Law and aging: Mental health theory approach

Theories on Law and Ageing: The Jurisprudence of Elder Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 121-143

  Schmidt, W C ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863590711     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78954-3_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (102)

1. Alexander G (1977) Who benefits from conservatorship? Trial 13(5):30
2. Alexander G, Lewin T (1972) The aged and the need for surrogate management
3. Appelbaum P, Grisso T (1995) The MacArthur treatment competence study: I. Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment. L Hum Behav 19:105
4. Berger R, Piliavin I (1976) The effect of casework: A research note. Soc Work 21:205
5. Black's Law Dictionary (1979), 5th edn
6. Blackstone W (1783) Commentaries on the laws of England, 9th edn, book 4, chapter 27 (reprinted 1978
7. Blenkner M, Bloom M, Nielson M (1971) A research and demonstration project of protective services. Soc Casework 52:483
8. Blenkner M, Bloom M, Nielson M, Weber R (1974) Final report: Protective services for older people: Findings from the Benjamin Rose Institute Study. Benjamin Rose Institute, Cleveland
9. Brown R (1979) The rights of older persons
10. Chamberlain J (1979) On our own: Patient controlled alternatives to the mental health system
11. Cohen E (1967) Old age and the law. Women's L J 53:96
12. Cohen E (1978) Protective services and public guardianship: A dissenting view. 31st annual meeting of the gerontological society, Dallas, TX, 20 November 1978
13. Cohen P (2001) Being reasonable: Defining and implementing a right to community-based care for older adults with mental disabilities under the Americans with disabilities act. Int J L Psychiatry 24:233
14. Conrad P (2005) The shifting engines of medicalization. J Health Soc Behav 46:3
15. Conrad P (2007) The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders
16. Conrad P, Schneider J (1992) Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness (expanded edition
17. Davis R, Medina-Ariza J (2001) Results from an elder abuse prevention experiment in New York City. National Institute of Justice
18. Dayton AK, Wood M, Belian J (2007) Elder law: Readings, cases and materials, 3rd edn
19. Dershowitz A (1967) Psychiatry in the legal process: A knife that cuts both ways. In: The path of the law from 1967: Proceedings and papers at the Harvard Law School Convocation held on the 150th anniversary of its founding. Harvard University Press, A. E. Sutherland
20. DHHS (1999) Office of the Inspector General, external review of hospital quality: A call for greater accountability
21. Donabedian A (1980) The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment, vol 1. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring
22. Doron I (1999) From lunacy to incapacity and beyond - guardianship of the elderly and the Ontario experience in defining "legal incompetence". Health L Canada 19(4):95
23. Ennis B (1971) Civil liberties and mental illness. Crim L Bull 7:101
24. Ennis B (1972) Prisoners of psychiatry: Mental patients and the law
25. Estes C, Binney E (1989) The biomedicalization of aging: Dangers and dilemmas. Gerontologist 29:587
26. Freeman J (2000) The private role in public governance. N Y U L Rev 75:543
27. Frolik L (1981) Plenary guardianship: An analysis, a critique, and a proposal for reform. Ariz L Rev 23:599
28. Frolik L, Barnes A (1992) Elderlaw: Cases and materials
29. Frolik L, Barnes A (2007) Elderlaw, cases and materials, 4th edn
30. Furrow B (1998) Regulating the managed care revolution: Private accreditation and a new system ethos. Vill L Rev 43:361
31. Furrow B, Greaney T, Johnson S, Jost T, Schwartz R (2000) Health law, 2nd edn
32. Furrow B, Greaney T, Johnson S, Jost T, Schwartz R (2004) Health law: Cases, materials and problems, 5th edn
33. Grisso T, Appelbaum P (1995) The MacArthur treatment competence study: III. Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatment. L Hum Behav 19:149
34. Grisso G, Appelbaum P, Mulvey E, Fletcher K (1995) The MacArthur treatment competence study: II. Measures of abilities related to competence to consent to treatment. L Hum Behav 19:127
35. Haycock J (1994) Speaking truth to power: Rights, therapeutic jurisprudence, and Massachusetts Mental Health Law. New Eng J Crim Civ Confinement 20:301
36. Jost T (1983) The joint commission on accreditation of healthcare organizations: Private regulation of healthcare organizations and the public interest. B C L Rev 24:835
37. Jost T (1994) Medicare and the joint commission on accreditation of healthcare organizations: A healthy relationship? Law Contemp Probs 57:15
38. Kapp M (2000) Health care in the marketplace: Implications for decisionally impaired consumers and their surrogates and advocates. Ethics L Aging Rev 6:3
