Chemspot: A hybrid system for chemical named entity recognition

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1633-1640

  Rocktäschel, Tim ^a   Weidlich, Michael ^a   Leser, Ulf ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGY; BOOK; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NOMENCLATURE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DICTIONARIES, CHEMICAL; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; SOFTWARE; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84863506694     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts183     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alex, B. et al. (2008) Assisted curation: does text mining really help. In Proc. of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Kohala Coast, Hawaii, USA. Vol. 13, pp. 556-567.
2. Alexopoulou, D. et al. (2009) Biomedical word sense disambiguation with ontologies and metadata: automation meets accuracy. BMC Bioinformatics, 10:28.
3. Ananiadou, S. et al. (2006) Text mining and its potential applications in systems biology. Trends Biotechnol., 24, 571-579.
4. Aronson, A. (2001) Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program. In Proc. of the AMIA Symposium, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 17-21.
5. Banville, D. (2006) Mining chemical structural information from the drug literature. Drug Discov. Today, 11, 35-42.
6. Bordbar, A. and Palsson, B.O. (2011) Using the reconstructed genome-scale human metabolic network to study physiology and pathology. J. Intern. Med, 271, pp. 131-141.
7. Brecher, J. (1999) Name=struct: a practical approach to the sorry state of real-life chemical nomenclature. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39, 943-950.
8. Buyko, E. et al. (2006) Automatically adapting an NLP core engine to the biology domain. In Proc. of the Joint BioLINK-Bio-Ontologies Meeting, Fortaleza, Brazil, pp. 65-68.
9. Cohen, A. and Hersh, W. (2005) A survey of current work in biomedical text mining. Brief. Bioinformatics., 6, 57-71.
10. Corbett, P. and Copestake, A. (2008) Cascaded classifiers for confidence-based chemical named entity recognition. BMC Bioinformatics, 9:S4.
11. Corbett, P. and Murray-Rust, P. (2006) High-throughput identification of chemistry in life science texts. In Proc. of 2nd International Symposium on Computational Life Science (CompLife 2006, LNBI 4216). Cambridge, UK, pp. 107-118.
12. Duarte, N. et al. (2007) Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. In Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences.Vol. 104, pp. 1777-1782.
13. Erhardt, R. et al. (2006) Status of text-mining techniques applied to biomedical text. Drug Discov. Today, 11, 315-325.
14. Fluck, J. et al. (2007) Prominer: recognition of human gene and protein names using regularly updated dictionaries. In Proc. of the Second BioCreAtIvE Challenge Workshop, Madrid, Spain, pp. 149-152.
15. Gerner, M. et al. (2010) LINNAEUS: a species name identification system for biomedical literature. BMC Bioinformatics, 11:85.
16. Gille, C. et al. (2010) Hepatonet1: a comprehensive metabolic reconstruction of the human hepatocyte for the analysis of liver physiology. Mol. Syst. Biol., 6:411.
17. Hakenberg, J. et al. (2011) The GNAT library for local and remote gene mention normalization. Bioinformatics, 27, 2769-2771.
18. Hettne, K.M. et al. (2009) A dictionary to identify small molecules and drugs in free text. Bioinformatics, 25, 2983-2991.
19. Hettne, K.M. et al. (2010) Automatic vs. manual curation of a multi-source chemical dictionary: the impact on text mining. J. Chem. Inf., 2:3.
20. Jessop, D. et al. (2011) Oscar4: a flexible architecture for chemical text-mining. J. Chem. Inf, 3:41.
21. Klinger, R. and Tomanek, K. (2007) Classical probabilistic models and conditional random fields. Technical Report TR07-2-013. Department of Computer Science, Dortmund University of Technology. ISSN 1864-4503.
22. Klinger, R. et al. (2008) Detection of IUPAC and IUPAC-like chemical names. Bioinformatics, 24, i268-i276. In Proc. of the International Conference Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB).
23. Kolářik, C. et al. (2008) Chemical names: terminological resources and corpora annotation. In Proc. of the Workshop on Building and Evaluating Resources for Biomedical Text Mining, Marrakech, Morocco, pp. 51-58.
24. Kolluru, B. et al. (2011) Using workflows to explore and optimise named entity recognition for chemistry. PLoS ONE, 6:e20181.
25. Krallinger, M. et al. (2008) Evaluation of text-mining systems for biology: overview of the second biocreative community challenge. Genome Biol., 9:S1.
26. Lafferty, J. et al. (2001) Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. of ICML-2001, Williamstown, Massachusetts, USA.
27. Leaman, R. and Gonzalez, G. (2008) BANNER: an executable survey of advances in biomedical named entity recognition. In Proc. of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Fairmont Orchid, Hawaii, USA. Vol. 13, pp. 652-663.
28. Ma, H. et al. (2007) The edinburgh human metabolic network reconstruction and its functional analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol., 3:135.
29. McCallum, A. (2002) MALLET:A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit. http://mallet. cs.umass.edu.
30. McCallum, A. (2003) Efficiently inducing features of conditional random fields. In Proc. of the Nineteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI03), Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 403-410.
31. McCallum, A. and Freitag, D. (2000) Maximum entropy Markov models for information extraction and segmentation, In Proc. of ICML-2000, Stanford, California, USA, pp. 591-598.
32. Schuemie, M. et al. (2007) Peregrine: lightweight gene name normalization by dictionary lookup. In Proc. of the Second BioCreative Challenge, Madrid, Spain, pp. 131-133.
33. Segura-Bedmar, I. et al. (2008) Drug name recognition and classification in biomedical texts: a case study outlining approaches underpinning automated systems. Drug Discov. Today, 13, 816-823.
34. Segura-Bedmar, I. et al. (2010) Extracting drug-drug interactions from biomedical texts. BMC Bioinformatics, 11 (Suppl. 5):P9.
35. Settles, B. (2005)ABNER: an open source tool for automatically tagging genes, proteins, and other entity names in text. Bioinformatics, 21, 3191-3192.
36. Thomas, P. et al. (2010) GeneView gene-centric ranking of biomedical text. In Proc. of the BioCreative III Workshop, Bethesda, USA, pp. 137-142.
37. Tikk, D. et al. (2010)Acomprehensive benchmark of kernel methods to extract proteinprotein interactions from literature. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6:e1000837.