2008) The commodification of emergence: Systems biology, synthetic biology and intellectual property. BioSocieties 3(4): 383-398.
19. Calvert, J. (2010) Synthetic biology: Constructing nature? The Sociological Review 58(S1): 95-112.
20. Campos, L. (2009) That was the synthetic biology that was. In: M. Schmidt, A. Kelle, A. Ganguli-Mitra and H. Vriend (eds.) Synthetic Biology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 5-21.
21. David, P. (1998) Common agency contracting and the emergence of 'Open Science' institutions. American Economic Review 88(2): 15-21. (Pubitemid 128451411)
22. David, P. (2004) Can 'Open Science' be protected from the evolving regime of IPR protections? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160(1): 9-34. (Pubitemid 38614563)
23. de Chadarevian, S. (1998) Of worms and programmes: Caenorhabditis elegans and the study of development. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 29(1): 81-105. (Pubitemid 128676944)
24. de Chadarevian, S. (2006) Mice and the reactor: The 'Genetics experiment' in 1950s Britain. Journal of the History of Biology 39(4): 707-735. (Pubitemid 44601106)
25. de Chadarevian, S. and Hopwood, N. (eds.) (2004) Models: The Third Dimension of Science, 1st edn. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26. Coleman, G. (2004) The political agnosticism of free and open source software and the inadvertent politics of contrast. Anthropological Quarterly 77(3): 507-519. (Pubitemid 39374811)
27. Collins, H.M. (1974) The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies 4(2): 165-186.
28. Crane, D. (1972) Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29. Creager, A.N.H., Lunbeck, E. and Wise, M.N. (eds.) (2007) Science Without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30. Cribb, J. and Sari, T. (2010) Open Science: Sharing Knowledge in the Global Century. Colligwood, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
31. Daston, L. (1995) The moral economy of science. Osiris 10(2): 3-24.
32. Daston, L. (2000) Biographies of Scientific Objects, 1st edn. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
33. Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007) Objectivity, 1st edn. New York: Zone Books.
34. Downey, G. (2002) Telegraph Messenger Boys: Labor, Technology, and Geography, 1850-1950. New York: Routledge.
35. Galison, P. and Hevly, B. (1992) Big Science: The Growth of Large Scale Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36. Griesemer, J. (2006) Theoretical integration, cooperation, and theories as tracking devices. Biological Theory 1(1): 4-7.
37. Griesemer, J.R. (1990) Material models in biology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 79-93.
38. Griesemer, J.R. and Wade, M.J. (1988) Laboratory models, causal explanation and group selection. Biology and Philosophy 3(1): 67-96.
39. Hogan, A. (2009) The CVS newsletter and its 'Invisible colleges': Artifacts of an informal communication network as a historical resource. Paper presented at the Joint Atlantic Seminar for the History of Biology (Manuscript, on file with author
40. Hope, J. (2008) Biobazaar: The Open Source Revolution and Biotechnology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Hyde, L. (2010) Common as Air: Revolution, Art, and Ownership, 1st edn. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.
42. Kass, L.B. and Bonneuil, C. (2004) Mapping and seeing: Barbara McClintock and the linking of genetics and cytology in maize genetics, 1928-1935. In: H.-J. Rheinberger and J.-P. Gaudilliére (eds.) Classical Genetic Research and Its Legacy. The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth-Century Genetics. London: Routledge, pp. 91-118.
43. Keating, P. and Cambrosio, A. (2003) Biomedical Platforms: Realigning the Normal and the Pathological in late-Twentieth-Century Medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Keller, E.F. (2009) What does synthetic biology have to do with biology? BioSocieties 4(2-3): 291-302.
45. Kelty, C.M. (2008) Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
46. Kohler, R.E. (1994) Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Korovchinsky, N.M. (1997) On the history of studies on cladoceran taxonomy and morphology, with emphasis on early work and causes of insufficient knowledge of the diversity of the group. Hydrobiologia 360(1): 1-11.
48. Krebs, H.A. (1975) The August Krogh principle: 'For many problems there is an animal on which it can be most conveniently studied'. Journal of Experimental Zoology 194(1): 221-226.
49. Krogh, A. (1929) The progress of physiology. The American Journal of Physiology 90(2): 243-251.
50. Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51. Latour, B. (1986) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Leonelli, S. (2007) Arabidopsis, the botanical Drosophila: From mouse cress to model organism. Endeavour 31(1): 34-38. (Pubitemid 46415763)
53. Leonelli, S. (2008a) Bio-ontologies as tools for integration in biology. Biological Theory 3(1): 7-11.
54. Leonelli, S. (2008b) Performing abstraction: Two ways of modelling Arabidopsis thaliana. Biology and Philosophy 23(4): 509-528.
