Communication in the courtroom and the "appearance" of justice

Applications of Nonverbal Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 41-62

  Searcy, Michael ^a   Duck, Steve ^b   Blanck, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b University of Iowa   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863556038     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612786     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Administrative Office of Courts. (2002, July 8). Judicial Rules arid Procedures: Criminal Rule 2, Retrieved March 1, 2003 from http://www.alacourt.org/ Publications/Rules/Crirninal/rule09-2.htm
2. Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. I., & Richeson, L. A. (2000). Towards a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M. E Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 201-272). Boston: Academic Press.
3. Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Conner, B. (1999). Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 538-547.
4. Ambady, N., Hallahan, M, & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518-529.
5. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 256-274.
6. Argyle, M. (1967). The psychology of interpersonal behaviour. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
7. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception: A psychophysiological and international perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Blanck, E (1991). What empirical research tells us: Studying judges' and juries' behavior. American University Law Review, Winter, 2-24.
9. Blanck, E D. (1993). Calibrating the scales of justice: Studylngjudges' behavior in bench trials. Indiana Law Journal, 68(4), 1119-1198.
10. Blanck, E D., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Nonverbal behavior in the courtroom. In R. Feldman (Ed.), Applications of nonverbal behavioral theories and research (pp. 89-115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Blanck, E D., Rosenthal, R., & Cordell, L. H. (1985). The appearance ofjustice: Judges' verbal and nonverbal behavior in criminal jury trials. Stanford Law Review, 38(1), 89-164.
12. Blumenthal, J. A. (1993). A wipe of the hands, a lick of the lips: The validity of demeanor evidence in assessing witness credibility. Nebraska Law Review, 72, 2-44.
13. Boccaccini, M. T. (2002). What do we really know about witness preparation? Behavioral sciences and the law, 20(1-2), 161-189.
14. Bond, C. F., Jr., Omar, A., Pitre, U., Lashley, B. R., Skaggs, L. M., & Kirk, C. T. (1992). Fishy-looking liars: Deception judgment from expectancy violation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 969-977.
15. Burgoon, J. K. (1983). Nonverbal violations of expectations. In J. Wiemann & R. R Harrison (Eds.) Nonverbal Interaction (pp. 77-111). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Burgoon, J. K., & Buller, D. B. (1994). Interpersonal deception: III. Effects of deceit on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18(2), 155-184.
17. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Ebesu, A., & Rockwell, E (1994). Interpersonal deception: V. Accuracy in deception detection. Communication Monographs, 61, 303-325.
18. Burgoon, J. K., & Jones, S. B. (1976). Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations. Human Communication Research, 2, 131-146.
19. Burgoon, J. K., LePoire, B. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 287-321.
20. Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995), Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Caughfield, L. E. (2001). Credibility. Litigation, 27(4), 2-8.
22. Chang, Y. (2003). Who speaks next? Discourse Structure as persuasion in Chinese criminal courtrooms. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association. Miami Beach, Florida, November.
23. Dindia, K. (2000). Self-disclosure, identity, and relationship development: A dialectical perspective. In K. Dindia & S. Duck (Eds.), Communication and personal relationships (pp. 147-162). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
24. Dindia, K., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1989). Self-disclosure in spouse and stranger dyads: A social relations analysis. San Francisco: International Communication Association.
25. Dollins, A. B., Cestaro, V. L., & Pettit, D. J. (1998). Efficacy of repeated psychophysiological detection of deception testing. Journal of Forensic Science, 43(5), 1016-1023.
26. Duck, S. W. (1998). Human relationships (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
27. Duck, S. W. (2003). A new model of interpersonal influence in juries (and trials) [SCIPI]. Paper presented to the Annual Convention of American Society of Trial Consultants, Reno, NV, June.
28. Duck, S. W., & VanderVoort, L. A. (2002). Scarlet letters and whited sepulchers: The social marking of relationships as "inappropriate." In R. Goodwin & D. Cramer (Eds.), Inappropriate relationships: The unconventional, the disapproved, and the forbidden (pp. 3-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Ekman, R (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
30. Ekman, R, & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98.
31. Elaad, E. (2003). Is the inference rule of the "control question polygraph technique" plausible? Psychology, Crime & Law, 9(1), 37-47.
