Distinguishing venues by writing styles

Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 371-372

  Yang, Zaihan ^a   Davison, Brian D ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

classification; features

Indexed keywords

CITESEER; CLASSIFICATION APPROACH; FEATURES; WRITING STYLE;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); PUBLISHING;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 84863545430     PISSN: 15525996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2232817.2232896     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. O. de Vel. Mining Email authorship. In Text Mining Workshop. KDD, 2000.
2. O. de Vel, A. Anderson, M. Corney, and G. Mohay. Mining e-mail content for author identification forensics. SIGMOD Record, 30(4):55-64, 2001. (Pubitemid 33720999)
3. G.Zipf. Human Behaviour and the principle of least effort. An introduction to human ecology. Oxford, England: Addison-Wesley Press, 1949.
4. D. Holmes and R. Forsyth. The Federalist revisited: New Directions in author attribution. In Library and Linguistic Computing, pages 111-127, 1995.
5. J. Karlgren. The wheres and whyfores for studying text genre computationally. In Workshop on Style and Meaning in Larguange, Art, Music and Design. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2004.
6. T. Mendenhall. The characteristics curves of composition. Science, 11(11):237-249, 1887.
7. F. Mosteller and D. Wallace. Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist. Addison-Wesleym Reading, Mass., 1964.
8. E. Stamatatos, N. Fakotakis, and G. Kokkinakis. Automatic text categorization in terms of genres and author. Comp. Ling, 26(4):471-495, 2001.