39. Kapp M (2003) The law and older persons: Is geriatric jurisprudence therapeutic?
40. Kinney E (1994) Private accreditation as a substitute for direct government regulation in public health insurance programs: When is it appropriate? Law Contemp Probs 57:47
41. Kittrie N (1971) The right to be different: Deviance and enforced therapy
42. Kuhn T (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn (enlarged
43. Lachs M, Williams C, O'Brien S, Pillemer K (2002) Adult protective service use and nursing home placement. Gerontologist 42(6):734
44. LeGros N, Pinkall J (2002) The new JCAHO patient safety standards and the disclosure of unanticipated outcomes. J Health L 35:189
45. Lehman V (1962) In: Kaplan J, Aldridge G (eds) Guardianship in social welfare of the aging
46. Lock M (1984) Licorice in leviathan: The medicalization of the care of the Japanese elderly. Culture Med Psychiatry 8:121
47. Marson D, Huthwaite J, Hebert K (2004) Testamentary capacity and undue influence in the elderly: A jurisprudent therapy perspective. L Psychol Rev 28:71
48. Melton G, Petrila J, Poythress N, Slobogin C (2007) Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers, 3rd edn
49. Metzger G (2003) Privatization as delegation. Col L Rev 103:1367
50. Michael D (1995) Federal agency use of audited self-regulation as a regulatory technique. Admin L Rev 47:171
51. Miller K (1976) Managing madness: The case against civil commitment
52. Miller K (1980) The criminal justice and mental health systems: Conflict and collusion
53. Miller F, Dawson R, Dix G, Parnas R (1976) The mental health process, 2nd edn
54. Mitchell A (1978) Involuntary guardianship for incompetents: A strategy for legal services advocates. Clearinghouse Rev 12:451
55. Monahan J, Walker L (2006) Social science in law: Cases and materials, 6th edn
56. Morse S (1982) A preference for liberty: The case against involuntary commitment of the mentally disordered. Calif L Rev 70:54
57. Myrdal G (1967) Beyond the welfare state
58. National Guardianship Association (2007) Standards of practice, 3rd edn
59. Parsons T (1951) The social system
60. Perlin M (1992) On "Sanism". SMU L Rev 46:373
61. Perlin M, Dorfman D (1993) Sanism, social science, and the development of mental disability law jurisprudence. Behav Sci L 11:47
62. Petrila J (1993) Paternalism and the unrealized promise of essays in therapeutic jurisprudence: A review of essays in therapeutic jurisprudence. N Y L Sch J Hum Rts 10:877
63. Radford M (2002) Is the use of mediation appropriate in adult guardianship cases? Stetson L Rev 31:611
64. Regan J, Springer (1977) Protective services for the elderly
65. Reisner R, Slobogin C, Rai A (2004) Law and the mental health system: Civil and criminal aspects, 4th edn
66. Report of the National Research Council of the National Academies (2007) Improving the social security representative payee program: Serving beneficiaries and minimizing misuse. National Academy Press, Washington
67. Report of the Task Panel on Legal and Ethical Issues to President's Commission on Mental Health (1978) Report to the President, Vol. IV, appendix
68. Reynolds S (2002) Guardianship primavera: A first look at factors associated with having a legal guardian using a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults. Aging Mental Health 6(2):109
69. Reynolds S, Carson LD (1999) Dependent on the kindness of strangers: Professional guardians for older adults who lack decisional capacity. Aging Mental Health 3(4):301
70. Reynolds S, Wilber K (1997) Protecting persons with severe cognitive and mental disorders: An analysis of public conservatorship in Los Angeles county, California. Aging Mental Health 1(1):87
71. Schmidt W (1986) Adult protective services and the therapeutic state. L Psychol Rev 10:101
72. Schmidt W (1990) Quantitative information about the quality of the guardianship system: Toward a next generation of guardianship research. Prob L J 10:61-80
73. Schmidt (1993) Accountability of lawyers in serving vulnerable, elderly clients. J Elder Abuse Neglect 5(3):39
