A utilization-focused approach to contribution analysis

Evaluation

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 364-377

  Patton, Michael Quinn ^a  

^a Utilization Focused Evaluation   (United States)

Author keywords

contribution analysis; utilization focused evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863671226     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389012449523     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bonnet D,Ranney J,Snow J,Coplen M,Patton MQCambridge, MA: John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center; 2009:.
2. Funnell SC,Rogers PJPurposeful Program Theory: Making Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2011:.
3. Mayne J.Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: using performance measures sensibly.Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 2001;16 (1): 1-24.
4. Mayne JContribution Analysis: An Approach to Exploring Cause and Effect. Rome: The Institutional Learning and Change Initiative; 2008:.
5. Mayne JEvaluating the Complex. Schwartz RForss KMarra M, ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 2011:53-96.
6. Patton MQ.Advocacy impact evaluation.Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation. 2008;5 (9): 1-10.
7. Patton MQDevelopmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Guilford; 2011:.
8. Patton MQEssentials of Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2012:.
9. PattonMGornickJ (2011) Evaluation of the Phase 2 Evaluation of the Paris Declaration. Copenhagen. URL: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/29/48461537.pdf.
10. Switching Operations Fatality Analysis. Washington, DC: SOFA Working Group; 2010:.
11. SternED with Altinger L, Feinstein O, Marañón M, Ruegenberg D, Schulz N and Nielsen NS (2008) Thematic Study on The Paris Declaration, Aid Effectiveness and Development Effectiveness. Madrid: DaRa Development Assistance Research Associates and Copenhagen: Ministry of Foreign Affairs. URL: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/28/41807824.pdf.
12. Wilson-GrauRBrittH (2012) Outcome Harvestingw,2012. New York: Ford Foundation. URL: http://www.fordfoundation.org.
13. WoodBBettsJEttaFGayferJKabellDNgwiraNSagastiFSamaranayakeM (2011) The Evaluation of the Paris Declaration, Final Report. Copenhagen: OECD. URL: http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,3746,en_21571361_34047972_38242748_1_1_1_1,00.html.
14. WoodsDD (2007) Revealing Analytical Rigor: A Strategy for Creating Insight into the Information Analysis Process. URL: http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Paper/13513837.aspx.
15. ZelikDPattersonESWoodsDD (2007) Understanding Rigor in Information Analysis.URL: http://csel.eng.ohio-state.edu/zelik/research/Rigor_files/ZelikPattersonWoods_UnderstandingRigor_1.pdf.