The state of systematic reviews in library and information studies

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 91-95

  Koufogiannakis, Denise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863609052     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1715720X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18438/B8Q021     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Ankem, K. (2008). Evaluation of method in systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in LIS. Library and Information Research, 32(101), 91-104. Retrieved 15 May 2012 from http://www.lirgjournal.org.uk/lir/ojs/index.php/lir/article/view/58/118
2. Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(59). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
3. Booth, A. (2000, July 2-5). Librarian heal thyself: Evidence based librarianship, useful, practical, desirable? 8th International Congress on Medical Librarianship. London, UK.
4. Booth, A., & Brice, A. (2004). Appraising the evidence. In A. Booth & A. Brice (Eds.). Evidence-based practice for information professionals: A handbook. (pp. 104-118). London: Facet.
5. Brettle, A. (2009). Systematic reviews and evidence based library and information practice. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 4(1), 43-50. Retrieved 15 May 2012 from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/5082/5082
6. Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A., & Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27-44. doi:10.1177/1468794106058867
7. Eldredge, J. (1997). Evidence-based librarianship: a commentary for Hypothesis. Hypothesis, 11(3), 4-7. Retrieved 15 May 2012 from http://research.mlanet.org/hypothesis/hypo11-3.pdf
8. Eldredge, J. D. (2000a). Evidence-based librarianship: An overview. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 88(4), 289-302. Retrieved 15 May 2012 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC35250/
9. Eldredge, J. D. (2000b). Evidence-based librarianship: Formulating EBL questions. Bibliotheca Medica Canadiana 22(2), 74-77.
10. Eldredge, J. D. (2000c). Evidence-based librarianship: Searching for the needed EBL evidence. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 19(3), 1-18. doi:10.1300/J115v19n03_01
11. Eldredge, J. D. (2004). How good is the evidence base? In A. Booth & A. Brice (Eds.). Evidence-based practice for information professionals: A handbook. (pp. 36-48). London: Facet.
12. Grant, M., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types of associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
13. Koufogiannakis, D., & Crumley, E. (2006). Research in librarianship: Issues to consider. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 324-340. doi:10.1108/07378830610692109
14. Koufogiannakis, D., Slater, L., & Crumley, E. (2004). A content analysis of librarianship research. Journal of Information Science, 30(3), 227-239. doi:10.1177/0165551504044668
15. Urquhart, C. (2010). Systematic reviewing, meta-analysis and meta-synthesis for evidence-based library and information science. Information Research, 15(3), colis708. Retrieved 3 Mar. 2012 from http://InformationR.net/ir/15-3/colis7/colis708.html