74. Schmidt W (1995) Guardianship: Court of last resort for the elderly and disabled
75. Schmidt W (2000) Health care financing and delivery for the elderly: A planned, regulated system in counterpoint to a competitive marketplace approach. Ethics L Aging Rev 6:53
76. Schmidt W (2002) The wingspan of wingspread: What is known and not known about the state of the guardianship and public guardianship system thirteen years after the wingspread national guardianship symposium. Stetson L Rev 31(3):1027, 1029-1032
77. Schmidt W (2004) Legal framework for evaluating public guardianship in virginia. 57th annual scientific meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Washington, DC, 22 November 2004
78. Schmidt W, Miller K, Bell W, New E (1981) Public guardianship and the elderly
79. Schmidt W, Miller K, Peters R, Loewenstein D (1988) A descriptive analysis of professional and volunteer programs for the delivery of guardianship services. Prob L J 8:125
80. Schmidt W, Teaster P, Abramson H, Almeida R (1997) Second year evaluation of the Virginia guardian of last resort and guardianship alternatives demonstration project
81. Schmidt W, Akinci F, Wagner S (2007) The relationship between guardian certification requirements and guardian sanctioning: A research issue in elder law and policy. Behav Sci L 25(5):641
82. Schwartz S, Costanzo C (1987) Compelling treatment in the community: Distorted doctrines and violated values. Loyola L Rev 20:1329
83. Slobogin C (1995) Therapeutic jurisprudence: Five dilemmas to ponder. Psychol Pub Pol'y L 1:193
84. Stefan S (1987) Preventive commitment: The concept and its pitfalls. Mental Physical Disability L Rep 11:288
85. Stolle D (1996) Professional responsibility in elder law: A synthesis of preventive law and therapeutic jurisprudence. Behav Sci L 14:459
86. Symposium (1990) Challenging the therapeutic state: Critical perspectives on psychiatry and the mental health system. J Mind Behav 11:247
87. Symposium on private accreditation in the regulatory state (1994) Law Contemp Probs 57:1
88. Szasz T (1968) Law, liberty and psychiatry
89. Teaster P, Schmidt W, Abramson H, Almeida R (1999) Staff service and volunteer staff service models for public guardianship and " alternatives" services: Who is served and with what outcomes? J Ethics L Aging 5(2):131
90. Teaster P, Wood E, Schmidt W, Lawrence S (2008) Public guardianship after 25 years: In the best interest of incapacitated people? University of Kentucky Graduate Center for Gerontology and ABA Commission on Law and Aging, Lexington
91. Wexler D (1990) Therapeutic jurisprudence: The law as a therapeutic agent
92. Wexler D (1993) New directions in therapeutic jurisprudence: Breaking the bounds of traditional mental health law scholarship. N Y L Sch J Hum Rts 10:759
93. Wexler D (1995) Reflections on the scope of therapeutic jurisprudence. Psychol Pub Pol'y L 1:220
94. Wexler D, Winick B (1991) Essays in therapeutic jurisprudence
95. Wexler D, Winick B (1993) Patients, professionals, and the path of therapeutic jurisprudence, a response to Petrila. N Y L Sch J Hum Rts 10:907
96. Wilber K (1991) Alternatives to conservatorship: The role of daily money management services. Gerontologist 31:150
97. Wilber K (1995) The search for effective alternatives to conservatorship: Lessons from a daily money management diversion study. J Aging Soc Pol'y 7(1):39
98. Wilber K (1996) Commentary: Alternatives to guardianship revisited: What's risk got to do with it? In: Smyer M, Schaie KW, Kapp M (eds) Older adults' decision-making and the law. Springer
99. Wilber K (1997) Choice, competence, and competency: The coming of age of protective services research. Gerontologist 37:272
100. Wilber K, Reynolds S (1995) Rethinking alternatives to guardianship. Gerontologist 35:248
101. Williamson J, Shindul J, Evans L (1985) Aging and public policy: Social control or social justice?
102. Wood E (2001) Dispute resolution and dementia: Seeking solutions. Ga L Rev 35:785