A novel technique for spike detection in extracellular neurophysiological recordings using Cepstrum of Bispectrum

European Signal Processing Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Shahid, Shahjahan ^a   Smith, Leslie S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIALS; BISPECTRUM; CEPSTRUM; EXTRACELLULAR; EXTRACELLULAR SIGNALS; FALSE POSITIVE; INVERSE FILTERS; NEURAL SYSTEMS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL RECORDINGS; NOVEL TECHNIQUES; SPIKE DETECTION;

ALGORITHMS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; NEURONS; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

SIGNAL DETECTION;

EID: 84863738041     PISSN: 22195491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. H. Bergman and M.R. DeLong. A personal computerbased spike detector and sorter: implementation and evaluation. J. Neurosci Methods, 41:187-197, 1992.
2. S.M. Bierer and D.J. Anderson. Multichannel spike detection and sorting using an array processing technique. Neurocomputing, 26-27:947-956, 1999.
3. T. Borghi, R. Gusmerol, A. S. Spinelli, and G. Baranauskas. A simple method for efficient spike detection in multiunit recordings. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 163(1):176-180, 2007.
4. R. Chandra and L.M. Optican. Detection, classification, and superposition resolution of action potentials in multiunit single-channelecordings by an on-line real-time neural network. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 44:403-412, 1997.
5. R.C. Gonzalez and P. Wintz. Digital image processing. Addison-Wesley, second edition, 1987.
6. E.V. Goodall and K.W. Horch. Separation of action potentials in multiunit intrafascicular recordings. IEEE Trans Biomedical Engineering, 39(3):289-295., 1992.
7. H. Kaneko, S.S. Suzuki, J. Okada, and M. Akamatsu. Multineuronal spike classification based on multisite electrode recording, whole-waveform analysis, and hierarchical clustering. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 46(3):280-290, 1999.
8. K.H. Kim and S.J. Kim. Neural spike sorting under nearly 0-db signal-to-noise ratio using nonlinear energy operator and artificial neural-network classifier. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 47(10):1406-1411, 2000.
9. N. Mtetwa and L. S. Smith. Smoothing and thresholding in neuronal spike detection. Neurocomputing, 69(10-12):1366-1370, 2006.
10. Z. Nenadic and J.W. Burdick. Spike detection using continuous wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 52(1):74-87, 2005.
11. I. Obeid and P.D. Wolf. Evaluation of spike detection algorithms for a brain-machine interface application. IEEE Trans biomed eng, 51(6):905-911, 2004.
12. C.F Olson. Maximum-likelihood image matching. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(6):853-857, 2002.
13. E. M. Schmidt. Computer separation of multi-unit neuroelectric data: a review. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 12(2):95-111, 1984.
14. S. Shahid and J. Walker. Cepstrum of bispectrum: a new approach to blind system reconstruction. Signal Processing, 88(1):19-32, 2008.
15. L. S. Smith and N. Mtetwa. A tool for synthesizing spike trains with realistic interference. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 159(1):170-180, 2007.
16. L.S. Smith, S. Shahid, A. Vernier, and N. Mtetwa. Finding events in noisy signals. In Proc. of Irish Signals and Systems Conference, pages 31-35, 2007.
17. G. Xu, J.Wang, Q. Zhang, S. Zhang, and J Zhu. A spike detection method in eeg based on improved morphological filter. Computers in Biology and Medicine, Volume 37, Issue 11, November 2007, Pages 1647-1652, 37(11):1647-1652, 2007.