CoHadoop: Flexible data placement and its exploitation in Hadoop

Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Volumn 4, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 575-585

  Eltabakh, Mohamed Y ^a,d   Tian, Yuanyuan ^a   Özcan, Fatma ^a   Gemulla, Rainer ^b   Krettek, Aljoscha ^c   McPherson, John ^a  

^a IBM ALMADEN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

^c IBM   (Germany)

^d Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL STORAGE; EFFICIENCY; FAULT TOLERANCE;

DATA PARTITION; DATA PARTITIONING; DATA PLACEMENT; FAULT TOLERANCE PROPERTY; LARGE SCALE DATA; PERFORMANCE BOTTLENECKS; RELATIONAL DATABASE; SESSIONIZATION;

DATA HANDLING;

EID: 84863554438     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21508097     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.14778/2002938.2002943     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. A. Abouzeid and et al. HadoopDB: An Architectural Hybrid of MapReduce and DBMS echnologies for Analytical Workloads. In VLDB, pages 922-933, 2009.
2. S. Blanas and et al. A comparison of join algorithms for log processing in mapreduce. In SIGMOD, pages 975-986, 2010.
3. S. Chen. Cheetah: A high performance, custom data warehouse on top of mapreduce. In VLDB, pages 1459-1468, 2010.
4. J. Dean and et al. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. In OSDI, pages 137-150, 2004.
5. D. DeWitt, J. Naughton, D. Schneider, and S. Seshadri. Practical Skew Handling in Parallel Joins. In VLDB, pages 27-40, 1992.
6. J. Dittrich et al. Hadoop++: Making a yellow elephant run like a cheetah (without it even noticing). In VLDB, volume 3, pages 518-529, 2010.
7. G. Graefe. Encapsulation of parallelism in the Volcano query processing system. SIGMOD Rec., 19(2):102-111, 1990.
8. Hive. http://hadoop.apache.org/hive.
9. Jaql. http://code.google.com/p/jaql.
10. D. Jiang, B. C. Ooi, L. Shi, and S. Wu. The performance of mapreduce: An in-depth study. PVLDB, 3(1):472-483, 2010.
11. H. Liu and D. Orban. Gridbatch: Cloud computing for large-scale data-intensive batch applications. In CCGRID, pages 295-305, 2008.
12. C. Olston et al. Pig Latin: A Not-So-Foreign Language for Data Processing. In SIGMOD, pages 1099-1110, 2008.
13. C. Olston, B. Reed, A. Silberstein, and U. Srivastava. Automatic optimization of parallel dataflow programs. In USENIX, pages 267-273, 2008.
14. A. Pavlo and et al. A comparison of approaches to large-scale data analysis. In SIGMOD, pages 165-178, 2009.
15. Pig. http://hadoop.apache.org/pig.
16. M. Stonebraker and et al. Mapreduce and parallel dbmss: friends or foes? Commun. ACM, 53(1):64-71, 2010.
17. The Apache Software Foundation. Hadoop. http://hadoop.apache.org.
18. The Apache Software Foundation. HDFS architecture guide. http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/current/hdfs_design.html.
19. A. Thusoo et al. Hive - A Warehousing Solution Over a Map-Reduce Framework. PVLDB, 2(2):1626-1629, 2009.
20. P. Valduriez. Parallel database management. Encyclopedia of Database Systems, 2009.