Anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of dairy manure separated by screw pressing and centrifugation in a upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor at 25 °C

Biosystems Engineering

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 344-351

  Rico, Carlos ^a   Rico, José Luis ^a   Lasa, Cristina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADABILITY; CENTRIFUGATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENTS; FERTILIZERS; MANURES; METHANE; PILOT PLANTS; SCREWS; SLUDGE DIGESTION; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

ANAEROBIC BIODEGRADABILITY; COD REMOVAL EFFICIENCY; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; METHANE PRODUCTION; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; SEPARATION PROCESS; UP-FLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BLANKET REACTORS; UPFLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BLANKETS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

EID: 84863484879     PISSN: 15375110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. APHA Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA. 20th ed.
2. Arriaga H., Salcedo G., Casalmiglia S., Merino P. Effect of diet manipulation in dairy cow N balance and nitrogen oxides emissions from grasslands in northern Spain. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 2010, 135:132-139.
3. Boe K., Angelidaki I. Serial CSTR digester configuration for improving biogas production from manure. Water Research 2009, 43:166-172.
4. Castrillón L., Fernández-Nava Y., Marañón E., García L., Berrueta J. Anoxic-aerobic treatment of the liquid fraction of cattle manure. Waste Management 2009, 29:761-766.
5. Clemens J., Trimborn M., Weiland P., Amon B. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 2006, 112:171-177.
6. Derikx P.J.L., Willer H.C., Ten Have P.J.W. Effect of pH on the behaviour of volatile compounds in organic manures during dry matter determination. Bioresource Technology 1994, 49:41-45.
7. Field J., Sierra R., Lettinga G. Ensayos anaerobios. 4° Seminario de Depuración Anaerobia de Aguas Residuales (Anaerobic assays. In: 4th Seminary of anaerobic treatment of wastewaters) 1988, 52-81. University of Valladolid, Spain.
8. Flotats X., Bonmatí A., Fernández B., Magrí A. Manure treatment technologies: on-farm versus centralized strategies. NE Spain as case study. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:5519-5526.
9. Hartmann N., Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K. Increase of anaerobic degradation of particulate organic matter in full-scale biogas plants by mechanical maceration. Water Science and Technology 2000, 41:145-153.
10. Hjorth M., Christensen M.L., Christensen P.V. Flocculation, coagulation, and precipitation of manure affecting three separation techniques. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99:8598-8604.
11. Hjorth M., Christensen K.V., Christensen M.L., Sommer S.G. Solid-liquid separation of animal slurry in theory and practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2010, 30:153-180.
12. Holm-Nielsen J.B., Al Seadi T., Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:5478-5484.
13. Latif M.A., Ghufran R., Wahid Z.A., Ahmad A. Integrated application of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor for the treatment of wastewaters. Water Research 2011, 45:4683-4699.
14. Lee Y.S., Han G.B. Pig slurry treatment by a hybrid multi-stage unit system consisting of an ATAD and an EGSB followed by a SBR reactor. Biosystems Engineering 2012, 111:243-250.
15. Lettinga G., van Velseo A.F.M., Hobma S.W., de Zeeuw W. Use of the upflow sludge blanket (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1980, 22:699-734.
16. Møller H.B., Lund I., Sommer S.G. Solid-liquid separation of livestock slurry: efficiency and cost. Bioresource Technology 2000, 74:223-229.
17. Møller H.B., Sommer S.G., Ahring B.K. Separation efficiency and particle size distribution in relation to manure type and storage conditions. Bioresource Technology 2002, 85:189-196.
18. Raven R.P.J.M., Gregersen K.H. Biogas plants in Denmark: successes and setbacks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2007, 11:116-132.
19. Rico J.L., García H., Rico C., Tejero I. Characterisation of solid and liquid fractions of dairy manure with regard to their component distribution and methane production. Bioresource Technology 2007, 98:971-979.
20. Rico C., Rico J.L., Tejero I., Muñoz N., Gómez B. Anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of dairy manure in pilot plant for biogas production: residual methane yield of digestate. Waste Management 2011, 31:2167-2173.
21. Weiland P. Biomass digestion in agriculture: a successful pathway for the energy production and waste treatment in Germany. Engineering in Life Sciences 2006, 6:302-309.
22. Xie S., Wu G., Lawlor P.G., Frost J.P., Zhan X. Methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of the separated solid fraction of pig manure with dried grass silage. Bioresource Technology 2012, 104:289-297.