Urban Regeneration in the Post-Socialist Context: Budapest and the Search for a Social Dimension

European Planning Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1111-1134

  Keresztély, Krisztina ^a,b   Scott, James W ^c  

^a ACT Consultants   (France)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC REGENERATION; POST-COMMUNISM; REDEVELOPMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN RENEWAL;

BUDAPEST; HUNGARY;

EID: 84863584941     PISSN: 09654313     EISSN: 14695944     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.674346     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Agh, A. (2002) The reform of state administration in Hungary: The capacity of core ministries to manage Europeanization, Budapest Papers on Europeanization, No. 7, Hungarian Centre for Democracy Studies, Budapest.
2. Albechts, L., Healey, P. & Kunzmann, K. R. (2003) Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), pp. 113-129.
3. Barta, Gy. (1999) Industrial restructuring in the Budapest agglomeration, Discussion Papers, 30, Centre for Regional Studies Hungary, Pécs.
4. Berényi, B. E. & Szabó, B. (2009) The housing preferences and the image of inner city neighbourhoods in Budapest, Földrajzi Értesítö, 58(3), pp. 201-214.
5. Bodnár, J. (2000) Fin de Millánaire Budapest. Metamorphoses of Urban Life (St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press).
6. Commission of the European Communities (2006) European Commission (2006) Communication from the Commission to the Council and Parliament. Cohesion Policy and Cities: The Urban Contribution to Growth and Jobs in the Region, COM (2006) 385 final.
7. Commission of the European Communities (2008) Fostering the Urban Dimension. Analysis of the Operational Programmes Co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (2007-2013). Working Document of the Directorate-General for Regional Policy, Brussels: European Commission.
8. Couch, C., Fraser, C. and Percy, S. 2003. Urban Regeneration in Europe, Edited by: Couch, C., Fraser, C. and Percy, S. London: Blackwell Science Ltd.
9. Csanádi, G., Csizmady, A., Ko{double acute}szeghy, L. and Tomay, K. 2006. Belso{double acute}-Erzsébetváros rehabilitáció. Tér és Társadalom, 20(1): 73-92.
10. Csanádi, G., Csizmady, A., Köszeghy, L. and Tomay, K. 2007. "A városrehabilitáció társadalmi hatásai Budapesten". In A történelmi városközpontok átalakulásának társadalmi hatásai, Edited by: Enyedi, Gy. 93-118. Budapest: MTA Társadalomkutató Központ.
11. Csanádi, G., Czismady, A. and Olt, G. 2010. Recent trends in urban renewal in Budapest. Urbani izziv, 21(1): 117-125.
12. Daróczi, E. (1999) Ki a fövarosbol: Valtozas Budapest es az orszag vandorforgalmaban, in: G. Bartha and P. Beluszky (Eds) Tarsadalmi, gazdasagi atalakulas a budapesti agglomeracioban, pp. 69-90 (Budapest: Regionalis Kutatasi Alapitvany).
13. Djordjevic, M. (2006) Politics of Urban Development Planning: Building Urban Governance in Post-Socialist Warsaw? Report, First Annual Doctoral Conference of the Department of Political Science of Central European University, Budapest.
14. Egedy, T., Kovács, Z., Székely, J. and Szemzö, H. 2005. "Fo{double acute}városi rehabilitációs programok és eredmények". In Városrehabilitáció és társadalom, Edited by: Egedy, T. 175-188. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences-FKI.
15. Enyedi, G. (1998) Transformation in Central European postsocialist cities. Discussion papers of the Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, no. 21, Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
16. Fayman, S., Keresztély, K. and Tomay, K. 2008. Les politiques de renouvellement urbain des villes d'Europe centrale illustrées par la réhabilitation de quartiers existants: La ville de Budapest en Hongrie, Paris: Agence Nationale de l'Habitat.
17. Filtenborg, M. S., Gänzle, S. and Johansson, E. 2002. An alternative theoretical approach to EU foreign policy: "Network governance" and the case of the Northern Dimension initiative. Cooperation and Conflict, 37(4): 387-407.
18. Hamedinger, A., Bartik, H. and Wolffhardt, A. 2008. The impact of EU area-based programmes on local governance: Towards a "Europeanization?". Urban Studies, 45(13): 2669-2687.
19. Hamilton, F. E. I., Dimitrovska, K. and Pichler-Milanovič, N. 2005. Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe. Towards Globalization, Edited by: Hamilton, F. E. I., Dimitrovska, K. and Pichler-Milanovič, N. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
20. Hardy, J. 2004. Rebuilding local governance in post-communist economies. The case of Wroclaw, Poland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(4): 303-320.
21. Healey, P. 2007. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times, London: Routledge.
22. Hegedüs, J. and Teller, N. 2007. "Managing risks in the new housing regimes of the transition countries-the case of Hungary". In Home Ownership: Getting In, Getting From, Getting Out, Part II, Edited by: Doling, J. and Elsinga, M. 175-200. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
23. Horváth, G. 1999. Changing Hungarian regional policy and accession to the European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(2): 166-177.
24. Keating, M. and Hughes, J. 2003. The Regional Challenge in Central and Eastern Europe. Territorial Restructuring and European Integration, Edited by: Keating, M. and Hughes, J. Bern: Presses Interuniversitaires Européennes and Peter Lang.
25. Keresztély, K. (2002) The role of the state in the urban development of Budapest. Discussion papers no 39, Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs.
26. Keresztély, K. 2008. "L'inaccessibilité croissante des quartiers historiques de Budapest: Gentryfication et politiques urbaines libérales". In Europe: pas sans toit!, Edited by: Lechevalier Hurard, L. 30-34. Paris: AITEC.
27. Keresztély, K. and Enyedi, Gy. 2003. Love and hatred: Changing relations between the city governments of Budapest and the national governments. Ekistics, 70(420/421): 218-227.
