Supporting return-to-work in the face of legislation: Stakeholders' experiences with return-to-work after breast cancer in Belgium

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 241-251

  Tiedtke, Corine ^a   Donceel, Peter ^a   Knops, Lieve ^b   Désiron, Huget ^a,c   De Casterlé, Bernadette Dierckx ^a   De Rijk, Angelique ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Vrij Centrum voor Leerlingenbegeleiding (VCLB)   (Belgium)

^c PHL University College   (Belgium)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Experiences; Qualitative; Return to work; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; BREAST TUMOR; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL LEAVE; MOTIVATION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SURVIVOR; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION; WORK;

ADULT; BELGIUM; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MOTIVATION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL; SICK LEAVE; SURVIVORS; WORK;

EID: 84863631868     PISSN: 10530487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-011-9342-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Vingård E, Alexanderson K, Norlund A. Consequences of being at sick leave. Scand J Public Health. 2004;563:207-15.
2. Van Oostrom SH, Driessen MT, De Vet HC, Franche RL, Schonstein E, Loisel P, et al. Workplace interventions of preventing work disability. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;15:2. CD006955.
3. Tiedtke C, De Rijk A, de Casterlé BD, Christiaens MR, Donceel P. Experiences and concerns about returning to work for women breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Psycho-Oncology. 2010;19:677-83.
4. Tiedtke C, de Casterlé BD, De Rijk A, Christiaens MR, Donceel P. Breast cancer treatment and work disability: patient perspectives. The Breast. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2011.06.002.
5. Franche RL, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:525-42. (Pubitemid 41563573)
6. Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, Anema JR, Van Poppel MN. Return to work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4). doi:10.1007/s10926-005- 8033-0. (Pubitemid 41563574)
7. Mortelmans AK, Donceel P, Lahaye D. Disability management through positive intervention in stakeholders' information asymmetry. A pilot study. Occup Med. 2006;56:129-36. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqj014.
8. Gobelet C, Luthi F, Al-khodairy AT, Chamberlain MA. Vocational rehabilitation: a multidisciplinary intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1405-10. (Pubitemid 47342887)
9. Shaw W, Hong Q, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:2-15. doi:10.1007/s10926-007-9115-y.
10. Maiwald K, De Rijk A, Guzman J, Schonstein E, Yassi, A. Evaluation of a workplace disability prevention intervention in Canada: examining differing perceptions of stakeholders. J Occup Rehabil. 2010. doi:10.1007/s10926-010-9267- z.
11. Van Raak A, De Rijk A, Morsa J. Applying new institutional theory: the case of collaboration to promote work resumption after sickness absence. Work Employ Soc. 2005;19:141.
12. De Rijk A, Van Raak A, Van der Made J. A new theoretical model for cooperation in public health settings: the RDIC model. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:1103.
13. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers, a synthesis of findings across OECD countries. OECD report. France; 2010.
14. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77-101.
15. Brunarski D, Shaw L, Doupe L. Moving toward virtual interdisciplinary teams and a multi-stakeholder approach in community-based return to work care. Work. 2008;30:329-36. (Pubitemid 351761657)
16. Larsson A, Gard G. How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers' perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:169-81. (Pubitemid 37081762)
17. MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R-L, Irvin E. The workplace based return to work literature review group. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:257-69. (Pubitemid 44336252)
18. MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Kosny A, Chambers L. A deliberation on 'hurt versus harm' logic in early-return-to-work policy. Policy Pract Health Saf. 2007;5:75-96.
19. Williams R, Westmorland M. Perspectives on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work. 2002;19:87-93. (Pubitemid 35276838)
20. Rosenthal D, Hursh N, Lui J, Isom R, Sasson J. A survey of current disability management practice: emerging trends and implications for certification. RCB. 2007;50:76-86.
21. Pransky GS, Shaw WS, Franche RL, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers-current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:625-34. (Pubitemid 38878390)
22. Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, van Rhenen W, Groothof JW, van der Klink JJ, Bültmann U. Trends in return to work of breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;128:237-42.
23. Tjulin A, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:311-21.
24. Høgelund J. Reintegration: public or private responsibility? Consequences of Dutch and Danish policies toward work-disabled persons. Int J Health Serv. 2002;32:467-87. (Pubitemid 35396536)
25. Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:419-26.