Context-aware semi-local feature detector

ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Ji, Rongrong ^a   Yao, Hongxun ^a   Tian, Qi ^b   Xu, Pengfei ^a   Sun, Xiaoshuai ^a   Liu, Xianming ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b University of Texas at San Antonio   (United States)

Author keywords

Context aware feature; Contextual gaussian field; Image analysis; Internet; Knowledge representation; Learning based feature extraction; Mean shift; Multimedia systems; Semi local feature; Supervised kernel learning

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT-AWARE; GAUSSIAN FIELD; KERNEL LEARNING; MEAN SHIFT; SEMI-LOCAL FEATURE;

FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS;

DETECTORS;

EID: 84863631474     PISSN: 21576904     EISSN: 21576912     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2168752.2168758     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. BELONGIE, S., MALIK, J., AND PUZICHA, J. 2002. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 244, 509-522. (Pubitemid 34448769)
2. BILESCHI, S. AND WOLF, L. 2007. Image representations beyond histograms of gradients: The role of Gestalt descriptors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
3. BROWN, M., SZELISKI, R., AND WINDER, S. 2005. Multi-image matching using multiscale oriented patches. International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
4. BRUCE, D. N. AND TSOTSOS, J. 2006. Saliency based on information maximization. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neuro Imformation Processing Systems.
5. BRUCKSTEIN, A., RIVLIN, E., AND WEISS, I. 1997. Scale space semi-local invariants. Image Vision Comput. 15, 5, 335-344. (Pubitemid 127382220)
6. CHENG, Y. 1995. Mean shift, model seeking, and clustering. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 17, 8, 790-799.
7. COMANICIU, D. AND MEER, P. 2002. Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 5, 603-619. (Pubitemid 34550429)
8. DAUGMAN, J. 1985. Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 2, 7, 1160-1169.
9. FEI-FEI, L., FERGUS, R., AND PERONA, P. 2004. Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Workshop on Generative-Model Based Vision.
10. FUKUNAGA, K. 1990. Statistical Pattern Recognition 2nd Ed., Academic, Boston, MA.
11. GAO, D. AND VASCONCELOS, N. 2005. Discriminant saliency for visual recognition from cluttered scenes. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neutro Information Processing Systems. 481-488.
12. GAZZANIGA, M., IVRY, R., AND MANGUN, G. 2002. The methods of cognitive neuroscience. In Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of Mind.
13. GILBERT, C. AND WIESEL, T. 1983. Clustered intrinsic connections in cat visual cortex for face recognition. J. Neurosci. 3, 1116-1133. (Pubitemid 13135434)
14. HARRIS, C. AND STEPHENS, M. 1988. A combined corner and edge detector. In Proceedings of the Alvey Vision Conference, 147-152.
15. HUA, G., BROWN, M., AND WINDER, S. 2007. Discriminant embedding for local image descriptors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision.
16. HUANG Y., SHEKHAR, S., AND XIONG, H. 2004. Discovering collocation patterns from spatial data sets: A general approach. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16, 12, 1472-1485. (Pubitemid 40010922)
17. HUBEL, D. 1995. Eye, Brain, and Vision. Scientific American Library.
18. HOU, X. AND ZHANG, L. 2007. Saliency detection: A spectral residual approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
19. ITTI, L., KOCH, C., AND NIEBUR, E. 1998. A model for saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 11, 1254-1259. (Pubitemid 128742001)
20. JAMIESON, M., DICKINSON, S., STEVENSON, S., AND WACHSMUTH, S. 2006. Using language to drive the perceptual grouping of local image features. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
21. JEGOU, H., HARZALLAH, H., AND SCHMID, C. 2007. A contextual dissimilarity measure for accurate and efficient image search. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
22. JEGOU, H., SCHMID, C., HARZALLAH, H., AND VERBEEK, J. 2009. Accurate image search using the contextual dissimilarity measure. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., Accepted.
23. KE, Y. AND SUKTHANKAR, R. 2004. PCA-SIFT: A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
