Trajectories of weed communities explained by traits associated with species' response to management practices

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 158, Issue , 2012, Pages 147-155

  Fried, G ^a   Kazakou, E ^b   Gaba, S ^c  

^a CENTRE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE GESTION DES POPULATIONS   (France)

^b CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Arable weeds; Biodiversity; Functional groups; Herbicides; RLQ analysis; Tillage systems

Indexed keywords

CROP ROTATION; DATA SET; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; GERMINATION; HERBICIDE; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; SEED; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SYNCHRONY; TILLAGE; WEED CONTROL; WHEAT;

FRANCE;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84863496363     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baessler C., Klotz S. Effects of changes in agricultural landuse on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 115:43-50.
2. Barralis G. Méthode d'étude des groupements adventices des cultures annuelles. 5ème Colloque International sur l'Ecologie et la Biologie des Mauvaises herbes 1976, INRA, Dijon, pp. 59-68.
3. Barralis G. Répartition et Densité des Principales Mauvaises Herbes en France 1977, INRA - AFPP, Paris.
4. Bohan D.A., Powers S.J., Champion G.T., Haughton A.J., Hawes C., Squire G.R., Cussans J.W., Mertens S.K. Modelling rotation: can crop sequences explain arable weed seed bank abundance?. Weed Res. 2011, 51:422-432.
5. Booth B.D., Swanton C.J. Assembly theory applied to weed communities. Weed Sci. 2002, 50:2-13.
6. Chauvel B., Guillemin J.-P., Colbach N. Evolution of a herbicide-resistant population of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in a long-term cropping system experiment. Crop Prot. 2009, 28:343-349.
7. Chessel D., Dufour A.B., Thioulouse J. The ade4 package. I. One-table method. R News 2004, 4:5-10.
8. Chiarello N.R. Phenology of California grasslands. Grassland Structure and Function: California Annual Grassland 1989, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 47-58. L.F. Huenneke, H.A. Mooney (Eds.).
9. Debaeke P., Orlando D. Simplification du travail du sol et évolution de la flore adventice. Simplification du Travail du Sol. Edition 1994, 35-62. INRA, Paris. G. Monnier, G. Thévenet, B. Lesaffre (Eds.).
10. Díaz S., Acosta A., Cabido M. Morphological analysis of herbaceous communities under different grazing regimens. J. Veg. Sci. 1992, 3:689-696.
11. Dingkuhn M., Johnson D.E., Sow A., Audebert A.Y. Relationships between upland rice canopy characteristics and weed competitiveness. Field Crop Res. 1999, 61:79-95.
12. Doledec S., Chessel D., terBraak C.J.F., Champely S. Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 1996, 3:143-166.
13. Dray S., Legendre P. Testing the species traits-environment relationships: the fourth-corner problem revisited. Ecology 2008, 89:3400-3412.
14. Drobnik J., Römermann C., Bernhardt-Römermann M., Poschlod P. Adaptation of plant functional group composition to management changes in calcareous grassland. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 145:29-37.
15. Fried G., Norton L.R., Reboud X. Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 128:68-76.
16. Fried G., Petit S., Dessaint F., Reboud X. Arable weed decline in Northern France: crop edges as refugia for weed conservation?. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:238-243. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.029.
17. Fried G., Chauvel B., Reboud X. A functional analysis of large-scale temporal shifts from 1970 to 2000 in weed assemblages of sunflower crops in France. J. Veg. Sci. 2009, 20:49-58.
18. Fried G., Petit S., Reboud X. A specialist-generalist classification of the arable flora and its response to changes in agricultural practices. BMC Ecol. 2010, 10:20. 10.1186/1472-6785-10-20.
19. Garnier E., Navas M.L. A trait-based approach to comparative functional plant ecology: concepts, methods and applications for agroecology. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32:365-399.
20. Gordon A. Classification 1999, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL [u.a.].
21. Gulden R.H., Sikkema P.H., Hamill A.S., Tardif F.J., Swanton C.J. Glyphosate-resistant cropping systems in Ontario: multivariate and nominal trait-based weed community structure. Weed Sci. 2010, 58:278-288.
22. Gunton R.M., Petit S., Gaba S. Functional traits relating arable weed communities to crop characteristics. J. Veg. Sci. 2011, 22:541-550.
23. Hanzlik K., Gerowitt B. The importance of climate, site and management on weed vegetation in oilseed rape in Germany. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 141:323-331.
24. Hill M.O., Smith A.J.E. Principal component analysis of taxonomic data with multi-state discrete characters. Taxon 1976, 25:249-255.
25. Kenkel N.C., Derksen D.A., Thomas A.G., Watson P.R. Multivariate analysis in weed science research. Weed Sci. 2002, 50:281-292.
26. Lavorel S., Garnier E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol. 2002, 16:545-556.
27. Lienin P., Kleyer M. Plant leaf economics and reproductive investment are responsive to gradients of land use intensity. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 145:67-76.
28. Lososová Z., Chytry M., Kühn I., Hájek O., Horáková V., Pysěk P., Tichý L. Patterns of plant traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in central Europe. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 2006, 8:69-81.
29. Moles A.T., Westoby M. Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle. Oikos 2006, 113:91-105.
30. Noble I.R., Gitay H. A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes. J. Veg. Sci. 1996, 7:329-336.
31. R Development Core Team A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2004, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
32. Saatkamp A., Römermann C., Dutoit T. Plant functional traits show non-linear response to grazing. Folia Geobot. 2010, 45:239-252.
33. Smith R.G. Timing of tillage is an important filter on the assembly of weed communities. Weed Sci. 2006, 54:705-712.
34. Storkey J. A functional group approach to the management of UK arable weeds to support biological diversity. Weed Res. 2006, 46:513-522.
35. Storkey J., Moss S.R., Cussans J.W. Using assembly theory to explain changes in a weed flora in response to agricultural intensification. Weed Sci. 2010, 58:39-46.
36. Violle C., Garnier E., Lecoeur J., Roumet C., Podeur C., Blanchard A., Navas M.-L. Competition, traits and resource depletion in plant communities. Oecologia 2009, 160:747-755. doi:10.1007/s00442-009-1333-x.
37. Westoby M. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 1998, 199:213-227.
38. Westoby M., Falster D.S., Moles A.T., Vesk P.A., Wright I.J. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002, 33:125-159. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452.
39. Wright I.J., Reich P.B., Westoby M., Ackerly D.D., Baruch Z., Bongers F. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 2004, 428:821-827.
40. Zanin G., Otto S., Riello L., Borin M. Ecological interpretation of weed flora dynamics under different tillage systems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 1997, 66:177-188.