Array comparative genomic hybridization: Its role in preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 203-209

  Fiorentino, Francesco ^a  

^a GENOMA Molecular Genetics Laboratory   (Italy)

Author keywords

aneuploidy; array comparative genomic hybridization; comprehensive chromosome screening; preimplantation genetic screening

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARRAY COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; BIRTH RATE; BLASTOCYST; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WHOLE GENOME AMPLIFICATION;

ANEUPLOIDY; BLASTOCYST; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84863726611     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: 1473656X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328355854d     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Ebner T, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Tews G. Selection based on morphological assessment of oocytes and embryos at different stages of preimplantation development: a review. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9:251-262.
2. Marquez C, Sandalinas M, Bahçe M, et al. Chromosome abnormalities in 1255 cleavage-stage human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2000; 1:17-26.
3. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, et al. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril 2011; 95:520-524.
4. Lathi RB, Westphal MD, Milki AA. Aneuploidy in the miscarriages of infertile women and the potential benefit of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 2008; 89:353-357.
5. Hassold T, Hall H, Hunt P. The origin of human aneuploidy: where we have been, where we are going. Hum Mol Genet 2007; 16:R203-208.
6. Munne S, Wells D, Cohen J. Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:408-430.
7. Wilton L. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in early human embryos: a review. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22:512-518.
8. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17:454-466.
9. Vanneste E, Voet T, Melotte C, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:2679-2682.
10. Harper J, Coonen E, De Rycke M, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium steering committee. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:821-823.
11. Harper JC, Harton G. The use of arrays in PGD/PGS. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:1173-1177.
12. Wells D, Alfarawati S, Fragouli E. Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH. Mol Hum Reprod 2008; 14:703-710.
13. Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:1925-1935.
14. Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sánchez-García J, et al. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 2011; 95:953-958.
15. Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, et al. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:2017-2021.
16. Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24 h protocol. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:1066-1075.
17. Treff NR, Levy B, Su J, et al. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16:583-589.
18. Scott RT Jr, Ferry K, Su J, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril 2012; 97:870-875.
19. Northrop LE, Treff NR, Levy B, Scott RT Jr. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16:590-600.
20. Forman EJ, Tao X, Ferry KM, et al. Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates. Hum Reprod 2012; 27:1217-1222.
21. Fragouli E, Katz-Jaffe M, Alfarawati S, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening of polar bodies and blastocysts from couples experiencing repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:875-887.
22. Fragouli E, Lenzi M, Ross R, et al. Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:2596-2608.
23. Schoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, et al. Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:1700-1706.
24. Delhanty JD. Is the polar body approach best for preimplantation genetic screening? Placenta 2011; 32 (Suppl 3):S268-S270.
25. De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21:767-780.
26. Biricik A, Fiorentino F, Kokkali G, et al. Mosaicism does not affect accuracy of 24 chromosomes preimplantation genetic screening on cleavage stage embryos [abstract 111]. In: Abstracts presented at the 12th International Congress of Human Genetics/61st Annual Meeting of The American Society of Human Genetics; 12 October 2011; Montreal, Canada.
27. Geraedts J, Collins J, Gianaroli L, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Hum Reprod 2010; 25:575-577.
28. Geraedts J, Montag M, Magli MC, et al. Polar body arrayCGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:3173-3180.
29. Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C, et al. Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF? Fertil Steril 2010; 93:1006e7-1006e10.
30. Fishel S, Craig A, Lynch C, et al. Assessment of 19 803 paired chromosomes and clinical outcome from first 150 cycles using array CGH of the first polar body for embryo selection and transfer. J Fertiliz In Vitro 2011; 1:1-8.
31. Scott RT Jr, Treff NR, Stevens J, et al. Delivery of a chromosomally normal child from an oocyte with reciprocal aneuploid polar bodies. J Assist Reprod Genet (in press).
32. Schoolcraft WB, Treff NR, Stevens JM, et al. Live birth outcome with trophectoderm biopsy, blastocyst vitrification, and single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based comprehensive chromosome screening in infertile patients. Fertil Steril 2011; 96:638-640.
33. Johnson DS, Cinnioglu C, Ross R, et al. Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16:944-949.
34. Van Steirteghem A. What next for assisted reproductive technology? A plea for an evidence-based approach. Hum Reprod 2008; 12:2615-2616.
35. Scriven PN, Ogilvie CM, Khalaf Y. Embryo selection in IVF: is polar body array comparative genomic hybridization accurate enough? Hum Reprod 2012; 27:951-953.
36. Mastenbroek S, van der Veen F, Aflatoonian A, et al. Embryo selection in IVF. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:964-966.
37. Wikland M, Hardarson T, Hillensjo T, et al. Obstetric outcomes after transfer of vitrified blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:1699-1707.
38. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D. First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:1560-1574.
39. Treff NR, Northrop LE, Kasabwala K, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Fertil Steril 2011; 95:1606-1612.