24. LAZEBNIK, S. AND PONCE, J. 2005. A sparse texture representation using local affine regions. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 8, 1265-1278. (Pubitemid 41245056)
25. LAZEBNIK, S., SCHMID, C., AND PONCE, J. 2004. Semi-local affine parts for object recognition. In Proceedings of the Britism Machine Vision Conference.
26. LIN, H., SI, J., ABOUSLEMAN, G. P. 2006. Dynamic point selection in image mosaicking. Opt. Engin. 45, 3.
27. LOWE, D. G. 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision. 1150-1157.
28. LOWE, D. G. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision 60, 2, 91-110.
29. MATAS, J., CHUM, O., URBAN, M., AND PAJDLA, T. 2004. Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. Image Vision Comput. 22, 10, 761-767.
30. MIKOLAJCZYK, K. AND SCHMID, C. 2001. Indexing based on scale invariant interest points. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision. 525-531. (Pubitemid 32794998)
31. MIKOLAJCZYK, K. AND SCHMID, C. 2004. Scale and affine invariant interest point detectors. Int. J. Comput. Vision 60, 1, 63-86.
32. MIKOLAJCZYK, K. AND SCHMID, C. 2005. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 10, 1615-1630. (Pubitemid 41555406)
33. MIKOLAJCZYK, K., TUYTELAARS, T., SCHMID, C., ZISSERMAN, A., MATAS, J., SCHAFFALITZKY, F., KADIR, T., AND GOOL, L. V. 2006. A comparison of affine region detectors. Int. J. Comput. Vision 65, 12, 43-72. (Pubitemid 43281159)
34. NI, B. AND YAN, S. 2009. Contextualizing histogram. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
35. NISTER, D. AND STEWENIUS, H. 2006. Scalable recognition with a vocabulary tree. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
36. OLIVA, A. AND TORRALBA, A. 2007. The role of context in object recognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 12, 520-527. (Pubitemid 350181571)
37. PALETTA, L., FRITZ, G., AND SEIFERT, C. 2005. Q-Learning of sequential attention for visual object recognition from informative local descriptors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning.
38. QIU, F. AND HEYDT, R. 2005. Figure and ground in the visual cortex: v2 combines stereoscopic cues with gestalt rules. Neuron 47, 1, 255-166.
39. QUACK, T., FERRARI, V., AND GOOL, L. V. 2007. Efficient mining of frequent and distinctive feature configurations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision.
40. SALTON, G. AND BUCKLEY, C. 1988. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inform. Process. Manag.
41. SERRE, T., WOLF, L., BILESCHI, S., RIESENHUBER, M., AND POGGIO, T. 2006. Robust object recognitio with cortex-like mechanisms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29, 3, 411-426.
42. SHOTTON, J., WINN, J., ROTHER, C., AND CRIMINISI, A. 2006. TextonBoost: Joint appearance, shape an context modeling for multiclass object recognition and segmentation. In Proceedings of the Europea Conference on Computer Vision.
43. SIMON, A. AND WINDER, J. 2007. Learning local image descriptors. In Proceedings of the Internationa Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
44. TORRALBA, A. 2003. Contextual priming for object detection. Int. J. Comput. Vision 53, 2, 169-191.
45. TORRALBA, A. AND OLIVA, A. 2006. Contextual guidance of attention in natural scenes: The role of globa features on object search. Psychol. Rev. 113, 4, 766-786. (Pubitemid 44629917)
46. TORRALBA, A., MURPHY, K. P., AND FREEMAN, W. T. 2005. Contextual models for object detectionuing boosted random fields. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing System 1401-1408.
47. TREUE, S. 2001. Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex. Trends Neurosci. 24, 5, 295-300. (Pubitemid 32304473)
48. WALTHER, D. AND KOCH, C. 2006. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Netw. 19, 1395-1407. (Pubitemid 44708603)
49. WINN, J., CRIMINISI, A., AND MINKA, T. 2005. Object categorization by learned universal visual dictionar In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision.
50. WOLF, L. AND BILESCHI, S. 2006. A critical view of context. Int. J. Comput. Vision 69, 2, 251-261. (Pubitemid 43814120)
51. YUAN, J., WU, Y., AND YANG, M. 2007. Discovery of collocation patterns: From visual words to phrase. I Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
52. ZHANG, H., BERG, A., MAIRE, M., AND MALIK, J. 2006. SVM-KNN: Discriminative nearest neighbor cla sification for visual category recognition. In Proceeidngs of the International Conference on Compute Vision and Pattern Recognition.