Toxicity and genotoxicity of Nano-SiO2 on human epithelial intestinal HT-29 cell line

Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 622-630

  Sergent, Jacques Aurélien ^a   Paget, Vincent ^a   Chevillard, Sylvie ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RADIOBIOLOGIE CELLULAIRE ET MOLÉCULAIRE   (France)

Author keywords

Cytotoxicity; Flow cytometry; Genotoxicity; HT 29; Impedancemetry; Nanoparticles; Silica nanoparticle

Indexed keywords

CELL LINES; CELL VIABILITY; CONVENTIONAL APPROACH; CRITICAL ISSUES; CYTOTOXIC; GENOTOXIC EFFECTS; GENOTOXICITIES; HT-29; HUMAN HEALTH; HUMAN INTESTINE; IMPEDANCEMETRY; INTRINSIC PROPERTY; MEASURING CELLS; MESOPOROUS NANOPARTICLE; NANO- SIO; NORMAL TISSUE; ORAL ROUTE; PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS; REAL TIME MONITORING; SIDE EFFECT; SILICA NANOPARTICLES; SULFORHODAMINE B; VIDEO MICROSCOPY;

CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOTOXICITY; DRUG DELIVERY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HEALTH HAZARDS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; NANOPARTICLES; SILICA; TISSUE;

SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

EXCIPIENT; H2AFX PROTEIN, HUMAN; HISTONE; MUTAGENIC AGENT; NANOPARTICLE; SILICON DIOXIDE;

CELL DEATH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRAIN HT29; CELL SURVIVAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CYTOLOGY; DOSE RESPONSE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG EFFECT; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; INTESTINE MUCOSA; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MUTAGEN TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PARTICLE SIZE; PHOSPHORYLATION; POLLUTANT; STAINING;

CELL DEATH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; EXCIPIENTS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HISTONES; HT29 CELLS; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MUTAGENICITY TESTS; MUTAGENS; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE; PHOSPHORYLATION; SILICON DIOXIDE; STAINING AND LABELING; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84863533314     PISSN: 00034878     EISSN: 14753162     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mes005     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. (2004) Image Processing with Image J. Biophotonics Int; 11: 36-42.
2. Ai J, Biazar E, Jafarpour M et al. (2011) Nanotoxicology and nanoparticle safety in biomedical designs. Int J Nanomedicine; 6: 1117-27.
3. Bagwe RP, Yang C, Hilliard LR et al. (2004) Optimization of dye-doped silica nanoparticles prepared using a reverse microemulsion method. Langmuir; 20: 8336-42.
4. Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR et al. (2006) CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol; 7: R100.
5. Clift MJ, Gehr P, Rothen-Rutishauser B. (2010) Nanotoxicology: a perspective and discussion of whether or not in vitro testing is a valid alternative. Arch Toxicol; 85: 723-31.
6. Fadeel B, Garcia-Bennett AE. (2010) Better safe than sorry: understanding the toxicological properties of inorganic nanoparticles manufactured for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 62: 362-74.
7. Forgue-Lafitte ME, Coudray AM, Bréant B et al. (1989) Proliferation of the human colon carcinoma cell line HT29: autocrine growth and deregulated expression of the c-myc oncogene. Cancer Res; 49: 6566-71. (Pubitemid 20008788)
8. Kahru A, Dubourguier HC. (2010) From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology. Toxicology; 269: 105-19.
9. Ke N, Wang X, Xu X et al. (2011) The xCELLigence system for real-time and label-free monitoring of cell viability. Methods Mol Biol; 740: 33-43.
10. Kurath M, Maasen S. (2006) Toxicology as a nanoscience?- disciplinary identities reconsidered. Part Fibre Toxicol; 3: 6.
11. Laaksonen T, Santos H, Vihola H et al. (2007) Failure of MTT as a toxicity testing agent for mesoporous silicon microparticles. Chem Res Toxicol; 20: 1913-18.
12. Le Bivic A, Hirn M, Reggio H. (1988) HT-29 cells are an in vitro model for the generation of cell polarity in epithelia during embryonic differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 85: 136-40.
13. Paget V, Sergent JA, Chevillard S. (2011) Nano-silicon dioxide toxicological characterization on two human kidney cell lines. J Phys: Conf Ser; 304: 012080.
14. Polak-Charcon S, Ben-Shaul Y. (1979) Degradation of tight junctions in HT29, a human colon adenocarcinoma cell line. J Cell Sci; 35: 393-402. (Pubitemid 9092091)
15. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH et al. (1998) DNA doublestranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem; 273: 5858-68. (Pubitemid 28124064)
16. Rosignoli P, Fabiani R, De Bartolomeo A et al. (2001) Protective activity of butyrate on hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage in isolated human colonocytes and HT29 tumour cells. Carcinogenesis; 22: 1675-80. (Pubitemid 32952146)
17. Rousset M. (1986) The human colon carcinoma cell lines HT-29 and Caco-2: two in vitro models for the study of intestinal differentiation. Biochimie; 68: 1035-40. (Pubitemid 16003666)
18. Skehan P, Storeng R, Scudiero D et al. (1990) New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J Natl Cancer Inst; 82: 1107-12. (Pubitemid 20213250)
19. Vistejnova L, Dvorakova J, Hasova M et al. (2009) The comparison of impedance-based method of cell proliferation monitoring with commonly used metabolic-based techniques. Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 30 (Suppl 1): 121-7.
20. Wang TT, Chai F, Wang CG et al. (2011) Fluorescent hollow/ rattle-type mesoporous Au@SiO2 nanocapsules for drug delivery and fluorescence imaging of cancer cells. J Colloid Interface Sci; 358: 109-15.