Monotonic bayesian semiparametric benchmark dose analysis

Risk Analysis

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1207-1218

  Wheeler, Matthew ^a   Bailer, A John ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Benchmark dose estimation; Dichotomous response; Monotonic dose response; Quantal response models; Splines

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN; BENCHMARK DOSE; DICHOTOMOUS RESPONSE; DOSE RESPONSE; QUANTAL RESPONSE;

BIOASSAY; ESTIMATION; SPLINES;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

1 BROMOPROPANE; 1-BROMOPROPANE; BROMINATED HYDROCARBON;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; POLLUTANT SOURCE; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOSE RESPONSE; LUNG TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; RAT; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HYDROCARBONS, BROMINATED; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RATS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84863547486     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01786.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Crump K. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1984; 4:854-871.
2. Raftery AE. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 1994; 25:111-163.
3. Buckland ST, Burnham KP, Augustin NH. Model selection: An integral part of inference. Biometrics, 1997; 53: 603-618.
4. Kang SH, Kodell RL, Chen JJ. Incorporating model uncertainties along with data uncertainties in microbial risk assessment. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2000; 32:68-72.
5. Wheeler MW, Bailer AJ. Properties of model-averaged BMDLs: A study of model averaging in dichotomous response risk estimation. Risk Analysis, 2007; 27:659-670.
6. Faes C, Aerts M, Geys H, Molenberghs G. Model averaging using fractional polynomials to estimate a safe level of exposure. Risk Analysis, 2007; 27:111-123.
7. Ramsay JO. Functional Data Analysis. New York : Springer, 2005.
8. Lavine M, Mockus A. A nonparametric Bayes method for isotonic regression. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1995; 46:235-248.
9. Muller P, Quintana FA. Nonparametric Bayesian data analysis. Statistical Science, 2004; 19:95-110.
10. Neelon B, Dunson DB. Bayesian isotonic regression and trend analysis. Biometrics, 2004; 60:398-406.
11. Brezger A, Steiner WJ. Monotonic regression based on Bayesian P-splines: An application to estimating price response functions from store-level scanner data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2008; 26:99-104.
12. Bolstad WM. Understanding Computational Bayesian Statistics. Wiley, 2010.
13. Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS: A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 2000; 10:325-337.
14. Gelfand AE, Smith AFM. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1990; 85:398-409.
15. Geman S, Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. Journal of Applied Statistics, 1993; 20:25-62.
16. Eilers PHC, Marx BD. Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. Statistical Science, 1996; 11:89-121.
17. Lang S, Brezger A. Bayesian P-splines. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2004; 13:183-212.
18. Biller C. Adaptive Bayesian regression splines in semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2000; 9:122-140.
19. Lindstrom MJ. Bayesian estimation of free-knot splines using reversible jumps. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2002; 41:255-269.
20. Holmes C, Mallick B. Bayesian regression with multivariate linear splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 2001; 61:3-17.
21. National Toxicology Program. NTP Technical Report on Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of 1-Bromopropane (CAS NO. 106-94-5) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Inhalation Studies). NTP TR 564, NIH Publication No. 10-5906. Research Triangle Park, NC : National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, 2009.
22. Wheeler MW, Bailer AJ. Model averaging software for dichotomous dose response risk estimation. Journal of Statistical Software, 2008; 26.
23. Wheeler MW, Bailer AJ. Comparing model averaging with other model selection strategies for benchmark dose estimation. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2009; 16: 37-51.
24. Albert JH, Chib S. Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1993; 88: 669-679.