Dynamic compilation

The Compiler Design Handbook: Optimizations and Machine Code Generation

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 739-761

  Duesterwald, Evelyn ^a  

^a HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863540587     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420040579     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. L. Anderson, M. Berc, J. Dean, M. Ghemawat, S. Henzinger, S. Leung, L. Sites, M. Vandervoorde C. Waldspurger and W. Weihl, Continuous Profiling: Where Have All the Cycles Gone, in Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium of Operating Systems Principles, 14, 1997.
2. D. Bruening and E. Duesterwald, Exploring Optimal Compilation Unit Shapes for an Embedded Just-in-Time Compiler, in Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization, 2000.
3. D. Bruening, E. Duesterwald and S. Amarasinghe, Design and Implementation of a Dynamic Optimization Framework for Windows, in Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization, December 2001.
4. V. Bala, E. Duesterwald and S. Banerjia, Transparent Dynamic Optimization: The Design and Implementation of Dynamo, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Technical report HPL-1999-78, June 1999.
5. V. Bala, E. Duesterwald and S. Banerjia, Dynamo: A Transparent Runtime Optimization System, in Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '00 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, June 2000, pp. 1-12.
6. T. Ball and J. Larus, Efficient Path Profiling, in Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO-29), Paris, 1996, pp. 46-57.
7. W. Chen, S. Lerner, R. Chaiken and D. Gillies, Mojo: A Dynamic Optimization System, in Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization, December 2000.
8. R.F. Cmelik and D. Keppel, Shade: A Fast Instruction Set Simulator for Execution Profiling, Technical report UWCSE-93-06-06, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 1993.
9. C. Consel and F. Noel, A General Approach for Run-Time Specialization and Its Application to C, in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, 1996, pp. 145-156.
10. T. Conte, B. Patel, K. Menezes and J. Cox, Hardware-based profiling: an effective technique for profile-driven optimization, Int. J. Parallel Programming, 24, 187-206, April 1996.
11. C. Chambers and D. Ungar, Customization: Optimizing Compiler Technology for SELF, a Dynamically-Typed Object-Oriented Programming Language, in Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '89 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, 1989, pp. 146-160.
12. Y.C. Chung and Y. Byung-Sun, The Latte Java Virtual Machine, Mass Laboratory, Seoul National University, Korea, latte.snu.ac.kr/manual/html mono/latte.html.
13. R. Cohn and G. Lowney, Hot Cold Optimization of LargeWindows/NT Applications, in Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 1996, pp. 80-89.
14. D. Ditzel, Transmeta’s Crusoe: Cool chips for mobile computing, in Hot Chips 12, Stanford University, August 2000.
15. D. Deaver, R. Gorton and N. Rubin, Wiggins/Redstone: An On-Line Program Specializer, in Proceedings of Hot Chips 11, Palo Alto, CA, August 1999.
16. E. Duesterwald, R. Gupta and M.L. Soffa, Demand-Driven Computation of Interprocedural Data Flow, in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Principles on Programming Languages, 1995, pp. 37-48.
17. E. Duesterwald and V. Bala, Software Profiling for Hot Path Prediction: Less Is More, in Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 2000, pp. 202-211.
18. L.P. Deutsch and A.M. Schiffman, Efficient Implementation of the Smalltalk-80 System, in Conference Record of the 11th Annual ACMSymposium on Principles of Programming Languages, 1994, pp. 297-302.
19. K. Ebcioglu and E. Altman, DAISY: Dynamic Compilation for 100% Architectural Compatibility, in Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 1997, pp. 26-37.
20. D.R. Engler, VCODE: A Retargetable, Extensible, Very Fast Dynamic Code Generation System, in Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '96 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI '96), May 1996, pp. 160-170.
21. D.H. Friendly, S.J. Patel and Y.N. Patt, Putting the Fill Unit to Work: Dynamic Optimizations for Trace Cache Microprocessors, in Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO-31), 1998, pp. 173-181.
22. M. Gschwind and E. Altman, Optimization and Precise Exceptions in Dynamic Compilation, in Proceedings of Workshop on Binary Translation, 2000.
23. J. Gosling, B. Joy and G. Steele, The Java Language Specification, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1996.
24. B. Grant, M. Philipose, M. Mock, C. Chambers and S. Eggers, An Evaluation of Staged Run-Time Optimizations in DyC, in Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '99 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, 1999, pp. 293-303.
25. U. Hoelzle, C. Chambers and D. Ungar, Optimizing Dynamically-Typed Object-Oriented Languages with Polymorphic Inline Caches, in Proceedings ECCOP 4th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, July 1991, pp. 21-38.
26. U. Hoelzle, C. Chambers and D. Ungar, Debugging Optimized Code with Dynamic Deoptimization, in Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '92 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, June 1992, pp. 32-43.
27. R.J. Hookway and M.A. Herdeg, FX!32: combining emulation and binary translation, Digital Tech. J., 0(1), pp. 3-12, 1997.
28. Open Runtime Platform, Intel Microprocessor Research Lab, www.intel.com/research/mrl/orp/.
29. The IBM Jalapeno Project, IBM Research, www.research.ibm.com/jalapeno/.
30. C. Krintz and B. Calder, Using Annotations to Reduce Dynamic Optimization Time, in Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '01 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, 2001, pp. 156-167.
31. M. Leone and P. Lee, Optimizing ML with Run-Time Code Generation, in Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '96 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, 1996, pp. 137-148.
32. M. Mock, M. Berryman, C. Chambers and S. Eggers, Calpa: A Tool for Automatic Dynamic Compilation, in Proceedings of the 2ndWorkshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization, 1999.
33. M. Poletta, D.R. Engler and M.F. Kaashoek, TCC: A System for Fast Flexible, and High-Level Dynamic Code Generation, in Proceedings of the SIGPLAN '97 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, 1997, pp. 109-121.
34. S. Richardson, Exploiting Trivial and Redundant Computation, in Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Computer Aruthmetic, 1993.
35. K. Scott and J. Davidson, Strata: A Software Dynamic Translation Infrastructure, in Proceedings of the 2001 Workshop on Binary Translation, Barcelona, Spain, 2001.
36. A. Srivastava, A. Edwards and H. Vo, Vulcan: Binary Translation in a Distributed Environment, Technical report MSR-TR-2001-50, Microsoft Research, 2001.
37. Transitive Technologies, www.transitives.com/.
38. O. Taub, S. Schechter and M.D. Smith, Ephemeral Instrumentation for Lightweight Program Profiling, Technical Report, Harvard University, 2000.
39. D. Ung and C. Cifuentes, Machine-adaptable dynamic binary translation, in Proceedings of the ACM Sigplan Workshop on Dynamic and Adaptive Compilation, ACM Sigplan Notices, 35(7), 41-51, 2000.
40. X. Zhang, Z. Wang, N. Gloy, J. Chen and M. Smith, System Support for Automatic Profiling and Optimization, in Proceedings of the 16th ACMSymposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1997, pp. 15-26.