55. Lessig, L. (2008) Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: Penguin Press.
56. Levins, R. (1966) The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist 54(4): 421-431.
57. Levy, S. (1984) Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution, 1st edn. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
58. Lievrouw, L.A. (1989) The invisible college reconsidered: Bibliometrics and the development of scientific communication theory. Communication Research 16(5): 615-628.
59. Morange, M. (2009) Synthetic biology: A bridge between functional and evolutionary biology. Biological Theory 4(4): 368-377.
60. Morgan, M.S. and Morrison, M. (eds.) (1999) Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61. Mullins, N.C. (1968) The distribution of social and cultural properties in informal communication networks among biological scientists. American Sociological Review 33(5): 786-797.
62. Mullins, N.C. (1972) The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva 10(1): 51-82.
63. Murray, F. (2010) The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. The American Journal of Sociology 116(2): 341-388.
64. Murray, F., Aghion, P., Dewatrapont, M., Kolev, J. and Stern, S. (2008) Of mice and Academics: The Role of Openness in Science. MIT Sloan Working Paper, http://fmurray.scripts.mit.edu/docs/MADKS-Draft-11.05.2008.pdf, accessed 23 March 2012.
65. Murray, F. and O'Mahony, S. (2007) Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: Implications for organization science. Organization Science 18(6): 1006-1021.
66. Nielson, M. (2012) Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67. O'Malley, M.A., Powell, A., Davies, J.F. and Calvert, J. (2008) Knowledge-making distinctions in synthetic biology. BioEssay: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology 30(1): 57-65.
68. Pottage, A. (2006) Too much ownership: Bio-prospecting in the age of synthetic biology. BioSocieties 1(2): 137-158.
69. Price, D.J.de S. (1963) Little Science, Big Science. New York and London: Columbia University Press.
70. Rabinow, P. (1997) Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
71. Rabinow, P. and Bennett, G. (2012) Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72. Rader, K.A. (1998) 'The Mouse people': Murine genetics work at the Bussey institution, 1909-1936. Journal of the History of Biology 31(3): 327-354. (Pubitemid 128517253)
73. Rader, K.A. (2004) Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900-1955. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press
74. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Rai, A. (1999) Regulating scientific research: Intellectual property rights and the norms of science. Northwestern University Law Review 94(1): 77-152.
75. Rai, A. and Boyle, J. (2007) Synthetic biology: Caught between property rights, the public domain, and the commons. PLoS biology 5(3): e58.
76. Raymond, E. (1999) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly and Associates.
77. Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997) Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, 1st edn. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
78. Schaffer, S. (1992) Late Victorian metrology and its institutionalisation: A manufactory of Ohms. In: R. Bud, and S.E. Cozzens, and R.F. Potter, Bellingham (eds.) Invisible Connections: Instruments, Institutions and Science. Washington DC: SPIE Optical Engineering Press, pp. 23-56.
79. Scott, J.C. (1976) The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
80. Shapin, S. (1996) The Scientific Revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
81. Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82. Shirky, C. (2008) Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organising Without Organisations. London: Allen Lane.
83. Shirky, C. (2010) Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. New York: Penguin Press.
84. Star, S.L. and Ruhleder, K. (1994) Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Chapel Hill, NC: ACM, pp. 253-264.
85. Strange, K. (2007) Revisiting the Krogh Principle in the post-genome era: Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system for integrative physiology research. Journal of Experimental Biology 210(9): 1622-1631. (Pubitemid 46841968)
86. Strasser, B. (2011) The experimenter's museum: GenBank, natural history, and the moral economies of biomedicine. Isis 102(1): 60-96.
87. Thompson, E.P. (1971) The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past and Present 50: 76-136.
88. Uhlir, P.F. and Esanu, J. (2003) The role of scientific and technical data and information in the public domain: Proceedings of a symposium. National Research Council (US), Steering Committee on the Role of Scientific and Technical Data and Information in the Public Domain. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
89. Uhlir, P.F. and Esanu, J. (2004) Open Access and the Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science: Proceedings of an International Symposium. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
90. Varmus, H. (2009) The Art and Politics of Science. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.
91. Waldrop, M. (2008) Science 2.0. Scientific American Magazine 298(5): 68-73.
92. Wise, N.M. (ed.) (1995) The Values of Precision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.