28. Kondor, A. and Horváth, D. 2008. Challenges and experiences of a participative green space development in Budapest-Józsefváros. Urbani Izziv (Urban Challenge), 19(2): 174-182.
29. Kostecki, W., Zukrowska, K. and Goralczyk, B. 2000. Transformations of Post-Communist States, Edited by: Kostecki, W., Zukrowska, K. and Goralczyk, B. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
30. Kovács, Z. 2006. "Social and economic transformation of historical districts in Budapest". In Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres. The Case of Central Europe, Edited by: Enyedi, G. and Kovács, Z. 39-64. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
31. Kovács, Z. 2008. "Social sustainability of historic districts: The East-Central European experience". In Balanced Urban Revitalization for Social Cohesion and Heritage Conservation, Edited by: UNESCO. 55-72. Paris: UNESCO.
32. Kovács Pálné, I. 2009. Europeanisation of territorial governance in three Eastern/Central European countries. Halduskultuur-Administrative Culture, 10: 40-57.
33. Kulcsár, L. and Domokos, T. 2005. The post-socialist growth machine: The case of Hungary. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(3): 550-563.
34. Lauria, M. (Ed.) (1997) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
35. Lewis, P. 1997. "Democratization in Eastern Europe". In Democratization, Edited by: Potter, D., Goldblatt, D., Kiloh, M. and Lewis, P. 393-420. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36. Murzyn, M. A. 2006. "Winners and losers in the game: The social dimension of urban regeneration in the Kazimierz Quarter in Krakow". In Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres. The Case of Central Europe, Edited by: Enyedi, G. and Kovács, Z. 81-106. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
37. Nagy, E. 2005. Urban development in post-transition Hungary: Emerging social conflicts as constraints for a locality. Geographia Polonica, 78(1): 23-38.
38. Potter, D., Kiloh, M. & Lewis, P. (Eds) (1997) Democratization (Cambridge: Polity Press).
39. Przeworski, A. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Przeworski, A. 2000. Democracy and the Market: Political Institutions and Material Well-Being in the World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. RESPECT (2010) Urban Reconstruction, Social Exclusion and the Roma in Bundapest, Workshop at the Central European University, November 19, 2010, Report of the RESPECT project, funded by the Seventh Framework Programme, Budapest: Central European University.
42. Sagan, I. 2009. "Regions, new regionalism and regime theory: Deciphering post-socialist institutional change". In De-Coding New Regionalism: Shifting Socio-political Contexts in Central Europe and Latin America, Edited by: Scott, J. W. 93-109. Aldershot: Ashgate.
43. Sagan, I. & Grabkowska, M. (2012) Urban regeneration in Gdańsk, Poland: Local regimes and tensions between top-down strategies and endogenous renewal, European Planning Studies 20(7). doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.674347.
44. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung. 2008. Die Quartiersräte in Berlin, Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung/Senate Department for Urban Development.
45. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung. 2010. Neighborhood Management in Berlin, Information on the program "Socially Integrative City", Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung/Senate Department for Urban Development.
46. Smith, A. & Rochovská, A. (2007) Domesticating neo-liberalism: Everyday lives and the geographies of post-socialist transformations, Geoforum, 38(6), pp. 1163-1178.
47. Stenning, A. 2005. Post-socialism and the changing geographies of the everyday in Poland. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1): 113-127.
48. Stenning, A., Smith, A., Rochovská, A. and Świa̧tek, D. 2010. Domesticating Neo-Liberalism: Spaces of Economic Practice and Social Reproduction in Post-Socialist Cities, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
49. Stoker, G. 1995. "Regime theory and urban politics". In Theories of Urban Politics, Edited by: Judge, D., Stoker, G. and Wolman, H. 54-71. London: Sage.
50. Sykora, L. 1999. Changes in the internal spatial structure of post-communist Prague. GeoJournal, 49(1): 79-89.
51. Tarrow, S. 1994. Power in Movement: Collective Action, Social Movements and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Tatur, M. 2004. The Making of Regions in Post-Socialist Europe-The Impact of Culture, Economic Structure and Institutions. Case Studies from Poland, Hungary, Romania and Ukraine, Vol. I, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
53. Tocsis, I. 2005. "Post-socialist Budapest. The invasion of market forces and the response of public leadership". In Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe. Towards Globalization, Edited by: Hamilton, F. E. I., Dimitrovska, K. and Pichler-Milanovič, N. 248-280. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
54. de Vet, J. M. 2010. "The state of European cities and their positions in the new member states". In Regional Development in Central and Eastern Europe, Edited by: Grozelak, G., Bachtler, J. and Smetkowski, M. 93-114. London: Routledge.
55. Wollmann, H. and Lankina, T. 2003. "Local government in Poland and Hungary: From post-communist reform towards EU accession". In Local Democracy in Post-Communist Europe, Edited by: Baldersheim, H., Illner, M. and Wollmann, H. 91-122. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
56. http://www.blikk.hu/cikk.php?cikk=131986
57. http://epiteszforum.hu/node/8897
58. http://epiteszforum.hu/node/9500
59. http://epiteszforum.hu/node/9464
60. http://www.cordia.hu/
61. http://index.hu/belfold/budapest/prater8158
62. http://8ker.blog.hu/2009/05/05/corvin_mozi_forum
63. http://www.origo.hu/ingatlan/20090109-gazdasagi-valsag-es-hatasa-nagy-magyarorszegi-ingatanfejlesztesek.html
64. http://www.hg.hu/cikk/megepult_a_grund