Making contribution analysis work: A practical framework for handling influencing factors and alternative explanations

Evaluation

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 294-309

  Lemire, Sebastian T ^a   Nielsen, Steffen Bohni ^a   Dybdal, Line ^a  

^a RAMBOLL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

alternative explanation; contribution analysis; influencing; mechanism; theory based evaluation factor

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863669728     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389012450654     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Astbury B,Leeuw F.Unpacking black boxes: mechanisms and theory building in evaluation.American Journal of Evaluation.2010;31 (3): 363-81.
2. Coffman J.Broadening the perspective on scale.Evaluation Exchange.2010;XV (1): 2-3.
3. Durlak J,DuPre E.Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.American Journal of Community Psychology.2008;41:327-50.
4. Dusenbury L,Brannigan R,Falco M,Hansen W.A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings.Health Education Research.2003;18 (2): 237-56.
5. Dybdal L,Nielsen SB,Lemire S.Contribution analysis applied: reflections on scope and methodology.Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation.2010;25 (2): 29-57.
6. Ewalt JAG,Jennings ET.Administration, governance, and policy tools in welfare administration.Public Administration Review.2004;64:449-62.
7. Fixsen D,Naoom SL,Blase KA,Friedman RM,Wallace FImplementation Research.A Synthesis of the Literature.Tampa, FL: University of South Florida; 2005.
8. Grover V.An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems.Decision Sciences.1993;24 (3): 603-40.
9. Hedström P,Swedberg R.Social mechanisms.Acta Sociologica.1996;39:281-308.
10. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory.Hedström PSwedberg R, ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
11. Hill CJ.Casework job design and client outcomes in welfare-to-work offices.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.2006;16:263-88.
12. Keiser LR,Soss J.With good cause: bureaucratic discretion and the politics of child support enforcement.American Journal of Political Science.1998;42:1133-56.
13. Langbein LI.Ownership, empowerment, and productivity: some empirical evidence on the causes and consequences of employee discretion.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.2000;19:427-49.
14. Lipsky MStreet-Level Bureaucrats: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services.New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1980.
15. MayneJ (1999) Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: using performance measures sensibly.Discussion paper.Office of the Auditor General of Canada.URL: http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/FA3-31-1999E.pdf.
16. Mayne J.Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: using performance measures sensibly.Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation.2001;16 (1): 1-24.
17. MayneJ (2008) Contribution analysis: an approach to exploring cause and effect.ILAC Brief 16, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative, Rome, Italy.URL: http://www.inteval-group.org/IMG/pdf/ILAC_Contribution_Analysis-2.pdf.
18. MayneJ (2009) Improving HRSDC evaluations of G&C Program: using theory-based approaches.Unpublished manuscript.
19. Mayne JEvaluating the Complex.Attribution, Contribution and Beyond.Schwartz RForss KMarra M, ed.New York: Transaction Publishers; 2011.
20. Mayntz R.Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena.Philosophy of the Social Sciences.2004;34:237-59.
21. Pawson R.Evidence-based policy: the promise of 'realist synthesis'.Evaluation.2002;8 (3): 340-58.
22. Pawson R,Tilley NRealistic Evaluation.London: SAGE; 1997.
23. PawsonRGreenhalghTHarveyG (2004) Realist synthesis: an introduction.ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester RMP Methods Paper 2/2004, pp.7-8.URL (consulted May 2011): http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/publications/documents/RMPmethods2.pdf.
24. Riccucci NM,Meyers MK,Lurie I,Han JS.The implementation of welfare reform policy: the role of public managers in front-line practices.Public Administrative Review.2004;64:438-48.
25. Rogers EMDiffusion of Innovations.New York: Free Press; 2003.
26. Trochim WMK.Pattern matching, validity, and conceptualization in program evaluation.Evaluation Review.1985;9 (5): 575-604.
27. Van Evera SGuide to Methods for Students of Political Science.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1997.
28. Weiss CH.Theory-based evaluation: past, present, and future.New Directions for Evaluation.1997;76:41-55.
29. Winter S.Political control, street-level bureaucrats and information asymmetry in regulatory and social policies.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Policy Analysis and Management held in Washington, DC; 2003; 2003.
30. Winter SHandbook of Public Policy.Peters BGPierre J, ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2006:151-66.
31. Yin RKCase Study Research.Design and Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003s.