Amending and defending Critical Contextual Empiricism

European Journal for Philosophy of Science

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 435-449

  Borgerson, Kirstin ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alvin Goldman; Critical Contextual Empiricism; David Michaels; Feminist epistemology; Helen Longino; Kristen Intemann; Medical research; Social epistemology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863505612     PISSN: 18794912     EISSN: 18794920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13194-011-0035-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Borgerson, K. (2005). Evidence-based alternative medicine? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48(4), 502-515.
2. Borgerson, K. (2009a). Why reading the title isn't good enough: an evaluation of the 4S approach to evidence-based medicine. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2(2), 152-175.
3. Borgerson, K. (2009b). Valuing evidence: bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2), 218-233.
4. Brown, J. R. (2001). Who rules in science? An opinionated guide to the wars. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Campbell, R. (1998). Illusions of paradox: A feminist epistemology naturalized. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
6. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Goldman, A. I. (2002). Knowledge and social norms. Review of the fate of knowledge, by H. Longino, Science 296:2148-2149.
8. Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.
9. Intemann, K. (2010). Feminist standpoint empiricism: rethinking the terrain in feminist philosophy of science. In P. D. Magnus & J. Busch (Eds.), New waves in philosophy of science (pp. 198-225). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
10. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.
11. Lemmens, T. (2004). Leopards in the temple: restoring integrity to the commercialized research scene. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 32(4), 641-657.
12. Lexchin, J., et al. (2003). Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ, 326, 1167-1170.
13. Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14. Longino, H. (1993). Essential tensions-phase two: feminist, philosophical, and social studies of science. In L. M. Antony & C. Witt (Eds.), A mind of one's own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity (pp. 257-272). Boulder: Westview.
15. Longino, H. (2002a). Reply to Philip Kitcher. Philosophy of Science, 69, 573-577.
16. Longino, H. (2002b). The fate of knowledge. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
17. Michaels, D. (2008). Doubt is their product: How the industry's assault on science threatens your health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Mill, J. S. (1956). On Liberty. New York: The Liberal Arts Press, Inc. [1859].
19. Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20. rd Annual Episteme Conference (University of Toronto)
21. Wylie, A., Dupré, J., & Kincaid, H. (2007). Value-free science? Ideals and illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.