Online evaluation programs: Benefits and limitations

Journal of Cancer Education

Volumn 27, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Burhansstipanov, Linda ^a   Clark, Richard E ^a   Watanabe Galloway, Shinobu ^b   Petereit, Daniel G ^c   Eschiti, Valerie ^d   Krebs, Linda U ^e   Pingatore, Noel L ^f  

^a Native American Cancer Research   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c RAPID CITY REGIONAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^f Inter Tribal Council of Michigan Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

American indian; Benefits; Cancer; Evaluation; Limitations; Native american; Navigation

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; ESKIMO; ETHNOLOGY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT CARE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ALASKA; HUMANS; INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN; INTERNET; INUITS; NEOPLASMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PATIENT CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84863724021     PISSN: 08858195     EISSN: 15430154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13187-012-0320-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Segal-Matsunaga D, Enos R, Gotay CC, Banner RO, DeCambra H, Hammond OW, Hedlund N, Ilaban EK, Issell BF, Tsark JU (1996) Participatory research in a native Hawaiian community: theWai'anae Cancer Research Project. Cancer 78(7):1582-1586, Supplement.
2. Buransstipanov L (1994) Documentation of the cancer research needs of American Indians and Alaska natives (SuDoc HE 20.3162/4:1). Rockville, MD: Cancer Control Science Program, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute.
3. Banner RO, DeCambra H, Enos R, Gotay CC, Hammond OW, Hedlund N et al (1995) A breast and cervical cancer project in a Native Hawaiian community: Waíanae Cancer Research Project. Prev Med 22:447-453.
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1999) Native outreach: a report to American Indian, Alaska native and native Hawaiian communities (SuDoc HE 20.3152:N 21/4). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute.
5. Burhansstipanov L, Bad Wound D, Capelouto N, Goldfarb F, Harjo L, Hatathlie L, Vigil G, White M (1998) Culturally relevant "navigator" patient support: the native sisters. Cancer Pract 6 (3):191-194.
6. Burhansstipanov L, Dignan MB, Bad Wound D, Tenney M, Vigil G (2000) Native American recruitment into breast cancer screening: the NAWWA project. J Cancer Educ 15:29-33.
7. Burhansstipanov L (1999) Native American community-based cancer projects: theory versus reality. Cancer Control 6(6):620-626.
8. Dignan MB, Burhansstipanov L, Hariton J, Harjo L, Rattler T, Lee R, Mason M (2005) A comparison of two Native American Navigator formats: face-to-face and telephone. Cancer Control 12 (Suppl 2):28-33.
9. Burhansstipanov L, Dignan MB, Schumacher A, Krebs LU, Alfonsi G, Apodaca C (2010) Breast screening navigator programs within three settings that assist underserved women. J Cancer Ed 25(2):247-252
10. Burhansstipanov L, Krebs LU, Seals BF, Watanabe-Galloway S, Pingatore N, Petereit D (2011) "Lessons Learned from the Native Navigators and the Cancer Continuum" (NNACC) [PI: Burhansstipanov, R24MD002811] submitted JCE winter.
11. Burhansstipanov L, Krebs LU, Seals BF, Bradley AA, Kaur JS, Iron P, Dignan MB, Thiel C, Gamito E (2010) Native American breast cancer survivors' physical conditions and quality of life. Cancer 116(6):1560-1571.
12. Burhansstipanov L, Krebs LU, Seals BF, Watanabe-Galloway S, Petereit DG, Pingatore NL, Eschiti V (2012) Preliminary lessons learned from the "Native Navigators and the Cancer Continuum" (NNACC). J Cancer Ed. doi:10.1007/s13187-012-0316-5.