Community structure analysis of methanogens associated with rumen protozoa reveals bias in universal archaeal primers

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 4051-4056

  Tymensen, Lisa D ^a   McAllister, Tim A ^a  

^a AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEAL; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; PRIMER SETS; RRNA GENES; RUMEN PROTOZOA; SPECIES COMPOSITION;

GENES; PROTOZOA; RNA;

METHANOGENS;

PRIMER DNA; RIBOSOME RNA;

BACTERIUM; CATTLE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; METHANOGENESIS; PROTOZOAN; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMAL; ARCHAEON; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHANOBREVIBACTER; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PARASITOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; RUMINANT STOMACH; THERMOPLASMA;

ANIMALS; ARCHAEA; CATTLE; DNA PRIMERS; ECOSYSTEM; METHANOBREVIBACTER; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; RUMEN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; THERMOPLASMA;

ARCHAEA; BOS; METHANOBREVIBACTER; PROTOZOA; THERMOPLASMA;

EID: 84863697442     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.07994-11     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cadillo-Quiroz H, Yashiro E, Yavitt JB, Zinder SH. 2008. Characterization of the archaeal community in a minerotrophic fen and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism-directed isolation of a novel hydrogenotrophic methanogen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:2059 -2068.
2. Chagan I, Tokura M, Jouany JP, Ushida K. 1999. Detection of methanogenic archaea associated with rumen ciliate protozoa. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 45:305-308.
3. DeLong EF. 1992. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:5685-5689.
4. Finlay BJ, et al. 1994. Some rumen ciliates have endosymbiotic methanogens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 117:157-161.
5. Finlay BJ, Fenchel T. 1989. Hydrogenosomes in some anaerobic protozoa resembling mitochondria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 65:187-190.
6. Gu MJ, et al. 2011. Analysis of methanogenic archaeal communities of rumen fluid and rumen particles from Korean black goats. Anim. Sci. J. 82:663- 672. doi:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00890.x.
7. Hegarty RS. 1999. Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50:1321-1327.
8. Huber T, Faulkner G, Hugenholtz P. 2004. Bellerophon: a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 20:2317-2319.
9. Irbis C, Ushida K. 2004. Detection of methanogens and proteobacteria from a single cell of rumen ciliate protozoa. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 50: 203-212.
10. Janssen PH, Kirs M. 2008. Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:3619 -3625.
11. King EE, Smith RP, St-Pierre B, Wright AD. 2011. Differences in the rumen methanogen populations of lactating Jersey and Holstein dairy cows under the same diet regimen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:5682- 5687.
12. Regensbogenova M, et al. 2004. A re-appraisal of the diversity of the methanogens associated with the rumen ciliates. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 238:307-313.
13. Schloss PD, Larget BR, Handelsman J. 2004. Integration of microbial ecology and statistics: a test to compare gene libraries. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:5485-5492.
14. Schloss PD, et al. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platformindependent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7537-7541.
15. Shin EC, et al. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of archaea in three fractions of cow rumen based on the 16S rDNA sequence. Anaerobe 10:313-319.
16. Skillman LC, Evans PN, Strompl C, Joblin KN. 2006. 16S rDNA directed PCR primers and detection of methanogens in the bovine rumen. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 42:222-228.
17. Tajima K, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M, Aminov RI. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of archaeal 16S rRNA libraries from the rumen suggests the existence of a novel group of archaea not associated with known methanogens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 200:67-72.
18. Tamura, K, et al. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731-2739.
19. Tan HY, et al. 2011. Diversity of bovine rumen methanogens in vitro in the presence of condensed tannins, as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rRNA gene library. J. Microbiol. 49:492- 498.
20. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673- 4680.
21. Tokura M, Chagan I, Ushida K, Kojima Y. 1999. Phylogenetic study of methanogens associated with rumen ciliates. Curr. Microbiol. 39:123- 128.
22. Watanabe T, Asakawa S, Nakamura A, Nagaoka K, Kimura M. 2004. DGGE method for analyzing 16S rDNA of methanogenic archaeal community in paddy field soil. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 232:153-163.
23. Whitehead TR, Cotta MA. 1999. Phylogenetic diversity of methanogenic archaea in swine waste storage pits. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 179:223-226.
24. Whitford MF, Teather RM, Forster RJ. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen. BMC Microbiol. 1:5.
25. Wright AD, Pimm C. 2003. Improved strategy for presumptive identification of methanogens using 16S riboprinting. J. Microbiol. Methods 55: 337-349.
26. Wright AD, Auckland CH, Lynn DH. 2007. Molecular diversity of methanogens in feedlot cattle from Ontario and Prince Edward Island, Canada. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:4206-4210.
27. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. 2000. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J. Comput. Biol. 7:203-214.