Semi-dynamic traffic assignment model with mode and route choices under stochastic travel times

Journal of Advanced Transportation

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 269-281

  Nakayama, Sho Ichiro ^a   Takayama, Jun Ichi ^a   Nakai, Junya ^a   Nagao, Kazuki ^b  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Airport Department Infrastructure and Industrial Development Division Oriental Consultants Global Co   (Japan)

Author keywords

mode choice; non linear complementarity problem; route choice; semi dynamic traffic assignment model; stochastic travel times

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARITY PROBLEMS; MODE CHOICE; ROUTE CHOICE; STOCHASTIC TRAVEL TIMES; TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT MODELS;

AUTOMOBILES; DYNAMICS; MASS TRANSPORTATION; RAILROADS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES; TRAVEL TIME; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 84863717230     PISSN: 01976729     EISSN: 20423195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/atr.208     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Fujita M, Matsui M, Mizokami S,. Modelling of the time-of-day traffic assignment over a traffic network. Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Management 1988; 389: 111-119 (in Japanese).
2. Fujita M, Yamamoto K, Matsui M,. Modelling of the time-of-day assignment over a congested network. Proceedings of Japan Society of Civil Engineers 1989; 407: 129-138 (in Japanese).
3. Miyagi T, Makimura K,. A study on semi-dynamic traffic assignment method. Traffic Engineering 1991; 26: 17-28 (in Japanese).
4. Akamatsu T, Makino Y, Takahashi E,. Semi-dynamic traffic assignment models with queue evolution and elastic OD demand. Infrastructure Planning Review 1998; 15: 535-545 (in Japanese).
5. Safwat KN, Magnanti TL,. A combined trip generation, trip distribution, modal split, and trip assignment model. Transportation Science 1988; 18: 14-30.
6. Fernandez E, Joaquin DC, Florian M, Cabrera EE,. Network equilibrium models with combined modes. Transportation Science 1994; 28: 182-192.
7. Ujii Y, Fujita M, Matsumoto Y, Matsui H,. Development of time-of-day user equilibrium traffic assignment model considering toll load in expressways. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 2003; 5: 1621-1634.
8. Mirchandani P, Soroush H,. Generalized traffic equilibrium with probabilistic travel times and perceptions. Transportation Science 1987; 21: 133-152.
9. Watling D,. A second order stochastic network equilibrium model, I: theoretical foundation. Transportation Science 2002; 36: 149-166.
10. Lo HK, Tung YK,. Network with degradable links: capacity analysis and design. Transportation Research 2003; 37B: 345-363.
11. Lo HK, Luo XW, Siu BWY,. Degradable transport network: travel time budget of travelers with heterogeneous risk aversion. Transportation Research 2006; 40B: 792-806.
12. Watling D,. User equilibrium traffic network assignment with stochastic travel times and late arrival penalty. European Journal of Operational Research 2006; 175: 1539-1556.
13. Nakayama S,. A stochastic user equilibrium model with stochastic demand, In Mathematics in Transport, Heydecker B, (ed)., Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2007; 211-218.
14. Lam WHK, Shao H, Sumalee A,. Modeling impacts of adverse weather conditions on a road network with uncertainties in demand and supply. Transportation Research 2008; 42B: 792-806.
15. Kawakami S, Takada A,. Evaluation of mass transit frequencies and pricing policies in urban transportation system. Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Management 1990; 431: 77-86 (in Japanese).
16. Dafermos SC,. Relaxation algorithms for the general asymmetric traffic equilibrium problem. Transportation Science 1982; 16: 231-240.
17. Nakayama S, K, Tokoro T,. Stochastic network equilibrium models for road network and their effect analysis for providing traffic information. Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Management 2006; 62: 526-536 (in Japanese).
18. Papoulis A,. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, McGraw-Hill: New York, 1965.