32. Fiedler, K., & Schenck, W. (2001). Spontaneous inferences from pictorially presented behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1533-1546.
33. Galvin, K. M., Bylund, C. L., & Brommel, B. J. (2004). Family communication: Cohesion and change (6th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/ Longman, Inc.
34. Hickson, M., Stacks, D. W., & Moore, N. J. (2003). Nonverbal communication: Studies and applications. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
35. Hirokawa, R. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness II: An exploratory investigation of procedural functions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47(Winter), 59-74.
36. Hirokawa, R., & Rost, K. M. (1992). Effective group decision making in organizations: Field test of the vigilant interaction theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 5(3), 267-288.
37. Hirokawa, R. Y., DeGooyer, D. H., & Valde, K. (2000). Using narratives to study task group effectiveness. Small Group Research, 31(5), 573-591.
38. Holden, C. (2001, 9 February). Polygraph Screening: Panel seeks truth in lie detector debate. Science, 291, 967.
39. Hollien, H., Geison, L., & Hicks, J. W., Jr. (1987). Voice stress evaluators and lie detection. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 32(2), 405-418.
40. Izard, C. E. (1971). Theface of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
41. Janis, I. L. (1989). Crucial decisions: Leadership in policymaking and crisis management. New York: The Free Press.
42. Jourard, S. M. (1971). The Transparent Self (rev. ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
43. Juan Rodriguez Chavez v. Janie Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, United States Court of Appeals: Fifth Circuit (2002).
44. Kassin, S. M. (2002). Human judges of truth, deception, and credibility: Confident but erroneous. Cardozo Law Review, 23(Feb), 2-7.
45. Keeley, M., & Hart, A. (1994). Nonverbal behavior in dyadic interaction. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Dynamics of relationships [Understanding relationships 4] (pp. 135-162). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
46. Knapp, M., & Hall, J. (2002). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (5th ed.). London: Wadsworth.
47. Kressel, N. J., & Kressel, D. F. (2002). Stack and sway: The new science of jury consulting. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
48. Lefkowitz, M., Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1955). Status factors in pedestrian violations of traffic signals. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51,704-706.
49. Lykken, D. T. (1981). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
50. Milford, L. S. (2001). Nonverbal communication. Litigation, 27(4), 2-9.
51. Orne, M. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.
52. The polygraph and lie detection. (2003). Washington, DC: National Research Council. Committee to review the scientific evidence on the polygraph. Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. The National Academies Press. Retrieved December 1, 2002 from http://antipolygraph.org
53. Pritchard, M. E., & Keenan, J. M. (2002). Does jury deliberation really improve jurors' memories? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(5), 589-601.
54. Rand, J. W. (2000). The demeanor gap: Race, lie detection, and the jury. Connecticut Law Review, 33, 2-61.
55. Rosenthal, R. (2002). Covert communication in classrooms, clinics, courtrooms, and cubicles. American Psychologist, 57(11), 839-849.
56. Saks, M. J. (1997). What do jury experiments tell us about how juries (should) make decisions? Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, Fall, 1-38.
57. Searcy, M. A. (2003). Social problematic integration theory (the spit model): Taking the cognitive theory of problematic integration into close family communication (paper presentation). Omaha, NE: Central States Communication Association.
58. Spencer, E. E. (1994). Transforming relationships through ordinary talk. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Understanding relationship processes 4: Dynamics of relationships, (pp. 58-85). Newbury Park: SAGE.
59. VanderVoort, L. A., & Duck, S. W. (2004). In appropriate relationships and out of them: The social paradoxes of normative and non-normative relational forms. Forthcoming in G. A. Allan, J. Duncombe, K. Harrison, & D. Marsden (Eds.), The State of Affairs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Williams, S. M. (1997). Narrative rationality in jury decision-making. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.